Guys What is true Thrust of JF-17 RD-93 engine??

[WARREN SS]

Well I have been on PDF there Admin is claiming its Wet thrust is 98 KN is This True ??
@Moderators Help Please I have been in argument Need Help @LETHALFORCE @Kunal Biswas
http://**********/attachments/thrust_to_weight-jpg.290516/

 

[salute]

10000kn.......................................................................

 

[WARREN SS]

10000kn.......................................................................

Its 98 KN but What There PAC Kamra Stated is 84.6 kN (19,000 lbf)

 

[WARREN SS]

@LETHALFORCE Please Help Me in this Regard

 

[LETHALFORCE]

http://research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/Klimov_RD-33


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[AbRaj]

RD-93
A variant used to power the JF-17 (FC-1). According to JF-17.com "The most significant difference being the repositioning of the gearbox along the bottom of the engine casing." The Klimov poster at Zhuhai 2010 airshow gave the thrust range of the engine to be 79 kN Dry to 98 kN Wet.[3]This was designed specifically for FC-1 with increased thrust and relocated gearbox compared to base RD-33's. Although the increase of thrust decreased the service life of RD-93 to 2200 hours from RD-33's 4000 hours. According to Air Commodore Mehmood engines are solid and reliable: “We’ve flown 7,000 hours with the engine and we haven’t had any problems”, he said

So they overhaul engine almost after every flight
Or its one time arrangement specially for airshows