Amraam flies to twice the range.
I'll take a missile that can shoot down an aircraft at 80km with low PK than a missile that can't even reach that range.
What secret sauce does French has? They might make a missile thats 10% better but they price it 100% higher. And they can get away with it, because they don't really have to embroil themselves in any conflict alone. They can rely on their 'big daddy' for the heavy work while showing off their LVMH boutique made missiles. Economies of scale matter when a country goes to war.
A missile with PK 0.9 is always worse than two missiles with pk as low as 0.7
MICA is a 80km range missile, according to MBDA. At least one target was destroyed up to 67km in the late 90's by a Taiwan M2000. You can't imagine MICA don't evolved as AMRAAM...
French special sauce?
- a missile existing with 2 differents seekers, complicating the counter measures from the ennemy.
- a missile using long chord wings, for a longer range.
- a missile with a thrust vectorised motor, able to be a real short range high agility missile.
- a missile with a specialy accuate seeker (exercise missile currently hit the target) so the warhead is maller than AMRAAM one.
Agree with you about Qty versus pk.