All my readings indicate that they are to die before they can re-enforce anyone. This is on par with para/air assualt doctrines of the East Bloc.
And the east bloc soldiers live with that reality. Unreal.
In the context of the 1980s, they were the only formation capable of striking through Pakistan.
In context, 3 PLA regiments and 6 InA brigades already moved. From what I can gather, warning orders were issued to two Military Regions (none of them activated) but the whole thing died down before anymore signifcant military movements got underway. No shooting was involved.
If my understanding was right, the Indians want to take all of Askin Chin while the PLA was preparing a two front all out war. Both armies were thankful that cooler heads prevailed.
Did this happen in the early 80s or late 80s sir? If it was the late 80s then Siachen may have been a deterring factor for any action from both sides.
It is strange that I found a Chinese article listing all the Chinese regiments and their COs involved in that war with also all the Indian brigades and their CO. Have any Indian historian or journalist ever found the name of a single Chinese regiment in that war?
I don't understand. Do you imply our media was playing it down or were incompetent?
My point here is that the Indian side still got a lot to learn from that war, least of all the Chinese commanders involved.
Will not deny that sir.
They fought each other. The Black Hats against the Yellow Hats is a well know Tibettan fued.
True they fought each other. In the 70s India led subversive activities against the all powerful Pakistani Army in East Pakistan with fewer members of the Mukti Bahini. That's one reason why Pakistani doctrine specifically states the use of Nuclear Weapons against India if large scale subversive activities are reported. Never underestimate the determination of a few people untied in one goal. It always bites back when it's least expected.
Check out the CAPF border guards. They ain't Han-Chinese.
You mean People's Armed Police force. Are they Tibetans or some other minority? I don't know.
They number more than a million. I am sure majority of them will be Han Chinese.
And yet, they've done far more work in modernization than the Indian Army and I mean doctrine and technique wise. In the past 30 years, I've seen first units (company level modernization), brigadization (reduced divisions), battalion size battle groups. In essence, they have moved from a traditional east bloc regiment-division-army to a very unique Chinese battalion-brigade-group army model and one I don't know if it would work or not (I'm seeing a lot of mistakes). At the same time, we've only seen the Indian Cold Start Integrated Battle Group announced and still, I have yet to see the TOE of that echelon.
One thing I have learned in my military career. Expect the other guy to be smarter than you are but learn his limitations. The one thing the Chinese are doing more than the Indians is that they are learning more about their own limitations than the Indians are learning about their own.
I will not deny anything. All of this is true. We even had serving officers coming out with criticism some years ago. Something about using WW2 strategies and tactics even today.
We have been working on some levels of networking in the last decade. This is an article on Mercury Thunder,
?Mercury Thunder? To Enable Real Time Battlefield Data Transfer
We are also working on new modular assault rifles, better winter clothing and food. The new rifles will have the basic single shot, burst and automatic firing capability and capable of firing 3 different calibers.
For some info on the gun(multi-Caliber Individual Weapon System).
YouTube - DDRO develops Human Soldier Weapon System.
So, in technology we are doing something when it comes to modernization. In tactics and strategy, I am not able to comment on it. But, we have conducted quite a few exercises that involved NBC and net centric warfare(Though it's not yet reached Corps level).