Gilgit-Baltistan The Forgotten Kashmir

IndiaRising

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
2,788
Likes
9,592
Country flag
Read what I wrote and what have you responded to:

Perhaps you do not know that the troop allocation and changing the direction of attack during ongoing offensive operations are purely the domain of military commanders and not the politician. No one says that you need to reinforce this point or take that GTI. Politicians only give you broad objectives, not specify the troop strength or number of troops to send/allocation of air sorties for reinforcement of troops.

Let me know if your post above is any different other than paraphrasing?

Anyways.

Military strategy entails, broadly, defining of objectives that can be attained through military means, that 'enable' the furtherance of political objectives as defined by the dispensation in power at the time.

Military tactics, are dynamic in nature, and play the major role in actual execution of the strategy to attain those military goals.

Political Objective on 26th Oct 1947:

Defend the newly merged State of J&K against Pakistani Hordes and secure the territory

Military Strategy on 27th Oct 1947:

Secure and defend the sole air strip in Srinagar in order to enable air induction of troops till as such time:

1. Land routes could be secured.
2. Reinforcement of defences within valley could be undertaken
3. After securing point # 1 & 2, consolidate hold over the Kashmir Valley to provide a staging area for further operations to clear the territories of J&K

The whole derailment took place when members here failed to appreciate the fact that Indian Army and through it, Union of India, failed (and seeing here, still fail) to accept that Skardu was lost militarily due to failure to relieve them in time. Who decides which areas need to be strengthened/relieved/repositioned? The Politician? Or is it the battlefield commander?

Thanks
lets keep this short and simple. General Cariappa was against the ceasefire declared by Nehru.

Political objective: declare cease fire midnight 31st December/1st January 1948-49.”

Military response: Gen Cariappa was against the ceasefire and was confident Army would regain all of Kashmir.

When General Cariappa asked Nehru the reasons for the ceasefire later on, he responded "You see, U.N. Security Council felt that if we go any further it may precipitate a war. So, in response to their request we agreed to a ceasefire,” Nehru said. But he sportily added, “Quite frankly, looking back, we should have given you ten-fifteen days more. Things would have been different then.

Again, you need to learn the difference between a battle and a war. If you are going to analyze military campaigns based on these one-off setbacks, then you have a very myopic view of the Indian Army. Also, if you feel that you know more than Field Marshal Cariappa about the ongoings in the Valley at that time, I have nothing further to discuss.

I will add one more thing that Professor Mehta eloquently said in his article

"Vital military decisions get entangled in outmoded bureaucratic procedures. Over time, a wide gap is created between the political and army leadership, so much so that in the present crisis the Prime Minister refused to meet the Army Chief. The credibility of the political class is at its all-time low. Such dichotomy did not exist earlier and the differences were amicably resolved at the highest echelons of government and the army. Should our masters not mend their fences before it is too late?"

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/open-page/trust-our-generals-they-are-patriots/article3436815.ece
 
Last edited:

IndiaRising

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
2,788
Likes
9,592
Country flag
@Mikesingh Singh

The logic put forth by you so far, as far as I can understand is best extrapolated by the analogy as under (assuming you are from Infantry):

For a tactical reverse, Brig Bhoop Singh, from A Regiment, blames Col Bhoop Singh, CO of B Regiment, who, in turn, blames Maj Bhoop Singh of Alpha Company, which is of community Z, same as Maj Bhoop Singh's but different from Col Bhoop Singh's. In turn, Maj Bhoop Singh blames Nb Sub Bhoop Singh, Commander of his No 3 Platoon, who is from another State to that from Maj Bhoop Singh.

Nb Sub Bhoop Singh, in turn, blames Hav Bhoop Singh of No 2 Section, who is from a particular District different from his Platoon OC's who, as luck would have it, in turn blames Rifleman Bhoop Singh, who is from a different village than the Sectoin Commander's.

All this does not change the fact that all of the above are under 1 operational command and are fighting for the same country and at the end of the day, have suffered a Tactical Reverse.

You are a professional. Accept that all the forces that fight under your command, are yours. Accept also the fact that on Indian Army's overall operational command, loss of Gilgit (in Nov 1947) and Skardu (in Aug 1948), took place, and Indian Army failed to recapture these territories not for the want of trying, but failing to appreciate the importance of Skardu Airstrip, which was long enough for Dakotas to land after establishing an air bridge. You simply can not make an excuse of State forces etc. IA had the operational command, had the means, and the resources. It did not or failed to, make use of them.

That, is a military failure.
patently false. tactical failures do not decide the outcome of a war. By this logic, even The Battle of Chamb in 1971 will be proved a military failure of Indian Army when the real outcome was completely different.

PS: FM Cariappa's request for funds and manpower was only partially accepted, something that your analysis seems to leave out.
 
Last edited:

IndiaRising

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2014
Messages
2,788
Likes
9,592
Country flag
My last post on this topic.... after that people can decide for their own.
By this logic,
Initial setbacks in Kargil= military failure LOL

If A UN ceasefire had been announced right then and there, even General Malik would face the same situation as Field Marshal Cariappa. Being ignorant of the civil-military relationship produces such a myopic view of the Army’s history.
 

Hellfire

Professional
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
986
Likes
4,032
Country flag
lets keep this short and simple. General Cariappa was against the ceasefire declared by Nehru.

Political objective: declare cease fire midnight 31st December/1st January 1948-49.”

Military response: Gen Cariappa was against the ceasefire and was confident Army would regain all of Kashmir.

When General Cariappa asked Nehru the reasons for the ceasefire later on, he responded "You see, U.N. Security Council felt that if we go any further it may precipitate a war. So, in response to their request we agreed to a ceasefire,” Nehru said. But he sportily added, “Quite frankly, looking back, we should have given you ten-fifteen days more. Things would have been different then.

Again, you need to learn the difference between a battle and a war. If you are going to analyze military campaigns based on these one-off setbacks, then you have a very myopic view of the Indian Army. Also, if you feel that you know more than Field Marshal Cariappa about the ongoings in the Valley at that time, I have nothing further to discuss.

I will add one more thing that Professor Mehta eloquently said in his article

"Vital military decisions get entangled in outmoded bureaucratic procedures. Over time, a wide gap is created between the political and army leadership, so much so that in the present crisis the Prime Minister refused to meet the Army Chief. The credibility of the political class is at its all-time low. Such dichotomy did not exist earlier and the differences were amicably resolved at the highest echelons of government and the army. Should our masters not mend their fences before it is too late?"

Source: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/open-page/trust-our-generals-they-are-patriots/article3436815.ece
Skardu had an airstrip. Srinagar had an airstrip. IAF had the resources. IA had the troops.

I am simply asking you 2 questions:

1. Was failure to establish an air bridge to Skardu right till 14 August 1948, consequent to a political directive or failure of appreciation of the need to hold Skardu which could have provided similar 'base' for expansion of military effort in regaining? (I have cited where FM Cariappa opined withdrawal from Skardu)

2. Were military forces employed at Skardu, under command of Indian Army or not? If they were, did a political directive prevent launch of air effort to bolster them (since relief columns partially reinforced them and own operations to break through to them failed at some or the other level)?
 

Hellfire

Professional
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
986
Likes
4,032
Country flag
lets keep this short and simple. General Cariappa was against the ceasefire declared by Nehru.

Political objective: declare cease fire midnight 31st December/1st January 1948-49.”
Lets keep it shorter,

27 Oct 1947, I SIKH takes off from Safdarjung Airfield and lands at Srinagar. All forces in J&K come under military command of Indian Armed Forces.

14 August 1948 - Skardu falls in spite of Op Duck, Op Snipe (which never took off due to failures along Gurez-Taobat-Domel axes)

For almost 10 months, a vital node was left unreinforced in spite of relative air dominance due to non-involvement of PAF .........


Again, you need to learn the difference between a battle and a war. If you are going to analyze military campaigns based on these one-off setbacks, then you have a very myopic view of the Indian Army. Also, if you feel that you know more than Field Marshal Cariappa about the ongoings in the Valley at that time, I have nothing further to discuss.
We also had Lt Gen BM Kaul. Want to extrapolate that logic then?

I will add one more thing that Professor Mehta eloquently said in his article

"Vital military decisions get entangled in outmoded bureaucratic procedures. Over time, a wide gap is created between the political and army leadership, so much so that in the present crisis the Prime Minister refused to meet the Army Chief. The credibility of the political class is at its all-time low. Such dichotomy did not exist earlier and the differences were amicably resolved at the highest echelons of government and the army. Should our masters not mend their fences before it is too late?"
So, reinforcement of the vital node of Skardu got entangled in outmoded bureaucratic procedures? Let us then extrapolate the same to excuse in Kargil. Why was the Brigade Commander sacked? Winter cut off posts - no air maintenance sorties 'authorized' - all bureaucratic procedures.

My last post on this topic.... after that people can decide for their own.
By this logic,
Initial setbacks in Kargil= military failure LOL

If A UN ceasefire had been announced right then and there, even General Malik would face the same situation as Field Marshal Cariappa. Being ignorant of the civil-military relationship produces such a myopic view of the Army’s history.
Totally agreed. Political expediency calls for positioning ourselves as 'saviours' of J&K as opposed to realizing that after almost 14 months of conflict, we failed to retake our own territory, the raison d'etre of my statement:

"You claim GB, even when you emphatically lost it in military confrontation in 1948 and de-facto accepted the status as such by signing Karachi Agreement in 1949."

Oh my, was it a military confrontation?

Why not repackage it as a 'gallant defence'?

Forget that military commanders failed to appreciate the importance of Skardu for further offensive operations into Northern areas as Shamshabari was always a limiting factor for offensive operations into the region as only Bandipore-Tragbal-Rajdhani Pass (now called Razdhan Pass)-Kanzalwan-Bagtore along banks of Kishenganga dominated to the west by the Pakistani occupied Losar Complex led to Taobat as it still does (the fastest route) and Bandipore - Tragbal - Rajdhani Pass - Dak Ghar - Dawar - Domel track was the next fastest route!

And heaven help if Nehru should not be derided for military mistakes also, because he was hardly under any Diplomatic pressure politically after almost 14 months of fighting and was adept at military command, planning and execution. In fact, why not make it that FM Cariappa had orders to start the Scout Cars only after receiving direct orders from Nehru? Or that Nehru personally directed where the section was to be deployed and how the LMGs were to be sited!

By this skewed logic, I think 1962 was an emphatic victory for us - for we managed to get NEFA back ... 'forcing PRC to withdraw to McMahon Line with our solid war fighting'.

Yeah, I think even I have had enough discussing something in public domain that we discuss as an honest evaluation of our performance in war, within our forces.

Out.
 

Mikesingh

Professional
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
You are a professional. Accept that all the forces that fight under your command, are yours. Accept also the fact that on Indian Army's overall operational command, loss of Gilgit (in Nov 1947) and Skardu (in Aug 1948), took place, and Indian Army failed to recapture these territories not for the want of trying, but failing to appreciate the importance of Skardu Airstrip, which was long enough for Dakotas to land after establishing an air bridge. You simply can not make an excuse of State forces etc. IA had the operational command, had the means, and the resources. It did not or failed to, make use of them.

That, is a military failure.
You do keep insisting on the failure of establishing an 'airbridge' to Skardu resulting in a 'military failure' of gigantic proportions! Now read on.....


1. When HQ J&K Forces realised that air support was the only answer to save the garrison at Skardu, it requested No1 Operational Group to strike areas in the vicinity of Skardu between 24th and 27th Feb 48.

2. However, this request was not agreed to by HQ No1 Operational Group. Two main reasons were cited for rejecting this request.

(a) Non availability of twin engined aircraft. It was hazardous to attempt such a strike with single engine aircraft flying over 20,000 ft and 200 miles over extremely hostile terrain. What was needed was a twin engine machine which the RIAF did not have in its inventory at that time.

(b) Likelihood of damage to the aircrafts' oxygen system if flown over these heights. Western Command was seized of the matter and ordered that the garrison at Skardu will have to rely on its own strength until reinforcements of the ground forces arrive.

3. Western Command referred the matter to Air HQ. Air Marshal Elmhirst, Chief of Air Staff and AOC Royal Indian Air Force endorsed the views expressed by No1 Operational Group and wrote:


" I agree with SASO of No 1 Operational Group in that the Tempest is not suitable for attacks such as you require. The distance from Jammu to the target is 200 miles and the route lies over mountains rising to over 20,000 ft . Aircraft engaged in this sortie could carry only two rockets along with extra fuel tanks which would be fitted in place of bombs. An air strike that we may carry out under these conditions would hardly serve to check enemy pressure on the beleaguered garrison. Such doubtful gains make it hardly worthwhile to risk losing valuable aircraft and aircrew. The risk of losses in this particular instance is very high."

4. In April 1948, Lt Gen Cariappa mooted that in view of unsuitability of Dakota aircraft for reinforcement of troops, the RIAF could perhaps purchase three Viking aircraft which could be suitably modified. The matter was examined at length at the Air HQ and came to the conclusion that it was not a viable option.

5. However, sporadic raids by Tempests did continue till early August resulting in considerable enemy casualties as well as dropping supplies by air from the Tempests which were modified to carry rations in their fuel tanks as Dakotas could not be used.

6. Finally, Skardu had to fall because the garrison could not be supplied due to lack of suitable air assets as well as adverse weather conditions and the failure of relief columns of the J&K State Forces to reach Skardu.

And what of the reinforcements to Skardu by regular troops of the Indian Army? Could they have been sent?

It must be noted that there was a genuine shortage of army units and formations available to be moved into Kashmir Valley and tremendous logistical difficulties existed to sustain the forces deployed there with land routes remaining cut off in winter due to heavy snowfall.

To make matters worse, Pak had deployed 7 Infantry Division and 9 Frontier division with 6 brigades in GB code named OPERATION GULMARG a week before the Indian troops landed in Srinagar in OPERATION JAK on 27 Oct 1947. What could Skardu be reinforced with against Pak 10 Infantry Brigade advancing toward Kargil/Skardu from Tithwal? A company? A Battalion which would have taken weeks? Even if a battalion had managed to reach Skardu, how was it to be maintained when transport air support was a huge problem in the area?

Thus, establishing and maintaining an 'air bridge' as you mentioned was a non starter due to the reasons brought out above. So your contention that it was a military failure, is incorrect. You can't make impossible plans that cannot be implemented and then say it is a failure!!
 

Hellfire

Professional
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
986
Likes
4,032
Country flag
You do keep insisting on the failure of establishing an 'airbridge' to Skardu resulting in a 'military failure' of gigantic proportions! Now read on.....
Don't overyhype. I merely said we emphatically lost Skardu militarily. And you went ballistic as if it were a distortion of truth. Skardu was the key that could have enabled further offensive operations into the GB as a whole.

1. When HQ J&K Forces realised that air support was the only answer to save the garrison at Skardu, it requested No1 Operational Group to strike areas in the vicinity of Skardu between 24th and 27th Feb 48.

January 26, 1948, Wg Cdr KL Mathur (Retd) of 8 Sqn IAF flew in his tempest to Skardu and returned. This, when the period of Jan-Mar is of more days of bad weather than fair for flying.


2. However, this request was not agreed to by HQ No1 Operational Group. Two main reasons were cited for rejecting this request.

(a) Non availability of twin engined aircraft. It was hazardous to attempt such a strike with single engine aircraft flying over 20,000 ft and 200 miles over extremely hostile terrain. What was needed was a twin engine machine which the RIAF did not have in its inventory at that time.

(b) Likelihood of damage to the aircrafts' oxygen system if flown over these heights. Western Command was seized of the matter and ordered that the garrison at Skardu will have to rely on its own strength until reinforcements of the ground forces arrive.

3. Western Command referred the matter to Air HQ. Air Marshal Elmhirst, Chief of Air Staff and AOC Royal Indian Air Force endorsed the views expressed by No1 Operational Group and wrote:
" I agree with SASO of No 1 Operational Group in that the Tempest is not suitable for attacks such as you require. The distance from Jammu to the target is 200 miles and the route lies over mountains rising to over 20,000 ft . Aircraft engaged in this sortie could carry only two rockets along with extra fuel tanks which would be fitted in place of bombs. An air strike that we may carry out under these conditions would hardly serve to check enemy pressure on the beleaguered garrison. Such doubtful gains make it hardly worthwhile to risk losing valuable aircraft and aircrew. The risk of losses in this particular instance is very high."

4. In April 1948, Lt Gen Cariappa mooted that in view of unsuitability of Dakota aircraft for reinforcement of troops, the RIAF could perhaps purchase three Viking aircraft which could be suitably modified. The matter was examined at length at the Air HQ and came to the conclusion that it was not a viable option.

5. However, sporadic raids by Tempests did continue till early August resulting in considerable enemy casualties as well as dropping supplies by air from the Tempests which were modified to carry rations in their fuel tanks as Dakotas could not be used.

6. Finally, Skardu had to fall because the garrison could not be supplied due to lack of suitable air assets as well as adverse weather conditions and the failure of relief columns of the J&K State Forces to reach Skardu.
Service Ceiling of C-47 Dakotas - 26400 at 04 crews and 28 Troops.

Adjust according to load tables (we had the data from flying ops carried out over the 'Hump' in world war 2).

Average height of Shamshabari Range if you want to fly directly across Gurez - 14000 ft. Leh 11000 ft.

Landing of Leh was rammed down RIAF's throat.

"Sensing the danger to Leh 161 Infantry Brigade decided to send whatever meager relief it could across the Zoji La. An all volunteer Lahuli column of 40 men led Major Priti Chand, a Lahuli officer of 2 Dogra, set out from the Valley in mid-February. This column knew full well the hazards of crossing the Zoji La at the height of winter, indeed it had never been done in living memory. It was the sheer courage of these men, that saw them reach on 8 March 1948."

"Priti Chand sent out frantic appeals for airborne reinforcements to Divisional HQ in Srinagar. To facilitate this a Ladakhi engineer constructed an improvised airstrip at Leh. "

"Serious doubts were expressed about the ability of the IAF’s aged and battered Dakotas to fly into Leh. Even Air Commodore Mehar Singh, DSO, the daredevil Air Officer Commanding No.1 Operational Group in Kashmir was concerned about the Dakota’s efficacy. Major General Thimayya, then commanding the Kashmir area, saw no alternative to reinforcing the Leh by air and set out to convince Mehar Singh."

"Mehar Singh eventually accepted the challenge of flying into Leh and Thimayya opted to be on that first flight. Braving difficult terrain Mehar Singh and Thimayya landed in Leh on 24 May 1948, establishing beyond doubt that the Dakota was capable of opening an air bridge to Leh. "


And what of the reinforcements to Skardu by regular troops of the Indian Army? Could they have been sent?

It must be noted that there was a genuine shortage of army units and formations available to be moved into Kashmir Valley and tremendous logistical difficulties existed to sustain the forces deployed there with land routes remaining cut off in winter due to heavy snowfall.

To make matters worse, Pak had deployed 7 Infantry Division and 9 Frontier division with 6 brigades in GB code named OPERATION GULMARG a week before the Indian troops landed in Srinagar in OPERATION JAK on 27 Oct 1947. What could Skardu be reinforced with against Pak 10 Infantry Brigade advancing toward Kargil/Skardu from Tithwal? A company? A Battalion which would have taken weeks? Even if a battalion had managed to reach Skardu, how was it to be maintained when transport air support was a huge problem in the area?

Thus, establishing and maintaining an 'air bridge' as you mentioned was a non starter due to the reasons brought out above. So your contention that it was a military failure, is incorrect. You can't make impossible plans that cannot be implemented and then say it is a failure!!
Here:

1.JPG


Wait, HQ 161 Brigade of Indian Army?

And what is that? GOC of Indian Army's Srinagar based Division considered Skardu neither of strategic nor tactical value!!

I recall your first post

Now get hold of a map and check out where the LoC runs where the Indian Army was forced to halt its advance due to the ceasefire. It is nowhere near GB. So stop peddling fiction and misrepresenting facts that the India Army 'emphatically lost GB in a military confrontation in 1948', when the army wasn't there at all!
I thought you said that the army wasn't there at all? Am confused. So this Gentleman, an Air Force Officer by the name of Air Commoder Jasjit Singh, AVSM, VrC, VM is also indulging in hyperbole? What was it that you had said?

Your hyperboles are pretty amusing!
Amused?

Next:

2.JPG


With air bridge to Leh, one could have reinforced Skardu from May 1948 to 1st week of August 1948 (note, it is 1948 preceded by 1947; I know 1 SIKH came in on 27 Oct 1947 before you post that yet again for no logical reason at all) by flying down the Shyok valley. You can google up the map. Indeed, one C-47 was lost in the area I believe in 1948, will look it up. But read very carefully - Indian Army did not consider Skardu of strategic value. But apparently, Pakistan Armed Forces had no problem in using the smaller airfield at Gilgit, meant for light aircrafts, to bring in reinforcements and supplies.


3.JPG


4.JPG


There, the Indian Army even failed to consider taking Skardu.

Heaven help us if we call our failure to defend Skardu as an emphatic loss militarily because it was Nehru's responsibility to identify concentration areas, establishment of Logistics Support Areas (as they are called now) and working out the logistics to launch offensive operations into GB to retake our territories right?


Now I should start calling 1962 a great Indian Victory where we 'emphatically defended NEFA' ....
 
Last edited:

Mikesingh

Professional
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
In hindsight, even in war - we should, could and would have done this and could have done that never ends. Like the arguments after a hand of bridge - dissect, trisect, argue, rationalise, hypothesise, deduce, interpret, argue, debate, dispute, and feud like everyone else under the sun is an idiot who screwed it up, because if he had done it like such and such in spite of whatever, it could have been a winning hand.

Let's keep it as it is. You say we lost, I say we didn't. No point carrying on this inconclusive debate as we will never agree either way. So then, let's not waste time and effort and call it a day.

Out!



,
 
Last edited:

Hellfire

Professional
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Messages
986
Likes
4,032
Country flag
@Mikesingh

Military history is not anyone's exclusive domain. Nor is there any cause to claim an exclusive authority over facts.

Not agreeing to my contention is your personal viewpoint. But labeling it 'hyperbole' and trying to approach the matter as if you have the sole authority over the whole history, saying you are 'amused' & then failing to rebut, is the thing which has been more fascinating for me.

If you have something that rebuts the extracts I have posted from Air Commodore Jasjit Singh's works, which clearly indicate Indian Army's ownership of the action (or lack thereof) at Skardu (which you were trying to pass off as that of State Forces alone, clearly claiming no Indian Army was there), do so. Otherwise, at least do not be derisive of others as you have been and instead, present evidence to buttress your own perspective as it not being a military loss for India - something which Government of India and everyone else accepts and owns.

PS: You are a professional. Not the only one though.
 

Assassin 2.0

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
6,087
Likes
30,705
Country flag
ThePrint Logo


Home Opinion
Opinion
The politics, military tactics & geography behind how Pakistan won Gilgit-Baltistan from India
The original Himalayan blunder was committed as much by the Kashmir forces as by the Indian Army and India’s political leadership.

SANJAY DIXIT
30 August, 2019

Ghanche district, Gilgit-Baltistan | Commons
Ghanche district, Gilgit-Baltistan | Commons

The region of Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan, as we know it today, comprised of Gilgit Agency and Gilgit Wazarat back in 1947. The original ‘Himalayan Blunder’ (Himalayan Blunder is one term) was with regard to the Gilgit Agency and the Gilgit Wazarat, a fact that many might not remember today.

A lot has been written about the ‘Himalayan Blunder’ committed by India in 1962. But even more has been written about the blunders committed in the prosecution of the India-Pakistan war over Kashmir in 1947-48 — notable is the reference to the United Nations by Jawaharlal Nehru at the time when India was gaining momentum in the war. Poonch had been secured. Enemy forces had been chased away from the outskirts of Leh, and Kargil had been won back. India only needed a last push to capture Skardu back and take Muzaffarabad and Mirpur.

History would also tell you that Jammu and Kashmir was also the only princely state that was not under the charge of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. In December 1947, J&K was removed from the State Department under Patel and moved under the PM. Gopalaswamy Aiyangar, a minister without portfolio, was made in-charge. This led to Patel resigning from the Cabinet. Mahātmā Gandhi had to intervene and effect reconciliation.


Kashmir became a separate ministry under the government of India and came directly under the charge of then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in December 1947.

I would not belabour the oft-repeated events that predated the accession of Kashmir to India. I will begin from the point of accession.

Also read: Sardar Patel was adamant, give Kashmir to Pakistan, take Hyderabad. Nehru saved it: Soz

Sam Manekshaw’s account
There is a fine account by Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, then-director of military operations in the Army headquarters in the rank of a Colonel. General Sir Roy Bucher, the Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Army, sent Manekshaw to accompany V.P. Menon who was flying to Srinagar to get the Instrument of Accession of Jammu and Kashmir signed.

The Kabaili tribals were hardly 10–12 kilometres away from the Srinagar airfield. They came back on 25 October, and it is worth recalling in Manekshaw’s own words what happened the next morning in a meeting of the cabinet defence committee:

“At the morning meeting he handed over the (Accession) thing. Mountbatten turned around and said, ‘come on Manekji (He called me Manekji instead of Manekshaw), what is the military situation?’ I gave him the military situation, and told him that unless we flew in troops immediately, we would have lost Srinagar, because going by road would take days, and once the tribesmen got to the airport and Srinagar, we couldn’t fly troops in. Everything was ready at the airport.

As usual Nehru talked about the United Nations, Russia, Africa, God almighty, everybody, until Sardar Patel lost his temper. He said, ‘Jawaharlal, do you want Kashmir, or do you want to give it away’. He (Nehru) said, ‘Of course, I want Kashmir (emphasis in original). Then he (Patel) said, ‘Please give your orders’. And before he could say anything Sardar Patel turned to me and said, ‘You have got your orders’.

I walked out, and we started flying in troops at about 11 o’clock or 12 o’clock. I think it was the Sikh regiment under Ranjit Rai that was the first lot to be flown in. And then we continued flying troops in. That is all I know about what happened. Then all the fighting took place. I became a brigadier, and became director of military operations and also if you will see the first signal to be signed ordering the cease-fire on 1 January (1949) had been signed by Colonel Manekshaw on behalf of C-in-C India, General Sir Roy Bucher. That must be lying in the Military Operations Directorate.”

One more event of great momentous consequence had already taken place.

Maharaja Hari Singh’s forces broadly comprised of 50 per cent Muslims and 50 per cent Hindus. It is well documented that a large part of the Muslim elements of Mahārāja’s Army had revolted and joined the Pakistani Army in Poonch and Mirpur area.

This position was known both to the Army and the political leadership. However, they got so busy looking after Srinagar that they completely forgot about the Gilgit Agency and the Wazarat.

Also read: What Nehru wrote to Sardar Patel on Kashmir & its ‘oblivious’ Hindu Maharaja

Some history about J&K
A bit of historical background of Jammu and Kashmir may be called for at this point.

The princely state of Kashmir and Jammu (as opposed to J&K of today), up to the point of the partition had five main regions — Jammu with Jammu as headquarters; Kashmir with Srinagar as headquarters; Ladakh with Leh as summer headquarters, and Skardu as winter headquarters; Gilgit Wazarat with Astore as headquarters; and Gilgit Agency on a 60-year lease to the British from 1935.

Gilgit Agency comprised of Chilas, Gilgit, Yasin, Ghizr, Iskoman, Hunza and the Nagar valley. All areas east of Bunji were in the Wazarat which was directly administered by the Mahārāja, with Astore as the HQ. The Deosai plains, Minimargh, the Burzil Pass, and parts of the Shingo Valley were in the Gilgit Wazarat. As the ‘Great Game’ was unfolding in Central Asia, and Britain was getting more obsessed with the threat of communist Soviet Union, so they thought it fit to administer the areas of Maharaja’s province lying west and south of Bunji directly and accordingly took it on lease in 1935, and named it Gilgit Agency.

As the Indian Independence Act was passed by the British Parliament on 13 July 1947 (received royal assent on 18th) and the date of transfer of power to India and Pakistan was set to 15 August, Lord Mountbatten decided to let go of the Gilgit Agency lease.

On 1 August, the responsibility of administration of Gilgit was passed back into the hands of the Maharaja — a responsibility he was simply not up to discharge. He had a British Chief of Army Staff, Major General Scott. Scott had just two battalions around Gilgit – Gilgit Scouts, which was a British force; and the 6th Kashmir Infantry. Its two battalions were stationed around 50 kilometres away from each other at Bunji on the eastern bank of Indus river in the Wazarat area.

Gilgit Scouts was an all-Muslim force. It had one headquarters company stationed in Gilgit along with ten platoons contributed by the various Rajas. The 6th Kashmir Infantry at Bunji on the left bank of Indus had two Dogra and Sikh companies and one Muslim company. General Scott sought a British officer to command the Gilgit Scouts as the force comprised of only Muslims and a Hindu chief might have found it difficult to command it, and for obvious reasons, he felt a Muslim could not be trusted in the situation that prevailed.

So, Scott marshalled his resources and got a British Captain who was then posted in Chitral, and also accepted his recommendation to have another British officer work under him at Chilas.

Also read: Kashmir was never just a 1947 problem, it is a 5,000-year old battle of histories

Pakistan’s advantage
The biggest advantage that Pakistan had over India in Kashmir was that there was not a single road or rail route that connected India with Jammu and Kashmir. Srinagar was accessed from Rawalpindi, through Murrie and Muzaffarabad (the road to Muzaffarabad bypasses Murrie today).

Poonch road passed through the town of Gujrat (in present-day Pakistan) after crossing the Chenab river at Wazirabad. Even the road to Jammu passed through Amritsar-Sialkot. Jammu had a limited railway transport link too. It ran from the Wazirabad railway junction on the main Lahore-Rawalpindi broad gauge line through Sialkot to Jammu. Gilgit and Skardu were both accessed through Rawalpindi-Abbottabad road, which crossed into Gilgit Agency at the 4200-metre Babusar pass and joined the Indus at Chilas, the headquarters of Diamer district today in Gilgit-Baltistan.

If the Babusar pass was closed due to snow, then there was the alternative route along the Indus valley which is the present alignment of the Karakoram Highway.

From Chilas, the road went up to Bunji on the left bank and crossed the Indus at Bunji, then went up to the place where the Gilgit river joins the Indus, from where Indus upstream goes further north until it hits the Karakoram range and turns south-east near Sassi.

Indus then goes on to Skardu, from where another road along Indus, Shingo and Suru valleys joins it with Kargil. The other route took off from the Gilgit-Indus confluence and went up to the Shandur pass in the West from where it crossed into Chitral, a Muslim Princely State.

The Hunza river meets the Gilgit river at Gilgit. The road along Hunza valley led to the Maharaja’s vassal states of Hunza and Nagar. The present Karakoram Highway is along this alignment going further into Chinese Turkestan (Xinjiang) over the Khunjerab pass.

The Gilgit-Indus confluence has the unique geographical feature of three of the greatest mountain ranges — Himalayas, Karakoram and Hindukush converging at one place.

The route from Jammu to Gilgit and Skardu via Srinagar was open only during summers as it was not possible to cross the Pir Panjal during the winters. Also, going to Gilgit Wazarat’s capital Astore involved crossing the rivers Sind and Kishanganga, before going up to the Burzil Pass through Mini Margh.

Also read: Pakistan needs to stop thinking of Kashmir as an unfinished business of Partition

The big blunder
Even the flights in small turboprop planes had to first go to Peshawar from Srinagar before refuelling and taking the route up along the Indus valley.

It is here that the big blunder took place.

Major William Alexander Brown, the commander of the Gilgit Scouts, had one singular merit, not unlike many other Englishmen. He kept a diary. This was later published as his memoirs.

A look through the memoirs reveals his mindset. Right from day one of him taking over as the commander at Gilgit, he had a political agenda. When the lease of Gilgit Agency was prematurely terminated by Lord Mountbatten and Maharaja Hari Singh formally resumed control over his territory, Major Brown was inducted as an officer of the Kashmir and Jammu Army.

Brigadier Ghansara Singh of the Maharaja’s Army was sent in as the governor. Brown derided him as an incompetent and lazy person. Brown’s memoirs cannot be taken at their face value as he was always scheming against the Maharaja.

In early September, he had decided to support Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan. He mentioned in his diary that he had his mind made up that in case Maharaja decided to accede to India, he would be with his Muslim soldiers and would mount a mutiny.

Brigadier Ghansara Singh did not size up the situation well. The 6th Kashmir Infantry based at Bunji had three companies, one of which was a Muslim company. Everyone knew how Muslim elements had deserted the Kashmir forces in various mutinies that were staged from Poonch to Muzaffarabad to Baramula. Gilgit Scouts had an unconventional formation of a headquarters company and ten platoons. These were widely spread over Gupis, Chilas and Gilgit.

Also read: Three strands of a diplomatic hurdle India needs to watch out for after Kashmir wrangle

India’s gaffe
After the accession had been achieved and Indian troops had taken control, Gilgit should have been immediately secured through an air bridge as was Srinagar.

Had Gilgit been secured, every other garrison in Gilgit-Baltistan would have become safe, including Skardu and Ladakh Agency. This blunder was committed as much by the Kashmir forces as by the Indian Army and India’s political leadership.

Gilgit had a small airstrip, which could have taken small aircraft, but Skardu had a fairly long airstrip. An airlift of the size which occurred in Srinagar was militarily not possible, but induction of Indian Army and its commanders was an urgent task, that could have been achieved through small planes.

As things transpired later on, Major Brown led the mutiny of Gilgit Scouts, as he had intended to, from November onwards. He arrested Kashmir’s Governor Brigadier Ghansara Singh. Even the Muslim elements of 6th Kashmir Infantry mutinied, as they had already been compromised by Major Brown.

The remaining members of the Kashmir Infantry were chased away from Bunji, and Pakistan flag was unfurled at Gilgit on 1 November 1947. For three weeks, Gilgit was an independent entity until Pakistan sent its governor there. Thus, the way was opened for the whole of Gilgit and a major part of Baltistan to be occupied by Pakistan.

Major Brown directed the entire operations into Gilgit-Baltistan until he was relieved in January 1948. After the fall of Gilgit, every man in Kashmir knew that Skardu would be the next target.

General Thimayya is on record that he considered Skardu to be the last frontier in the battle to save Ladakh. Yet, no airlift occurred until the Kashmir forces in Skardu under that great soldier Sher Jung Thapa had been besieged in February by Gilgit Scouts and Chitral Bodyguards.

This failure to resupply and relieve the garrisons at Gilgit and Skardu immediately after the airlift of Srinagar were great military blunders, besides political ones.

A sagacious Army commander, which General Sir Roy Bucher probably was, should have proceeded to defend Skardu and Gilgit through an air bridge. We are, however, not sure how much of his heart he had in this war. He is also blamed to this day for not moving on Mirpur when Poonch was under siege in 1947-48.

Pakistanis similarly blame General Sir Douglas Gracey, the Pakistan Commander-in-Chief. It was a great error of judgment on part of the Maharaja to entrust his forces to British officers, and to place trust in Muslim companies and battalions when they were deserting everywhere.

Also read: Pakistan & China are building an SEZ in PoK’s Gilgit-Baltistan, satellite images show

The present situation
The saga of rape and murder of Indians in Bunji and Skardu need to be retold today so that people would know how Pakistani forces fight, and how misplaced their sense of fair play is when it comes to Pakistan, whether with their forces or their public.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval have sized up the situation correctly. I am sure that if it had been Modi and Doval in 1972, they would not have let the advantage of having 90,000 prisoners of war go without wresting away some major part of Pakistan, or without breaking up Pakistan. A War Crime Tribunal would have broken up Pakistan at that time.

My two bits about the present situation is that this great Ummah feeling has completely disappeared from Gilgit-Baltistan today. Shias and Ismailis are persecuted, and Sunnis are being increasingly seen as a colonising force.

We need not have any illusions about the population in these parts. But it is certain that the way to conquer Pakistan Occupied Kashmir is not through Muzaffarabad but through Khapalu and Skardu. India will have to militarily conquer PoK not through the Jhelum, but through the Shyok.

This is true not only in territorial terms but also in terms of capturing the minds of people. The areas of Baltistan conquered by the Ladakh Scouts in 1971, under the redoubtable soldier Colonel Chewang Rinchen, are today completely amalgamated in the Indian Union. If the 1971 war had lasted another week, Ladakh Scouts would have liberated Skardu as well. The Nubra segment in the parliamentary constituency of Ladakh overwhelmingly voted for a BJP candidate in the 2019 general elections.

Let us hope for taking the Khapalu, Skardu, and Shigar area in the Indian Union soon. After that, Shaksgam Valley, ceded to China by Pakistan in 1963, would be thrown open.

The author is the additional chief secretary, Rajasthan and former secretary of the Rajasthan Cricket Association. Views are personal.
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top