IAF says 'No' to Army's bid to control attack helicopters

AVERAGE INDIAN

EXORCIST
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
3,326
Likes
5,408
Country flag
New Delhi, Oct 5, 2012, (PTI) :

The IAF today said it has rejected Army's demand to have their own attack and medium-lift helicopters contending that the country can't afford to have these "little air forces" growing up to do their "own things".

The Army has been demanding the control over attack and medium-lift helicopters saying they are mainly used for supporting its operations and that is why should be under it.

The IAF operates two squadrons of Russian-origin Mi-35/25 attack choppers and is in the process of acquiring another one from the US in near future.

"Last year in May, when the previous Army Chief was there, the IAF had made an offer that it was willing to let them have their own attack helicopters but that was not accepted as they wanted medium-lift helicopter also for which we said no," Air Chief Marshal N A K Browne told reporters here.

He was asked about Army's demand for control over attack helicopters.

The IAF chief said the world over, there was integration between the armed forces over the use of assets though these were controlled by separate wings and that "was the way of future".

"We have no major objection except for the fact that this integration model around the world is working.... We can't have these little air forces growing and doing there own things. Tomorrow if the Coast Guard asks for submarines, will we give them submarines from the Navy," he asked.

Browne said Government of India in 1986 under Services integration rules had said medium-lift and attack helicopters would be with the IAF and that arrangement "is the one which is and will continue to remain valid."

The IAF chief said attack choppers had a dual role and were used not just for destroying tanks but also for taking down enemy aircraft, helicopters and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

He said the fleet of medium-lift helicopters including the Mi-17 choppers "is and will continue to remain under the command and control of the IAF."

IAF says 'No' to Army's bid to control attack helicopters
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
Both PLA GF and the US Army have medium and heavy lift helicopters.

So, that is not a valid point.
 

Zebra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
The IAF today said it has rejected Army's demand to have their own attack and medium-lift helicopters contending that the country can't afford to have these "little air forces" growing up to do their "own things

First of all, how come IAF can take objection for IA's demand, forget about "reject".

Second, since when IAF got such long nose and they start using it in the finance ministry's job!

:scared2:
 
Last edited:

sandy_3126

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
35
Likes
16
Let IAF own the aircrafts, let it fly under command of army. Better synergy is needed between the two
 

EzioAltaïr

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
257
Likes
74
New Delhi, Oct 5, 2012, (PTI) :

The IAF today said it has rejected Army's demand to have their own attack and medium-lift helicopters contending that the country can't afford to have these "little air forces" growing up to do their "own things".

The Army has been demanding the control over attack and medium-lift helicopters saying they are mainly used for supporting its operations and that is why should be under it.

The IAF operates two squadrons of Russian-origin Mi-35/25 attack choppers and is in the process of acquiring another one from the US in near future.

"Last year in May, when the previous Army Chief was there, the IAF had made an offer that it was willing to let them have their own attack helicopters but that was not accepted as they wanted medium-lift helicopter also for which we said no," Air Chief Marshal N A K Browne told reporters here.

He was asked about Army's demand for control over attack helicopters.

The IAF chief said the world over, there was integration between the armed forces over the use of assets though these were controlled by separate wings and that "was the way of future".

"We have no major objection except for the fact that this integration model around the world is working.... We can't have these little air forces growing and doing there own things. Tomorrow if the Coast Guard asks for submarines, will we give them submarines from the Navy," he asked.

Browne said Government of India in 1986 under Services integration rules had said medium-lift and attack helicopters would be with the IAF and that arrangement "is the one which is and will continue to remain valid."

The IAF chief said attack choppers had a dual role and were used not just for destroying tanks but also for taking down enemy aircraft, helicopters and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

He said the fleet of medium-lift helicopters including the Mi-17 choppers "is and will continue to remain under the command and control of the IAF."

IAF says 'No' to Army's bid to control attack helicopters
IAF is afraid that it will lose it's importance if the Army Aviation Corps are strengthened.

Look at the US Army Aviation.

Equipment of the United States Army - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cargo aircraft, attack helos, cargo helos, recon aircraft, and so much more.

And here we have IAF saying that it won't let IA control helos.
 

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
That is not a option IAF...

Army Should get...

200 LCH
30 Mi 17
200 ALH Dhruv
and some UAV's.. within the Next five years

No need to buy it from other countries...just use our own products...
 

EzioAltaïr

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
257
Likes
74
That is not a option IAF...

Army Should get...

200 LCH
30 Mi 17
200 ALH Dhruv
and some UAV's.. within the Next five years

No need to buy it from other countries...just use our own products...
Army is buying 114 LCH, 73 ALH (of which 32 have been delivered), and DRDO Nishant UAV (4 are in use).
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
This is concerning as this level of officer making such childish comments..

How IAF use attack helo is not necessary same as IA using it, there is not point arguing if one have requirement or need for such role..

Browne said Government of India in 1986 under Services integration rules had said medium-lift and attack helicopters would be with the IAF and that arrangement "is the one which is and will continue to remain valid."

The IAF chief said attack choppers had a dual role and were used not just for destroying tanks but also for taking down enemy aircraft, helicopters and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
First of all, how come IAF can take objection for IA's demand, forget about "reject".

Second, since when IAF got such long nose and they start using it in the finance ministry's job!

:scared2:
Turf wars. Its been an age old problem.

Let IAF own the aircrafts, let it fly under command of army. Better synergy is needed between the two
Huh? How does that work?

IAF wants to own and command the aircraft. It appears what IAF wants is to integrate itself in the Army's decision making process.

IAF won't mind if the Army owns the Helicopters as long as the command is with the IAF.

However, IMO, IAF should take the backseat in Army operations.

Give IA and IAF each as many attack helicopters as they want. Everybody, including Boeing, will be happy. :)
The problem is IAF wants everything. Say IAF has a requirement for a 100 Attack helicopters and IA has a requirement for 200. IAF wants to control all 300.
 
Last edited:

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
Browne said Government of India in 1986 under Services integration rules had said medium-lift and attack helicopters would be with the IAF and that arrangement "is the one which is and will continue to remain valid."
IA is changing its entire way of fighting, ie, its doctrine. Due to this change, they are requesting helicopters for their own use.

Integration is all fine, but the decision making is still faster when one group of decision makers is in charge of such important assets instead of two.

Maybe due to the new doctrine changes, the rules made in 1986 may no longer apply.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top