MiG-29SMT
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
- Messages
- 4,124
- Likes
- 5,108
one is Mexican one is India, Mexican one Yanet Garcia, Indian Vydia BalanShe is not Mexican though
one is Mexican one is India, Mexican one Yanet Garcia, Indian Vydia BalanShe is not Mexican though
Na ananya pandey is her name and she is a real struggler as far as her acting carrear is concernedone is Mexican one is India, Mexican one Yanet Garcia, Indian Vydia Balan
this is off topic but you have posted this pic twice and written about who is beautiful. So I will reply.
She works building jet engines for Safran in Queretaro Mexico , you work in propaganda for the CCP
She told me you are fake sexylady, you are a guy juck!
She told me she is really a sexylady
no no, China is RED and yellow/gold. It is NOT black and white. If you are seeking a thief go find all blacks and whites.
you cannot call my bitch a "bitch". That,s my copy right... I know superior Hans do not care of IPR but still i love my bitch...I didn't knew china have another client for engine than their pet bitch Pakistan ?
Man,
My point was not about promoting a racial stereotype, but about she was working in a jet engine factory of Safran and is a woman working for aviation in the high tech area to feed her family.this is off topic but you have posted this pic twice and written about who is beautiful. So I will reply.
This is part of how people are different. You find her to be beautiful. Others might not. If those poor Mexican women are so beautiful why don't wealthy men from India, China or Europe flood into Mexico seeking wives and lives? Miss Venezuela often wins Miss Universe pageants, Venezuela is dirt poor now. Still very few men go migrate there or go seeking wives/relationships.
Africa has a similar situation. Huge numbers of poor young women, lots of opportunities but still don't see many wealthy Chinese and Indians migrating there.
Different people, different tastes.
cool. Glad she is working. Hope she enjoys her work and does well.My point was not about promoting a racial stereotype, but about she was working in a jet engine factory of Safran and is a woman working for aviation in the high tech area to feed her family.
His true intention is boast, claim his arrogance and military weapons only destabilize the world peace, no government in the world is perfect, but the Chinese governments is one of the most oppressive governments and at this moment pretty a threat to world peace.
China got most of its tech via tech transfers, legal or ilegal tech transfers, but at the end of the day technology is to share and all the humans we should cooperate and all we should have humility, he is boasting and he has shown hate to white America the place he lives and has given him a home
Again you are lack of basic knowledge, you just wanna know your version of conclusion.C919 has GE-Safran engine, your airbus plant has given you the ability to build C919 since you have copied by tech transfers
There are lots of subsystem from C919, not only from pure forgien vendor, but also from joint-venture companiese bewteen China and US and EU.but Europe and the USA have not given you the subsystems, that is why you use LEAP engines which are far more advanced to your copycats engines and are returning the investment.
If we don't launch C919, Airbus might won't setup plant since they would sale the plane from EU anyway.to your copycats engines and are returning the investment.
I think in general we have to be understanding most Indian posters do not take J-10 sold to Pakistan like a good development, in reality it is a big disastercool. Glad she is working. Hope she enjoys her work and does well.
These comments might point towards how people of different cultures react, behave and express themselves differently. We barely understand our own families lets alone people of different cultures.
Different cultures...what you or I see as a boast might be the cultural norm of expressing and showing off success. Perhaps stemming from the idea that success breeds success and envy will make everyone else work even harder.
"hating" white people and America...most of us say crazy bs on our bad days. Remember Ariana Grande saying she hates America and Americans? I doubt she does more likely a childish attempt to impress the boy she was with.
China's rise....good to look at it like NAFTA. NAFTA had winners and losers but in general we have a heck of a lot more, better and nicer stuff than we did before NAFTA. All three gained. China makes everyone gain. Fear of change, competition and "foreigners" almost destroyed NAFTA too.
In general I am not opposed for China to grow, not even you have your industry.Again you are lack of basic knowledge, you just wanna know your version of conclusion.
C919 project started in 2006.
中国大飞机C919什么时候开始立项的?_百度知道
中国大飞机C919什么时候开始立项的?2006年1月,立项。将大型飞机项目列为国家中长期科技规划的16个重大专项之一。首型国产大飞机将命名为“919”。第一个“9”的寓意是天长地久,“19”代表的是中国首型大型客机最zhidao.baidu.com
Airbus plant in Tianjing established in 2017.
Airbus in China
After establishing its official presence in 1994, Airbus has rapidly grown the company’s Chinese operations – which include the Tianjin final assembly line for A320 Family aircraft.www.airbus.com
There are lots of subsystem from C919, not only from pure forgien vendor, but also from joint-venture companiese bewteen China and US and EU.
View attachment 138184
View attachment 138185
If we don't launch C919, Airbus might won't setup plant since they would sale the plane from EU anyway.
And we have no bargin power on pricing, China's C919 project must done something right...
C919: what is China’s home-grown alternative to Airbus, Boeing duopoly, and why is it important?
What is China’s home-grown C919 aeroplane, and why is it important?
China’s government formed the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (Comac) in 2008 to design and construct the single-aisle C919 to reduce reliance on Europe’s Airbus and the United States’ Boeing.www.scmp.com
question Do you have a girlfriend? how many times you have sex a week?What retarded posts from a Mexican weirdo.
Look at GE, SAFRAN, Airbus and Boeing. They have design centers, entire plants and tens of thousands of employees in China. China is already "cooperating" in a massive scale.
What kind of weirdo thinks that having GE Aviation with 27 plants and design centers in China, over 12K employees in China and sourcing engine parts including blades from China and thinks that China is not "cooperating" enough?
Having SAFRAN with 20 centers and 6 plants (joint venture) making engine parts in China is not "cooperation"?
Having an entire Airbus assembly plant (only Airbus plant outside the EU and US) is not enough "cooperation"?
Having the only Boeing plant outside America is not "enough" cooperation?
Having every major western aviation firms in joint ventures making subsystems for C919 is not enough "cooperation"?
Having Russia as joint partners for CR929 is not "cooperation"?
That cooperation helps China's industry. The skills obtained at the GE and SAFRAN plants in China and the ecosystem developed around sourcing for them help AECC with the CJ500/1000/2000.
The skills and standards at the Airbus plant in Tianjin and the Boeing plant in Zhoushan bleed into COMAC and helps with the C919.
The difference between China and Mexico is China cooperates at a bigger scale AND China's has its own planes and engines programs.
The difference is Mexicans just "cooperate" in working for foreign companies making foreign products. China cooperates with foreign companies in making Chinese products.
Come on! You looked at the C919 with all its western contractors and the CR929 in partnership with Russia and then say something stupid like no one cooperates with China?!
What a weirdo
Sometimes, the tech transfer also would be a win-win solution, one good example is the civil nuclear area.In general I am not opposed for China to grow, not even you have your industry.
China has had a very good policy to get tech transfers, any one investing in China has to have a Chinese partner and get some tech transfers from the investor benefiting the Chinese partner.
When that is legal, China does right, is a bad policy, no it is not pretty much is a good policy.
Why China has grown? well first western greed, Chinese protectionism, lots of engineers in China and people studying in China.
When China steals, not good.
In Mexico we do not ask tech transfers to the investors, in fact not even a partner, however there are some rules to sell and rules to export to Canada or the USA. In Mexico capitalism demands if a Mexican brands wants to become supplier market rules are followed, they must have quality, we do not force investors
Jet engine design is not something cheap, nor doable without sales, good if China tries by themselves , they might even succeed to some degree, however most successful programs are international cooperation ones
Not just nukes but aircraft too.Sometimes, the tech transfer also would be a win-win solution, one good example is the civil nuclear area.
Frence is used to have best civil nuclear tech, but due to many reasons, they still hold some core technologies, but failed to have ability to construct new project, since the supply chain of civil nuclear is as complicated as aviation industry, but the market is quite limited.
The result is they with China CGN, and obtaining the market together, the French company becomes subcontructor to CGN.
U.K. Approves Chinese Nuclear Reactor for CGN’s Bradwell Plant
Even 10 years ago, i can't imagine China would help UK empire to build a N-power plant, but it's going to happen. So for C919, who knows who would buy them after 20 yrs?
As you said you are 50 yrs old now, I don't know how you view your nation for last 3 decades development. But as I m 42 yr old now, after my gradation from college, most of my expectations on Chinese industry capability just came true. From this point, i really think we are not in the same generation in mindset.
Of couse, this kind of N-game is onlly available between Big5 of UN, other nation might even don't have any lisence.
that is correct, tech transfer are the way to go, but you have to see not all the countries have the same viewSometimes, the tech transfer also would be a win-win solution, one good example is the civil nuclear area.
Frence is used to have best civil nuclear tech, but due to many reasons, they still hold some core technologies, but failed to have ability to construct new project, since the supply chain of civil nuclear is as complicated as aviation industry, but the market is quite limited.
The result is they with China CGN, and obtaining the market together, the French company becomes subcontructor to CGN.
U.K. Approves Chinese Nuclear Reactor for CGN’s Bradwell Plant
Even 10 years ago, i can't imagine China would help UK empire to build a N-power plant, but it's going to happen. So for C919, who knows who would buy them after 20 yrs?
As you said you are 50 yrs old now, I don't know how you view your nation for last 3 decades development. But as I m 42 yr old now, after my gradation from college, most of my expectations on Chinese industry capability just came true. From this point, i really think we are not in the same generation in mindset.
Of couse, this kind of N-game is onlly available between Big5 of UN, other nation might even don't have any lisence.
Hyrsa Mexican companyThe techniques and standards at COMAC plants in Shanghai and the Airbus/Boeing plants at Tianjin and Zhoushan are the same because there is cross pollination across the Chinese aviation industry.
It would be the same with the engine teams at AECC and the teams at SAFRAN centers in Guiyang or Suzhou:View attachment 138303
View attachment 138304
View attachment 138305
This is how China advances