DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
6,021
Likes
11,383
Country flag
that comment was like some 2-3 weeks old. so it took you 2-3 weeks to study and answer back again.
Well, I was battling another stupidity in form of Chinese Virus. So I let go off others for the time being.


i used 40 tonne as a figure of speech to represent medium mass category tanks. if you want to be a grammer nazi, fine then. we also deployed 14.3 tonne BMP-2/2k not just vajra and T-90S. also i said Tonne not Ton. both are different. since you want to argue on particulars rather than the concept.
Yes. That's a good thing to say. You are concerned about 93 kg, but not with 9071 kg.

so what? if we deploy 3 vehicle convoy.
the vehicles travel on ground separately. they don't piggy back on each other. ground pressure is what matters not the overall mass. overall mass matters during transportation.


the enemy isn't pakistan terrorists. the enemy is a fully equipped chinese army.
they don't use small bunkers to hide, attack and run away.

you need a weapon that is capable of area destruction not point destruction like artillery guns.
I could see why our engineers sucks in giving a practical design now.



i don't need to hear about battlefield requirements from a scientist. i would hear it from army staff.
i don't need to hear about engineering designs from army. i would hear it from an armament engineer or a scientist.

View attachment 93081
View attachment 93082

solid ducted ramjet technology is still in adolescence stage. china won't wait until 2030's or 40's for us to develop & deploy ramjet artillery



why do you need extended range artillery guns when you yourself pointed out that its more of a close combat warfare. you contradicted yourself.
If you for once have read about the Ramjet artillery program of India, you would have known that the person whose interview you have quoted is the same person who is leading the Ramjet artillery program, Lt Gen P Ravi Shankar, Professor of Practice at IIT,M. So rest in peace.

As for the last line, I mentioned that when you want artillery fire support within 10's of meter of your position, it is the guns which is going to provide you that, not rockets. Its not like when enemy is within 100 meter of you in a mountain, you would ask for rockets on that position. Imprint this on your knowledge bank.

BTW, have you heard about MBPKS? Go and read about it. Its the new weapon system IA wants especially for mountain warfare.
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
6,021
Likes
11,383
Country flag
As for countering phl 03, smerch-m replacement is in the making ( 300 mm class)

As for the chinese 600-760mm class ie., df 12 and another new missile in development
Our ans is pralay. As of now all we have is prithvi but its too old

@Chinmoy ji, any update on pralay and smerch-m replacement
Will the range of the repalcement be >150 km?
DRDO is working on a 300mm rocket, but when it would come out is for anyone to guess.
 

airstrike99

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2021
Messages
1,082
Likes
4,643
Country flag
Well, I was battling another stupidity in form of Chinese Virus. So I let go off others for the time being.




Yes. That's a good thing to say. You are concerned about 93 kg, but not with 9071 kg.



I could see why our engineers sucks in giving a practical design now.





If you for once have read about the Ramjet artillery program of India, you would have known that the person whose interview you have quoted is the same person who is leading the Ramjet artillery program, Lt Gen P Ravi Shankar, Professor of Practice at IIT,M. So rest in peace.

As for the last line, I mentioned that when you want artillery fire support within 10's of meter of your position, it is the guns which is going to provide you that, not rockets. Its not like when enemy is within 100 meter of you in a mountain, you would ask for rockets on that position. Imprint this on your knowledge bank.

BTW, have you heard about MBPKS? Go and read about it. Its the new weapon system IA wants especially for mountain warfare.
I could see why our engineers sucks in giving a practical design now.
engineers design based on army requirements. army doesn't even know what it exactly wants. just with HAL marut and MBT 80 or MBT chetek or MBT arjun etc (5 times design changes because it doesn't know what it wants). it will just see what americans and russians are procuring and will do the same. name one destruction weapon system that it uses uniquely. just one.

So rest in peace.
no u.

If you for once have read about the Ramjet artillery program of India, you would have known that the person whose interview you have quoted is the same person who is leading the Ramjet artillery program, Lt Gen P Ravi Shankar, Professor of Practice at IIT,M.
i already know about it. it will take another 20 yrs to be in practice and army baaboos will kill it and buy rusky maal.

As for the last line, I mentioned that when you want artillery fire support within 10's of meter of your position, it is the guns which is going to provide you that, not rockets. Its not like when enemy is within 100 meter of you in a mountain, you would ask for rockets on that position. Imprint this on your knowledge bank.
you don't need 150km range artillery guns to do such tasks.
short range artillery like mortars, field guns and howitzers will do the job. you better learn a thing or two about practical usage before asking others.

BTW, have you heard about MBPKS? Go and read about it. Its the new weapon system IA wants especially for mountain warfare.
i already know about it. you need not tell me.
that's just a shorter ranged and lighter guided rocket artillery with higher angles of projections. it doesn't matter how fancy the army baaboos name it. its esentially the same principle but with much shorter range, which also makes it lighter due to less oxidiser and fuel used in the rocket motor.
 

Aditya Ballal

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
733
Likes
2,655
Country flag

Who wants to see the epitome of PR?
Must be included in all Marketing and PR courses😂😂😂

Look at Saab’s PR and marketing vs HALs. No matter how good HAL products maybe no one will regard them to be superior or even equivalent over foreign maal any time in the future if they don’t get their act together.
My suggestion- They must first start out by inviting defence journos like Dr Ananthakrishna M or Shiv Aroo or Sandeep Unnithan , perhaps even the Delhi Defence review guy who did the Tejas Mk2 video to promote their products.
Post this they need to hire a competent PR firm to make professional videos like the Saab gripen one or even better.
This needs to be done especially if HAL ever dreams of legitimately exporting their products for cold hard cash rather than Government of India donations or credit lines.
 
Last edited:

mist_consecutive

Selling Wuhan Fried Bats
Contributor
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
1,347
Likes
9,316
Country flag

Who wants to see the epitome of PR?
Must be included in all Marketing and PR courses😂😂😂
Chill, give them so leeway. You are expecting PSU chai-biskut babus who need help from the intern to open their computers to run a PR campaign comparable to highly funded, market-researched and veteran company SAAB?

Look how the person is struggling to hold the camera still, we must applaud him for his physical dexterity of holding the camera still without any equipment by his arthritic hands.
 

omaebakabaka

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
2,434
Likes
5,820

Who wants to see the epitome of PR?
Must be included in all Marketing and PR courses😂😂😂
What are those idiotic flower pots there, 3rd class bastards with no sense of doing their job....even if video was stabilized...are those two pots suppose add to the beautification? Why are our people so fucking sloppy when it comes to presentation of anything? No one takes their job seriously....
 

omaebakabaka

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
2,434
Likes
5,820
Yes , it will slide till the back and cover the whole truck .
I would assume a much simpler setup like tarp over dump trucks which move mechanically is a cleaner design or a roller one but accordian is an interesting choice and off the top feels more complicated design choice, devil is in details though
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top