Hypersonic Missiles

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
Western experts say these things for psyops so their military can extract more money from their govt. I have read thousands of such fell good reports regarding China but none of them are true .
So these Western govt and public are simply so stupid that they fell in the same trap for thousands times.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
Son, I see you are probably still wearing your diapers and wetting them as well.

There was an official reaction from the PLA when Brahmos regiments were stationed in Arunachal Pradesh. The statement acknowledged the threat from the Brahmos and characterised the deployment as being provocative. Why should the PLA react if the Brahmos was a dud and could be easily shot down.

And dont ask me to provide the source. You can Google it and do your own work.
The key word will be Brahmos deployment in Arunachal Pradesh.
Well, as an attacking weapon, any missile is treated as threat, no matter how obsolete it is. It is just like Iraq's ballistic missile in Gulf war. Even though it is based on 1960s Soviet missile and easy to intercept, but still, it was seen as a big threat.

So, Brahmos is a threat but not a kind of kill-all weapon imagined by Indians.

As far as the Aircraft Carrier killer missile is concerned why doesn't Beijing release a video of the actual strike on a moving ship. That will help clear the matter.
Why should Beijing do that? Giving in the tech details of missile's terminal manenuvor and seeker function?

We have released multiple videos of the Brahmos hitting both land and sea targets.
Not a surprise. Russians already exported their own version of this missile to the whole world. There is nothing for India to cover.
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
4,132
Likes
17,621
Country flag
Well, as an attacking weapon, any missile is treated as threat, no matter how obsolete it is. It is just like Iraq's ballistic missile in Gulf war. Even though it is based on 1960s Soviet missile and easy to intercept, but still, it was seen as a big threat.

So, Brahmos is a threat but not a kind of kill-all weapon imagined by Indians.



Why should Beijing do that? Giving in the tech details of missile's terminal manenuvor and seeker function?



Not a surprise. Russians already exported their own version of this missile to the whole world. There is nothing for India to cover.
uh oh troll is back with outrageous claims. Does this forum not ban trolls?
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag

DARPA's Operational Fires Ground-Launched Hypersonics program enters new phase
 

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag

LETHALFORCE

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,968
Likes
48,929
Country flag

US Air Force Likely About to Test-Fire ARRW Hypersonic Missile for First Time

like Brahmos from Sukhoi's
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
4,132
Likes
17,621
Country flag
few months ago Prof Anatoly Gubanov now Alexander Kuranov for trespassing data to china and America


https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021...ic-aircraft-chief-on-treason-suspicion-a74769
Clearly underpaid Russian scientists are being targeted with big money and offers. What is Russia’s strategy? China has tons of money to buy each and every Russian scientist. And they are right next door. Meanwhile Russia is conducting strategic exercises with China and is becoming more and more dependent on it, due to western sanctions on it, much like Iran is. Neither population wise nor economy wise Russia can compete with china. So what’s next for Russia in the long run? A full fledged China-dependent state? If yes, it is going to be tough to prevent Russian scientists from not making money from their knowledge.
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,558
Country flag
Hypersonic HAWC Missile Flies, but Details Are Kept Hidden

The Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) vehicle, developed under a partnership of the Air Force and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, made a free flight the week of Sept. 20, a DARPA spokesman said, but most details are being withheld. The vehicle, which was built by Raytheon Technologies with a hypersonic engine built by Northrop Grumman, flew faster than Mach 5, but DARPA declined to say how long the vehicle flew.
The HAWC is exploring air-breathing hypersonic flight in parallel with the Air Force’s AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid-Response Weapon (ARRW), which is accelerated to hypersonic speed by a rocket before being released and gliding toward its target.
 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,868
Likes
23,312
Country flag
Any DF-21 strike on a US carrier would be met with 24 hour around the clock nuclear strikes on China by OHIO subs and B2 and B-52’s from Guam and Hawaii ; Chinese eastern seaboard would disappear.
I don't think so. US would risk a carrier's loss than to invite M.A.D. Losing a CBG is better than no one winning and a ruined earth.

From what I have read, the carrier killer DF-21 will carry conventional warheads. Responding with nukes on mainland China would mean PLA Rocket Forces as well as PLAN SSBNs would unload their nukes on Uncle Sam's mainland as well. And the biggest paranoia that Uncle Sam has is that no one should strike their mainland.

The scenario of USA using nukes in 1945 is very different from anyone using nukes today. The one who initiates will see everyone's nukes hiting back at them. End of the planet as we know it basically.
 

Articles

Top