- Aug 5, 2021
What time period are you even talking about? 1947? 19th century? Before that?Non sense, Most of the Sikh soldiers are from Hindu families.
Sikhs actually protected Hindus in the present day Pakistan against Islamic barbarians. I do not see any issue when Sikhs say they protected Hindus.
Mughal and the so called Islamic Barbarism needs to be put in place in Indian history.
I am talking about the period when Sikhism began and how it could never have progressed or amounted to anything without the help of Hindus. As for modern times, during 1947 Islamists were killing any Kuffars they could find, Hindu or Sikh. So, it was natural that Hindus and Sikhs fought together against Sullas.
Nobody "saved" Hindus, we were never in any need to be "saved or protected". The people who claim otherwise are either hopelessly ignorant or willful liars, seeking validation for their past.
Without the help of Hindu kings and their teachings of warfare, Sikhism would have never become a fighting race. This is a fact. If "Sikhs saved Hindus, then it would be equally true that "Without the aid of Hindus, Sikhism would have collapsed".
Also, before saying something is "nonsense", provide your references.