If India has to go for a two fronts war against China and Pakistan...

arya

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
3,006
Likes
1,531
Country flag
u and many Inidans, IMO, over-estimate China's might and ambitions. just review what USSR was like. It had military bases and allies all over the world, from Viet Nam to Cuba, to Africa, at its heyday. What does China have, except that so-called string of pearls (non-existent or deliberately overhyped by Indian media) in IOR?? So China is simply bound to be a regional power.

u say "China knows India can't attack India". But why don't u put it the other way - "China can't attack India"?? Multi- front fights mean China has to stand confrontations with the US, and Japan, SKorea... and cut-off of China's sea routes for oil/gas through Malacca and then Indian Ocean then to Persian Gulf. Don't imagine China is ready or capable of handling all this.

Besides u don't understand Chinese mindset. We're mostly the single son of our families. We cherish our lives (if not more than u do). We indulge in material desires (more than Indians do).

u Indians tend to magnify the 'threat'. probably it's good to put your compatriots on the alert all the time, or make your servicemen ready for defending Vaterland at any moment, or grow your economy and defence industry to weather any eventualities, or divert your people's attention from domestic itches toward foreign 'menace'. but sometimes it's being overdone.

Are the border disputes so bothering both peoples? If they can be resolved in our generation, great. That means we can move ahead without all those 'burdens'. If not, we certainly can still address other prioirties on agenda for mutual good (in other words shelf the 'dfferences'). In Asia Russia holds S. Suril Islands of Japan. Korea quarrels with Japan over Take Island. China and Japan are bitter over Diaoyu Island. So do these get deteriorated to the extent of xx-front wars?
well don't you think we guys look easy excuse if that will happen then ......................

simple thing is that India should be ready for anything and fact is we are not our force is just nothing in compare to them we are lacking they are making large numbers of weapons good infrastructure and we are making good excuse
 

arya

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
3,006
Likes
1,531
Country flag
yes my friend it is TRUE...indian posts along LAC are minimum 50 kms inside LAC where as Chinese posts are on LAC...
There are very stupid reasons for it...I am telling you all because I Belong to family of BSF personals and I have seen these facts with my own eyes...
1. There is no road or even a path to reach LAC on foot....OUR GOVT IS NOT SERIOUS OF MAKING A SINGLE ROAD and then is complaining that Chinese are making roads and getting close to us... The fact is that they are actually sitting inside our LAC and even our Army knows this...
2. The infrastructure to defend LAC with China is not developed..If our soldiers go on a patrol and are stuck close to LAC due to bad whether or other natural calamities then ....the army bases dont have night flying Helicoptors to get them back and the soldiers therefore are not allowed to patrol as there is no backup for them...
3. The arms and Night vision facilities are insufficient......or not in working condition....
4. Chinese on the other hand uses state of the art guarding equipments that are stealthy and very advance...
5. We say that our Su30Mki's can strike deep in China...but the fact is that If INDIA even think about this..THE CHINESE Will Blow OUR MKI's standing on the bases itself...ie before even flying.....So u can imagine What we are up againt...and how strong is our enemy...
6. india maintains the second strike capability...but whereas China maintains the aggressor cabability of Strike and complete anhiliation on enemy at first place....My question is WHAT IS THE USE OF SECOND STRIKE CAPABILITY IF YOU GET OWNED/DESTROYED AT THE FIRST PLACE?
7. To counter Pakistan we need MKI's, Mig 29's...but to counter CHINA we dont need these...what we need is the BEST DEFENCE SHIELD THAT WE CAN GET QUICKLY, we need thousands of MISSILES to strike deep in CHINA (No Mki will do this)....We need Missile bases (like china) on the borders (BUT THIS IS A DREAM BECAUSE AT THIS MOMENT EVEN OUR SOLDIERS ARE NOT CLOSE TO LAC SO MAY BE I AM DAY DREAMING >>>SORRY FOR THE FALSE DREAM GUYS)
8. To contain China we need the same strategy what CHINA uses againt USA..and THAT IS EYE FOR AN EYE, HEAD FOR A HEAD....I mean ....to fight a DRAGON we need to behave like a TIGER.

your 7 and 8 point is very important

7To counter Pakistan we need MKI's, Mig 29's...but to counter CHINA we dont need these...what we need is the BEST DEFENCE SHIELD THAT WE CAN GET QUICKLY, we need thousands of MISSILES to strike deep in CHINA (No Mki will do this)....We need Missile bases (like china) on the borders (BUT THIS IS A DREAM BECAUSE AT THIS MOMENT EVEN OUR SOLDIERS ARE NOT CLOSE TO LAC SO MAY BE I AM DAY DREAMING >>>SORRY FOR THE FALSE DREAM GUYS)
8. To contain China we need the same strategy what CHINA uses againt USA..and THAT IS EYE FOR AN EYE, HEAD FOR A HEAD....I mean ....to fight a DRAGON we need to behave like a TIGER
 

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
what will you do if the next war will be more level then kargil now we are talking about two fron and i hope you saw how was our preparation in time of kargil

how can we fight two front while we are lacking in every field

1 ) we have less numbers of fighter planes as compare to china and even pakistan has f16

2) we have shortage of artillary for our army if i m not wrong we took bofors gun as last one how will our army fight while pakistan is inducting new one

3) our navy is still lacking and see our AC from Russia is delaying and less number of destroyer as compare to china

4) now china has base in shiri lanka , Pakistan but we dont have any outside base from where we can make some counter attack on pakistan

5) MMRCA delay we took 6 year to select a plane

6 ) govt policy is not good for nation security


how can we fight two front while we are lacking in every where
Again I must tell you that it does not matter that what and how much you have, but the thing that matters is that how you use that what you have.
1. About the fighters, it is not so that China has a 1 on 10 benefit on India. About the F-16`s you must remember that they cant be good(as compared to modern technologies) as they wee rejected from MMRCA. They are inferior to even our Su-30 MKI`s.

2. What does that means "how will our army fight while pakistan is inducting new one "? Our men will fight no matter what the situation is. If a war is declared against us then our soldiers will not say that " we will not fight until we have proper number of artillery and howitzers".

3.China also dont operates any AC currently, though it has its future induction plans. Experience also matters. India has far more experience on an AC than China. Again Indian Navy rules the Indian Ocean and is expert in naval warfares whereas China here also lacks in experience. Blocking the entrance of Chinese navy into Indian Ocean is not very tough then how will their bases survive without reinforcements.

4.To make a counter attack on Pakistan, we do not require any base on any nation. By the way have very good relations with gulf nations so we may get some benefit there.
Dear try to understand. China is constructing naval base on Sri Lanka and Pakistan to make its hold stronger in the Indian ocean as its most of the oil passes through these regions bordering India but India has a direct contact with Pakistan on all sea,air and land so what`s the need for any base on foreign land for Pakistan.

5. MMRCA is just at the edge of completion and induction of jets is very likely to begin this year.

6. Till now Government policy had provided proper security and safety to our nation from any foreign invasion except 1962.(that too at that time situations were different).

We are lacking in some fields that doesnt mean that we cannot fight and win a war. Our Armed forces are not made of cowards. We havent learnt to retreat. If any bastard tried to touch our motherland then we will break those dirty hands. We will fight and fight till the last drop of our blood.
"Apni azaadi ko hum hargiz mita sakte nahi, sar kata sakte hain lekin sar jhuka sakte nahi".
Jai Hind.
 
Last edited:

arya

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
3,006
Likes
1,531
Country flag
Again I must tell you that it does not matter that what and how much you have, but the thing that matters is that how you use that what you have.
1. About the fighters, it is not so that China has a 1 on 10 benefit on India. About the F-16`s you must remember that they cant be good(as compared to modern technologies) as they wee rejected from MMRCA. They are inferior to even our Su-30 MKI`s.
don't you know china also has su30mkk2 so just don't think about china just think about them also
2. What does that means "how will our army fight while pakistan is inducting new one "? Our men will fight no matter what the situation is. If a war is declared against us then our soldiers will not say that " we will not fight until we have proper number of artillery and howitzers".
do they have any option?? they are solider they will fight but what is our duty
what govt is doing cant we provide them weapons well you think human life in india is cheap as compare to weapon

3.China also dont operates any AC currently, though it has its future induction plans. Experience also matters. India has far more experience on an AC than China. Again Indian Navy rules the Indian Ocean and is expert in naval warfares whereas China here also lacks in experience. Blocking the entrance of Chinese navy into Indian Ocean is not very tough then how will their bases survive without reinforcements.
i hope you heard they made AC killer so don't live in dream now even USA is worrying

4.To make a counter attack on Pakistan, we do not require any base on any nation. By the way have very good relations with gulf nations so we may get some benefit there.
Dear try to understand. China is constructing naval base on Sri Lanka and Pakistan to make its hold stronger in the Indian ocean as its most of the oil passes through these regions bordering India but India has a direct contact with Pakistan on all sea,air and land so what`s the need for any base on foreign land for Pakistan.
well these base are not just for attack that's main for strategic gains china is trying to bound us with our neighbor

5. MMRCA is just at the edge of completion and induction of jets is very likely to begin this year.
i wish it will be before 2015 or 2020 cant say anything

6. Till now Government policy had provided proper security and safety to our nation from any foreign invasion except 1962.(that too at that time situations were different).
my friend due to our policy and overconfidence we lost so many life

do you know how many life we lost in kargil have any idea ?


We are lacking in some fields that doesnt mean that we cannot fight and win a war. Our Armed forces are not made of cowards. We havent learnt to retreat. If any bastard tried to touch our motherland then we will break those dirty hands. We will fight and fight till the last drop of our blood.
"Apni azaadi ko hum hargiz mita sakte nahi, sar kata sakte hain lekin sar jhuka sakte nahi".
Jai Hind.
jai hind
 

vikramrana_1812

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
445
Likes
24
Country flag
Again I must tell you that it does not matter that what and how much you have, but the thing that matters is that how you use that what you have.
1. About the fighters, it is not so that China has a 1 on 10 benefit on India. About the F-16`s you must remember that they cant be good(as compared to modern technologies) as they wee rejected from MMRCA. They are inferior to even our Su-30 MKI`s. .
They have Su30Mk's and J10's/B's and also is in large number...dont underestimate these planes....its is not like F-22 vs F-15...it is almost same like Su30Mki(slightly better) vs Su30 Mkk....and they have more planes to takle all our planes...so no question of defeat....

2. What does that means "how will our army fight while pakistan is inducting new one "? Our men will fight no matter what the situation is. If a war is declared against us then our soldiers will not say that " we will not fight until we have proper number of artillery and howitzers"..
What a choice for Army....IT IS NOT A RAJNEEKANT MOVIE....

3.China also dont operates any AC currently, though it has its future induction plans. Experience also matters. India has far more experience on an AC than China. Again Indian Navy rules the Indian Ocean and is expert in naval warfares whereas China here also lacks in experience. Blocking the entrance of Chinese navy into Indian Ocean is not very tough then how will their bases survive without reinforcements."..
Even USA fear of howering around their South China Sea port due to their long range Missiles and AC destroying capabilities....U WANT INDIA TO WIN THAT FRONT......Wow.......its like a hindi movie where a HERO kills an army of 100 villians with just 6 bullets (1 Pistol).......

4.To make a counter attack on Pakistan, we do not require any base on any nation. By the way have very good relations with gulf nations so we may get some benefit there.
Are u so dam sure that any other country will allow India to wage a war on Pakistan from their land....I DONT THINK SO...

Dear try to understand. China is constructing naval base on Sri Lanka and Pakistan to make its hold stronger in the Indian ocean as its most of the oil passes through these regions bordering India but India has a direct contact with Pakistan on all sea,air and land so what`s the need for any base on foreign land for Pakistan.

5. MMRCA is just at the edge of completion and induction of jets is very likely to begin this year..
till the time we get our full strenght of MMRCA planes...China will get their 5th gen planes...-----Wow great news for us...

6. Till now Government policy had provided proper security and safety to our nation from any foreign invasion except 1962.(that too at that time situations were different)...
how the situation is different now.......1962 China attacked...1999 pakistan....we are still the same....because currently we now that chinese are moving closer to us day by day by making roads/railway systems across their side and we are jus COMPLAINING....what a strategy...

We are lacking in some fields that doesnt mean that we cannot fight and win a war. Our Armed forces are not made of cowards. We havent learnt to retreat. If any bastard tried to touch our motherland then we will break those dirty hands. We will fight and fight till the last drop of our blood.
"Apni azaadi ko hum hargiz mita sakte nahi, sar kata sakte hain lekin sar jhuka sakte nahi".
Jai Hind.
Yes we will fight till the last drop of our blood......Its of no use if we still loose the fight......


JAI HIND
 
Last edited:

171K

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
111
Likes
18

If this is the attitude of India, it only encourages China & others! What can India do in these circumstances?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

vikramrana_1812

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
445
Likes
24
Country flag

If this is the attitude of India, it only encourages China & others! What can India do in these circumstances?
having attitude is good ....but neglecting the reality is foolishness.........Be real and show attitude is what we should do....but for that too.....the first step is ..Be brave in facing the realities and then face your enemy.....The Enemy here is stronger, has won a war already with you, is more capable, have bigger army, have more fighter jets, have more missiles (long range)....how on earth can we think that we are going to stop them in a war ........Lets be real...First we need to be at par...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,868
Likes
23,312
Country flag

If this is the attitude of India, it only encourages China & others! What can India do in these circumstances?
What can we expect from the scam-full, inept and soft-on-terror government? Chinese inspire their citizens through their military's patriotism while our sarkar is asking an already burdened army to "let go". Such short-sighted fools in Indian government are the reason why we lost 500 precious soldiers in Kargil War against a smaller, lesser-equipped adversary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

smartindian

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
614
Likes
59
Country flag
guys we dont need to attack china we need to defend against china ,where as against paki's we need to attack them. we have remember that china has more number of enemy that we have (Taiwan, Vietnam,south Korea,japan , aus,US, even with asean they so many disputes . we need to have strategical relation with all this country's. two front war is a worst case scenario for us, it is hypothetically not possible.
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,868
Likes
23,312
Country flag

If this is the attitude of India, it only encourages China & others! What can India do in these circumstances?
Obviously this shows the treachery of Congress government in their commitment to Buddhist people. We are also described as minorities under their list (Even though we don't acknowledge this classification). Then why ignoring us? I hope this is proof enough to show all fellow Indians what these people are when it comes to religious favours and votebank policies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yatharth Singh

Knowledge is power.
Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
744
Likes
176
Country flag
Centre steps up Army deployment along China border

R Dutta Choudhury
GUWAHATI, Aug 22 – Following persistent demands from the Government of Arunachal Pradesh, the Centre has finally initiated steps for augmenting security measures along the international border with China and additional troops are being moved into the bordering areas, while, a battalion of the Arunachal Scouts has also been sanctioned.
Talking to The Assam Tribune, Member of Parliament from Arunachal Pradesh, Sanjoy Takam said that he, along with Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Dorjee Khandu met Prime Minister and the Defence Minister recently and discussed the situation on the ground. He said that the Government of India has sanctioned two additional divisions of the Army to be deployed in Arunachal Pradesh for improving vigil along the international border with China. One division of the Army consists of around 10,000 to 12,000 personnel.

The Government of Arunachal Pradesh has already finalized the plot of land for the Army to set up the new divisional bases and the land would be handed over soon. At present, one division of the Army with its headquarter in Tenga valley is looking after the international border, while, parts of the division based in Dinjan are also deployed in Arunachal Pradesh. The creation of the new divisions will more than double the strength of the Army along the Arunachal Pradesh-China border.

Sanjoy said that for years, the Government of Arunachal Pradesh has been demanding creation of Arunachal Scouts in lines of the Ladakh Scouts to improve vigil along the international border and the Government of India has sanctioned one battalion recently. He said that the recruitment rallies of the battalion of the Arunachal Scouts have started and 50 per cent of the posts of the battalion would be filled up with local youths and the remaining youths would be recruited from the rest of the country. The Government of Arunachal Pradesh has demanded that the youths of the North East should get preference in recruitments to be made from the rest of the country.

The personnel of the Arunachal Scouts would work along with the Army under the Ministry of Defence. The local youths are well aware of the ground situation and they are also well acclimatized with the adverse terrain to play their part in assisting the Army in manning the international border, Sanjoy pointed out and said that over the years, the personnel of the Ladakh Scouts did a commendable job in guarding the international border. He said that the Government of India also agreed to sanction a second battalion of the Arunachal Scouts comprising 70 per cent of locals immediately after the recruitment and training of the first battalion is completed.

In addition to that, the Centre has also accepted the demand for building of airstrips in forward positions and seven such airstrips are being constructed in strategic locations.

The Government of Arunachal Pradesh has also demanded that the Government should construct a road all along the McMahon Line to improve vigil and to facilitate movement of troops all along the international border, but the Government of India is yet to act on that.

The Government of India has sanctioned a Rs 24,000 crore trans Arunachal highway but the construction of the same is yet to start, said Sanjoy.

Hydropower projects: Commenting on the recent controversy over the decision of the Government of Arunachal Pradesh for construction of a number of hydropower projects, Sanjoy said that the issues like seismic vulnerability, environmental issues etc would be taken care of while constructing the hydro power projects. He claimed that majority of the projects would be run of the river ones and mega dams would not be constructed. The people of Assam should not be apprehensive of the projects and in fact the projects would benefit Assam, he claimed.

The Member of Parliament said that parts of Arunachal Pradesh were facing food scarcity because of the failure of the Food Corporation of India to clear the dues of the contractors and there have been instances when the State Government was forced to airlift essential items. He said that the matter has already been taken up with the Prime Minister and following his directive, the Centre has convened a high level meeting on August 26 to resolve the issue.

The Assam Tribune Online
 

civfanatic

Retired
Ambassador
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,562
Likes
2,572
It seems the GoI is finally taking major steps to increase the military strength along the Sino-Indian border, as well as improving infrastructure in the region. Good to hear that.

Also, it should be noted that in terms of an aerial engagement over Arunachal Pradesh, India has a clear advantage. Chinese aircraft will have to take off at higher altitudes from airbases in Tibet, which means they will have to carry lighter payloads, and it is unknown how Chinese aircraft perform at such high altitudes, which can severely degrade an aircraft's performace. IAF has already shown that it is very proficient at high-altitude CAS and CAP missions during the Kargil War, but the PLAAF, which so far has not played a major role in ANY conflict, has yet to do so. If anything else IAF will have a decisive edge when it comes to real-time combat experience.

Also, the limited battlespace over Arunachal Pradesh means that neither India nor China can use their full inventory of combat aircraft, or even a large portion of them. Quality will matter a lot more quanitity, and IAF has the qualitative edge over PLAAF. Sukhoi Corporation itself has stated that the Su-30MKI is on par with the Su-35 and is currently the most advanced in the Flanker family. China may have a large quantity of jets overall but very few modern 4th+ generation jets (less than 300 total of Su-30MKK, Su-27s and copies, and J-10s). And most of these jets are based near Taiwan, Japan, and Russia, not India. In comparison we have two squadrons of Su-30MKI ready at TEZPUR in Assam.

Let's be realistic here guys.
 

Agantrope

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
1,247
Likes
77
It seems the GoI is finally taking major steps to increase the military strength along the Sino-Indian border, as well as improving infrastructure in the region. Good to hear that.

Also, it should be noted that in terms of an aerial engagement over Arunachal Pradesh, India has a clear advantage. Chinese aircraft will have to take off at higher altitudes from airbases in Tibet, which means they will have to carry lighter payloads, and it is unknown how Chinese aircraft perform at such high altitudes, which can severely degrade an aircraft's performace. IAF has already shown that it is very proficient at high-altitude CAS and CAP missions during the Kargil War, but the PLAAF, which so far has not played a major role in ANY conflict, has yet to do so. If anything else IAF will have a decisive edge when it comes to real-time combat experience.

Also, the limited battlespace over Arunachal Pradesh means that neither India nor China can use their full inventory of combat aircraft, or even a large portion of them. Quality will matter a lot more quanitity, and IAF has the qualitative edge over PLAAF. Sukhoi Corporation itself has stated that the Su-30MKI is on par with the Su-35 and is currently the most advanced in the Flanker family. China may have a large quantity of jets overall but very few modern 4th+ generation jets (less than 300 total of Su-30MKK, Su-27s and copies, and J-10s). And most of these jets are based near Taiwan, Japan, and Russia, not India. In comparison we have two squadrons of Su-30MKI ready at TEZPUR in Assam.

Let's be realistic here guys.
PLAAF have lot a bigger more ambition than us, Taiwan in th east and some china sea area conflict with the vietnam. They cant invest all for a single rivalry
 

shuvo@y2k10

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
2,653
Likes
6,710
Country flag
mr arya if china has potential carrier killer then we also have the same including brahmos,club missiles(which even the us has no answer to.) . india is not a carrier based navy and it has only one carrier at the present that too having obsolete aircrafts like sea carriers.i don't think the ring of pearls strategy of china to encircle us is going to work as expected by china mainly because near all these bases we have our own air force bases and missile bases. at present the indian navy rules the india ocean.to do a similar role in the indian oean china need to commit at least 60-70% of its naval assets thereby leaving the defence of south china sea vulnurable.but i think india should increase the missile bases in the china border housing at least thousand cruise missile(like brahmos, nirbhoy,shourya) to target chinese military installations in tibet and at least hundred agni 2, agni 3 to bring the main chinese cities including beijing within striking distance. india must also ramp up its bmd defences along china border and coastline and have a agni 5 base in andaman after it is inducted.as the chinese econo,y grows further i don't think we can compete in numbers rather we must develop asymetric warfare capabilities like bmd, asat and directed energy weapons based on ship borne,airborne platforms,hypersonic vehicles,icbm's,cyber warfare etc.
 

civfanatic

Retired
Ambassador
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
4,562
Likes
2,572
The PLAN does not currently have the capabilty to effectively project power in our backyard (Indian Ocean). China's "ring of pearls" has little military significance.
 

vikramrana_1812

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
445
Likes
24
Country flag
India keen on buying britains futuristic aircraft carrier


ShareA futuristic aircraft carrier that India is reported to be keen on buying from Britain is envisaged as a giant guardian of the high seas, capable of travelling thousands of kilometres from home and wreaking massive destruction on enemy targets, experts said Monday.

India has reportedly "lodged a firm expression of interest" in buying one of two huge aircraft carriers that are currently under construction - the largest warships ever built by Britain, and designed to be the most capable aircraft carriers outside the US Navy.
Britain is considering selling the warship to India for two billion pounds under a cost-cutting plan chalked out by its ministry of defence, the Observer reported Sunday quoting senior defence sources.

The two 65,000-tonne ships are being built for the Royal Navy by British Aerospace (BAE) - HMS Queen Elizabeth, on which work began this July will be the first to be rolled out in 2016. And preparatory work has started for the second, the Prince of Wales, due for launch in 2018.

A leading British naval expert told IANS the two warships embody a "huge quantum leap" in terms of technology, reach and power.

"It's all about power projection. The Indian Navy is in the process of expanding its reach as a naval force capable of operating far from its own shores," said Jon Rosamond, editor of the authoritative Jane's Navy International.

"The Indian Navy has been patrolling the Gulf of Aden on an anti-piracy mission, but this ship will increase its reach even further afield," he added.

"It would give India access to the Far East and even the Western Pacific. The aircraft carrier has a life span of 40-50 years, so there has been a lot of speculation. People are talking about the rivalry with China in particular," Rosamond told IANS.

The ships under construction are the result of recommendations that came out of a wide-ranging Strategic Defence Review (SDR) undertaken by the Labour government in 1997 of nearly every weapon system in Britain.

The SDR concluded: "The emphasis is now on increased offensive air power, and an ability to operate the largest possible range of aircraft in the widest possible range of roles."

The warships will be equipped with ski ramp-assisted takeoff at the front, which will suit the Sukhoi strike aircraft that India is buying from Russia, Rosamond said.

"It will be able to carry not only enhanced aircraft, but also more of them," Rosamond said.

Strategic experts said that the anticipated "quantum jump" in Indian naval power would have the backing of the world's major navies.
 

vikramrana_1812

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
445
Likes
24
Country flag
China worried about India's growing military power

The fleet-footed Dragon may be rapidly spreading its wings across the globe but remains a wee bit wary of the flat-footed Elephant next door.

The US Pentagon's latest assessment of the expanding military might of China, which has now overtaken Japan to become the world's second-largest economy, holds that Beijing is "concerned" with the "strategic ramifications of India's rising economic, political and military power". Consequently, "to improve regional deterrence", the 2.25-million strong People's Liberation Army has moved "more advanced and survivable" solid-fuelled CCS-5 nuclear-capable ballistic missiles closer to the borders with India.

" China may also be developing contingency plans to move airborne troops into the region," says the Pentagon report on 'military and security developments involving the People's Republic of China'.

Though there is nothing new in all this to startle the Indian defence establishment, it does reinforce the point that China continues to upgrade its already massive build-up of military infrastructure all along the unresolved 4,057-km Line of Actual Control.


Satellite pictures, for instance, have long disclosed that a large area in central China, near Delingha and Da Qaidam in Qinghai province, has close to 60 launch pads for nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, which can easily target north India.
Moreover, the new Chinese road-mobile DF-31A missiles, which can hit targets 11,200 km away, and the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles, which have a reach beyond 7,200 km, are weapons which even has the US worried.

China, of course, continues to needle India with frequent troop incursions across the LAC, from Trig Heights and Pangong Tso lake in Eastern Ladakh to the "finger area" in Sikkim and Asaphila sector in Arunachal Pradesh.

The Pentagon report, in fact, says, "Despite increased political and economic relations over the years between China and India, tensions remain along their shared 4,057-km border, most notably over Arunachal Pradesh, which China asserts is part of Tibet and therefore of China, and over the Askai Chin region."

Holding that both sides "stepped up efforts to assert their claims" in 2009, the report refers to China's bid to block the ADB's $2.90 billion loan to India, claiming part of the loan was to be used for water projects in Arunachal. "This represented the first time China sought to influence this dispute through a multilateral institution," it says.

There is no getting away from the stark asymmetry between India and China in terms of strategic and military capabilities. But the 1.3-million strong Indian armed forces are no longer the ill-equipped forces they were during the virtual walkover in 1962.

India plans to test its most ambitious ballistic missile, the 5,000-km Agni-V, by early 2011 to add to its military deterrence posture. Moreover, apart from the almost ready-to-be-inducted 3,500-km Agni-III, IAF has already begun to base Sukhoi-30MKI fighters in north-east as well as upgrade several airstrips and helipads in the region.

Latest Defence news: China worried about India's growing military power
 

Anshu Attri

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
1,218
Likes
679
Country flag
Tough challenges in neighbourhood; update war doctrines: PM


Update war doctrines for new threats: PM


New Delhi: Backing the modernisation of defence forces, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Monday underlined his commitment to preserving India's strategic autonomy and stressed that it is too large a country to be boxed into any alliance or regional arrangement.

Commending the armed forces for their contribution to the country's security, the prime minister said: "Our Armed Forces deserve the best and I wish to assure you that the government will make every effort to ensure this. No country can make progress without ensuring its security and territorial integrity."

Manmohan Singh also strongly endorsed the growing demand for the much-needed modernisation of the defence forces. "As our economy grows and our technological capabilities expand, we must set higher standards for the modernisation of our defence forces," he said.



"It is not enough for us to keep pace with change. When it comes to defence capability, we must be ahead of the technology curve," he stressed.

Defence modernisation, the Prime Minister said, must involve the full chain starting with updating war fighting doctrines to meet new threats to our security, preparation of appropriate staff quality requirements and creating a broad-based production and delivery infrastructure on the ground.

Alluding to a shift of economic and political power to Asia, he also said that "some of our toughest challenges lie in the immediate neighbourhood", and underlined that the country cannot "realise growth ambitions unless we ensure peace and stability in South Asia".

"We have always prided ourselves on preserving our strategic autonomy, and this is an article of faith for us," Singh told the Combined Commanders' Conference in the capital.

"India is too large a country to be boxed into any alliance or regional or sub-regional arrangements, whether trade, economic or political," he said.

Putting India's economic transformation at the heart of the country's foreign policy and strategic orientation, Singh said in order to sustain 9 to 10 percent growth rate and to modernize its infrastructure, India needs to "maintain healthy relations with all major powers".

Describing "Naxalism (Maoism)" as "a serious challenge to India's internal security", he said combating it was a "collective task involving the centre and the states". "At the same time, we have to accelerate our development efforts in the Naxal-affected areas and make our administrative machinery more sensitive and responsive to local concerns," he said.

Placing India's growth story in the larger global context, the Prime Minister said although the Indian economy has weathered the global economic crisis of 2008 better than most of the large economies of the world, there is little room for complacency.

"We have the advantage of a continental-sized economy and a large internal market, but our challenge will be to ensure that our growth is balanced across all regions and reaches all sections of our society," he said.

"In global terms, we are witnessing a shift of economic and political power to Asia," he said, while calling for greater attention to the Asia-Pacific region, including South East Asia. "There is a palpable desire on the part of the countries of this region to enhance cooperation with us which we must reciprocate," he said ahead of the India-ASEAN summit next month.

To realise India's growth targets, the country must diversify its energy options. "It is in this context that we need to operationalise our nuclear energy option, which holds great promise and is a necessity," he said.

-IANS
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top