You can't expect everyone to be George Fernandes and manohar parrikar. Kadi nandi is not as bad as nirmala tai or others though.I am sorry to say but this is defeatist mindset. Bar has been set by Manohar Parrikar ji and Rajnath Singh has fallen short by miles.
Keep the morale up ..Someone will take his place who will be same if not of better caliber ..I am not at ease since the news came... It's undigestable news....
IAF did not oppose theatre command, they objected to be treated as a side-branch of armed forces.I think Because IAF had opposed the idea of theatre command so he doesn't want to see anyone from IAF in that post.
Sir as far as jet engine Yes. However their turboshaft engine vk2500 is good and has proven in indian environment.Russian tech has become obselete especially their engine not reliable. This platform is not the ideal one for VVIP transport. However need to wait until the full reports are out
Vice Chief of Defence Staff Air Marshal Balbhadra Radha Krishna will be acting CDS, as far as Iam concerned, till new CDS is appointed.Stupid question? Can a civilian be CDS or it has to be a 4 star general ..
IAF does not want its squadrons binded to a particular theatre command.IAF did not oppose theatre command, they objected to be treated as a side-branch of armed forces.
IAF and Indian Navy were worried about Army domination once the position of CDS is created. To negate such fears, CDS Post must be rotated between Three Services. Unlike Pakistan where an Lieutenant General is appointed to the post of CJOSC.
IAF did not oppose theatre command, they objected to be treated as a side-branch of armed forces.
Jinko marna chahiye wo zinda reh jaate hai, veergati ko prapt bas wo hote hai jo is desh ke kaam aate hai.
View attachment 123897
They are still swimming in British piss ever since India got independence, let them drown in it together.In addition to the previous post where we could see another genrail make such a statement about karma.
Panag also bypassed govt info sources and declared the death.
I think that was just disrespectful.
Panag is a political partisan, but this was too low even for him.
Now if you remember, there was a a guy here who had argued that there was a lot of anti pathy towards rawat.
He said it was because of politicisation of army or something, didn't explain much.
This was some years ago I think.
Came across the comment while I was lurking here.
Panag had also raised it in an article in print.
So my question is, what to make of these disgraceful comments and other rumblings in the background?