- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 31,122
- Likes
- 41,042
More like SU-33..^^^^^ This is exact copy of SU-27!! Shame on China!!
More like SU-33..^^^^^ This is exact copy of SU-27!! Shame on China!!
I must say, it looks exactly like the Su-30/33/35 variants...
Gotta give it to the Chinese, guys !! They sure as hell are the perfectionist when it comes to copying stuff , be it anything !! Look at the J-11 and the SU-27 and now this, SU-33 and the J-15 ! I predict a day when the Chinese will copy from others and sell the copied stuff back to them ! :emot15:
Certainly its a rip-off. From what angle doesn't it resemble Su-33? Everything! wing design, canards, engine and exhaust placement, horizontal and vertical stabilizers cockpit position; everything is a ditto of the Su-33. And how on earth is this a semi-stealth fighter? Even if we take 15% composites in its structure, look at the size of this fighter. Its shape, its aerodynamics, external storage, no nozzle covers, etc everything is like a typical conventional Su-27 series fighter. Making the same design out of Chinese composites and metals doesn't make it "China-made".
What amazes me is that why Russians aren't up in arms for filing a case of IPR violations. Had F-15 been copied, US would've gone berserk!
^^^^^ This is exact copy of SU-27!! Shame on China!!
SU-33 is based on SU-27 platform!
More like SU-33..
i think the ariticle already indicate the airframe is copy of su33, but the internal avionc, radar, electronic are chinese made. just because the apperance look same does not mean a direct copy, i'm sure chinese work on alot on internal stuff etc.Certainly its a rip-off. From what angle doesn't it resemble Su-33? Everything! wing design, canards, engine and exhaust placement, horizontal and vertical stabilizers cockpit position; everything is a ditto of the Su-33. And how on earth is this a semi-stealth fighter? Even if we take 15% composites in its structure, look at the size of this fighter. Its shape, its aerodynamics, external storage, no nozzle covers, etc everything is like a typical conventional Su-27 series fighter. Making the same design out of Chinese composites and metals doesn't make it "China-made".
What amazes me is that why Russians aren't up in arms for filing a case of IPR violations. Had F-15 been copied, US would've gone berserk!
Do you seriously believe what you wrote? Come now, be reasonable.i think the ariticle already indicate the airframe is copy of su33, but the internal avionc, radar, electronic are chinese made. just because the apperance look same does not mean a direct copy, i'm sure chinese work on alot on internal stuff etc.
like the article said the internal avionic, electronic are chinese made. a direct copy is copy EVERYTHING. and i already said the airframe is a copy, so what were you saying?Do you seriously believe what you wrote? Come now, be reasonable.
Thats something new....i never heard of this....like the article said the internal avionic, electronic are chinese made. a direct copy is copy EVERYTHING. and i already said the airframe is a copy, so what were you saying?
its easier and cheap way to do it. why spend billions on R&D and decade of time when the product already exist. when it come to national security, there is no right or wrong, pretty much true for any country.Thats something new....i never heard of this....
New internal parts within an old outer design....but if they could master the internal electronics and avionics then why couldn't they put it in a new airframe altogether...shouldn't the airframe be easier to design if they can build the internal avionics etcetra.
It saves time and money using old airframe. It takes years of effort to come up with a new airframe. China dont have the time. Even with the old airframe, it will take her years to scramble enough jets to fly off the carrier.
Imagine if they had to redesign the whole thing.....
Why hurry?It saves time and money using old airframe. It takes years of effort to come up with a new airframe. China dont have the time. Even with the old airframe, it will take her years to scramble enough jets to fly off the carrier.
Imagine if they had to redesign the whole thing.....
It is not an excuse , it is an explanation. Someone asked for the reasons. I provided the answer. And you provided entertainment with your trolling as usual.What a excuse. we call this
" yk to chori upper se sena jhori" can any member explain this to chini members
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Launch photo of China's DF-5B 8-MIRV ICBM | IHS Jane's | China | 0 | ||
China lifts 17-year ban on Dalai Lama photos at Tibet monastery | China | 3 | ||
M | 1962, India-China War Memories in Photos | Military Multimedia | 54 | |
China: Year review in photos 2011 | General Multimedia | 3 |