Bharatiya
Regular Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2022
- Messages
- 501
- Likes
- 3,678
There was a short debate on Churchill here. Don't focus on whether he intended a famine or not. We are not trying to be journalists digging the truth, we should look to set narratives. Or what? People want simple, easy to understand statements. That applies for Indians as well as the Brits.
Even if he intended good for India, Churchill is ultimately an agent of the British Empire and worse, the hero of Brits. That alone is reason enough to vilify him. Why are we trying to the good guys anyway? Can't we attack? Can't we gaslight? Can't we set narratives?
The British culture is dying and we should let it die on our terms. Why should we compassionate towards a nation that still treats us with derision? They talk about giving us economic aid and mock us about our rocket program. Don't defend the brits.
Rather than feeling sorry for them, think how we can act against them now that the situation is right. If our roles are reverse, what happens? Haven't you see in the past 75 years?
Time for a payback.
What I'm really glad about is that UK is drowning without even our intervention. If possible, we should make trade agreements that crush their traditional strengths even further and eat up their economy bit by bit without making it seem like an economic war.
Don't we have a lot of students going to UK to study in their colleges? Target the students to study in their important fields, then have them come here, set up their own companies and blow their economy. There are plenty of talented students who lack the money and would take up the condition. It'll simultaneously strength our economy while weakening theirs.
And why are acting like pussies when UK was so hinduphobic in Leincester? Flare up their muslims by some blasphemy crap, put them against the whites, give them a taste of their own medicine.
For what they've done to crores of Indians and continue to do so, UK should not have a good ending.
Even if he intended good for India, Churchill is ultimately an agent of the British Empire and worse, the hero of Brits. That alone is reason enough to vilify him. Why are we trying to the good guys anyway? Can't we attack? Can't we gaslight? Can't we set narratives?
The British culture is dying and we should let it die on our terms. Why should we compassionate towards a nation that still treats us with derision? They talk about giving us economic aid and mock us about our rocket program. Don't defend the brits.
Rather than feeling sorry for them, think how we can act against them now that the situation is right. If our roles are reverse, what happens? Haven't you see in the past 75 years?
Time for a payback.
What I'm really glad about is that UK is drowning without even our intervention. If possible, we should make trade agreements that crush their traditional strengths even further and eat up their economy bit by bit without making it seem like an economic war.
Don't we have a lot of students going to UK to study in their colleges? Target the students to study in their important fields, then have them come here, set up their own companies and blow their economy. There are plenty of talented students who lack the money and would take up the condition. It'll simultaneously strength our economy while weakening theirs.
And why are acting like pussies when UK was so hinduphobic in Leincester? Flare up their muslims by some blasphemy crap, put them against the whites, give them a taste of their own medicine.
For what they've done to crores of Indians and continue to do so, UK should not have a good ending.
