republic_roi97
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2016
- Messages
- 1,962
- Likes
- 2,702

That is the hint, that India is serious about its position in the world and can no more, be seen as a soft power.Akbaruddin slams Council
That is the hint, that India is serious about its position in the world and can no more, be seen as a soft power.Akbaruddin slams Council
Yes, that is a hint: India is using mouth to slam the council, this show what kind of power you are.That is the hint, that India is serious about its position in the world and can no more, be seen as a soft power.
We ignore council resolution which china as a permanent member is bound to enforce. Now what kind of pussy power you areYes, that is a hint: India is using mouth to slam the council, this show what kind of power you are.
We are kind of power with most strategic assets which council members have.Yes, that is a hint: India is using mouth to slam the council, this show what kind of power you are.
So said the clowns who got bitch slapped by Mongolia.Yes, that is a hint: India is using mouth to slam the council, this show what kind of power you are.
Remember gow the hell u got the seat at the top table kidYes, that is a hint: India is using mouth to slam the council, this show what kind of power you are.
Amid the Sino-Soviet split and Vietnam War, American President Nixon entered into negotiations with CommunistChairman Mao, initially through a secret 1971 trip undertaken by Henry Kissinger to visit Zhou Enlai. On October 25, 1971, Albania's motion to recognize the People's Republic of China as the sole legal China was passed as General Assembly Resolution 2758. It was supported by most of the communist states (including the Soviet Union) and non-aligned countries(such as India), but also by some American allies such as the UK and France. Nixon thenpersonally visited China the next year, beginning the normalization of Sino-American relations.
We are the kind of pussy power that India is desperately begging to be.We ignore council resolution which china as a permanent member is bound to enforce. Now what kind of pussy power you are![]()
So far, no one but India believes that you have that strategic assets.We are kind of power with most strategic assets which council members have.
What can you do in International Politics except mouth slamming? Do you want us to militarily challenge P5?
Just because UNSC doesn't recognize India as a nuclear power, that doesn't mean India won't be.So far, no one but India believes that you have that strategic assets.
We have done already.Well, how about re-starting nuclear test to prove that everyone is wrong?
Why we would tell? Enough,Exploring every type of warhead you claiming that you have,
Will destroy ozone layer.one by one until the whole world coming to beg you to stop.
That is where you need to convince everyone.Just because UNSC doesn't recognize India as a nuclear power, that doesn't mean India won't be.
Everyone else thinks you failed. So, what you do? Screaming louder? or just blowing a full scale h-bomb to prove they are all wrong?We have done already.
That means you are not ready for the seat yet! So, come back when you are not afraid of the sanctions.Not want sanctions again.
We will do it later, when sanctioned India could really push global economy down.
Firstly, different thing;Why we would tell? Enough,
Among all non NPT nuclear powers India, Pakistan, NoKo etc.,
only India is validated advanced reactors, FBRs or propulsion systems.
Only means you have some good R&D base or you are willing to contribute funds. Has nothing to do with UNSC seat.You know, India is a part of project ITER for fusion reactors while other non NPTs aren't.
There must be some very good reason.
Underground test won't.Will destroy ozone layer.
No body wants to be like China. Not even Mongolia.We are the kind of pussy power that India is desperately begging to be.
Well, if a country like China can, won't be a difficult job for us.That is where you need to convince everyone.
Just because you think so, it won't represent everyone.:biggrin2: Cuz, I'm able to find out opinion of everyone else but you. Or you want a technical explanation.Everyone else thinks you failed. So, what you do? Screaming louder?
We will fulfill your this wish too but later. GlobalTimes will again spew theur bull$hit and you'll be seen defending em.or just blowing a full scale h-bomb to prove they are all wrong?
LOL, seat members don't get sanctions.That means you are not ready for the seat yet! So, come back when you are not afraid of the sanctions.
Still able to point out what's akin.Firstly, different thing;
How do you define "too much" and small assistance? I don't guess China started from scratch but got assistance from Soviets. India stole from Canada.Secondly, too much foreign assistance in all of these tec.
Wrong, funds become insignificant when you have US R&D budget.Only means you have some good R&D base or you are willing to contribute funds. Has nothing to do with UNSC seat.
You'll again be able to detect its correct yield and call it failed. Wastage of time.Underground test won't.
Chinese are funny people. On one hand they claim that Indian nukes are inferior , unreliable etc on the other hand when India tests A4 A5 they shit their pants and bring out a 1998 UNSC resolution claiming that India has crossed minimum deterrence thresholdYou'll again be able to detect its correct yield and call it failed. Wastage of time.![]()
not that great of an offer. just by sitting there permanently would be not all that great if veto power is not there.India made a good offer.. UNSC should take a good look at this.. otherwise the relevance of UN in world order will go down in future..
The condition is temporary.. once there is a full fledged discussion on how to move forward in a certain time period then all the members should have the veto power.. so this is feasible.. There is no separate category here, just same as old permanent member with veto power but not able to use until the discussion about any matter is not achieved..not that great of an offer. just by sitting there permanently would be not all that great if veto power is not there.
that would mean a separate category of permanent member who can sit there all the time but never use its veto ?
india is just trying to open the gate first..when its opened then ander ghus kr jo krna h woh krengenot that great of an offer. just by sitting there permanently would be not all that great if veto power is not there.
that would mean a separate category of permanent member who can sit there all the time but never use its veto ?