DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

mist_consecutive

Golgappe Expert
New Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
5,163
Likes
42,880
Country flag
Time to disband this money sucking shithole lab ADE.
I think its design flaw
Looks like not rustom 2 but ADE's performance till now is still shoddy
We should accept it that we can’t make drones, while even small countries like turkey can.
Why so much pessimism over a drone crash? Every weapon/platform goes through a testing phase where it fails multiple times and rectified so that it does not happen in operational times. Better to crash now rather than on the Pakistani border.

And drones generally have higher crash & failure rates overall, harder to control, low situational awareness, and communication issues.

But in general, I agree, DRDO is having unjustified difficulty over a technology that is being aced by private startups and even college kids.
We should look towards the private sector for making MALE UAVs and UCAVs.
 

Ayushraj

New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
2,404
Likes
19,518
Country flag
Why so much pessimism over a drone crash? Every weapon/platform goes through a testing phase where it fails multiple times and rectified so that it does not happen in operational times. Better to crash now rather than on the Pakistani border.

And drones generally have higher crash & failure rates overall, harder to control, low situational awareness, and communication issues.

But in general, I agree, DRDO is having unjustified difficulty over a technology that is being aced by private startups and even college kids.
We should look towards the private sector for making MALE UAVs and UCAVs.
Just like we bring in L $T for our nuclear submarine.
Sine barc and other psus were not able to complete arihant submarine and this caused delay.
But L$T did completed it in right way
 

FalconSlayers

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः
New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Messages
28,260
Likes
195,943
Country flag
Why so much pessimism over a drone crash? Every weapon/platform goes through a testing phase where it fails multiple times and rectified so that it does not happen in operational times. Better to crash now rather than on the Pakistani border.

And drones generally have higher crash & failure rates overall, harder to control, low situational awareness, and communication issues.

But in general, I agree, DRDO is having unjustified difficulty over a technology that is being aced by private startups and even college kids.
We should look towards the private sector for making MALE UAVs and UCAVs.
Lol how many we actually built? We are waiting for Rutoms in service for years, no induction till date and never will be.
 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag
So a drone crash justifies closing down ADE? How many private firms have capability to make a single weaponed drone even close to Rustom?

Developmental and operational phases have crashes and we are new to the field too.
Better merge it with ada , and work in partnership with newspace and new startup .

My fear us ghatak ucav is with ade , hope they don't fuck up royally , also nirbhay is a mess
 

Alfalfa

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2017
Messages
196
Likes
442
Country flag
Just like we bring in L $T for our nuclear submarine.
Sine barc and other psus were not able to complete arihant submarine and this caused delay.
But L$T did completed it in right way
What on earth are you on about? Can you list out the exact weapon systems and subsytems L&T "completed"... the level of disinformation people spread here with such confidence is shocking..

L&T had almost no role to play in the ATV program
 

Ayushraj

New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
2,404
Likes
19,518
Country flag
So a drone crash justifies closing down ADE? How many private firms have capability to make a single weaponed drone even close to Rustom?

Developmental and operational phases have crashes and we are new to the field too.
Closing of ADE will cause us more damage since experience and learning is also lost
But we should involve private sector in uav
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Better merge it with ada , and work in partnership with newspace and new startup .

My fear us ghatak ucav is with ade , hope they don't fuck up royally , also nirbhay is a mess
Why bullshittery every time? Does ADA has a magic wand solve all the problems? Even post a merger, both will continue operations as it is. Since ADA is a design agency, not a technology company.

Nirbhay needed a lot of stabilisers, actuators and turbofans + avionics no other missile would have, and I don't wish to utter bad words for keyboard warriors going gaga over here for drone crash.
 

Ayushraj

New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
2,404
Likes
19,518
Country flag
What on earth are you on about? Can you list out the exact weapon systems and subsytems L&T "completed"... the level of disinformation people spread here with such confidence is shocking..

L&T had almost no role to play in the ATV program
Arihant was delayed for years because of our psus.
So L$T was stepped in
And now after getting project in right direction because of L$T . Now L$T is kicked out of project
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
Closing of ADE will cause us more damage since experience and learning is also lost
But we should involve private sector in uav
Closing ADE means closing entire program (unlike our fanboys who believe that some magical agency will come with some different kind of technology and not rehold what ADE did).

Indeed we will, private sector is a decade away from doing what ADE can even with ADE's help. The string of mindless messages throughout page anyway is irritating.

ISRO, DRDO and ADA etc. aren't some exclusive bureaus who can do anything beyond their scopes. Their fields are different and they together are the representatives of Indian nationstate's technological capabilities. It's not like ISRO can do DRDO's job better. But it's like India has more success in space than defence industry. PSUs already communicate with each other if they actually have to source a technology from another.

ADE drone crahsed doesn't mean that LRDE will come to fix it.
 
Last edited:

Alfalfa

New Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2017
Messages
196
Likes
442
Country flag
Arihant was delayed for years because of our psus.
So L$T was stepped in
And now after getting project in right direction because of L$T . Now L$T is kicked out of project
Again, none of this is true... I personally know people who oversaw the program and know people who work for L&T Defense both at Powai and Hazira... Can you name the exact systems and subsystems they helped with? Any backing claim or link for the same? no you can't because there isnt any.... repeating the same lie a 100 times doesnt make it the truth
 

Ayushraj

New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2020
Messages
2,404
Likes
19,518
Country flag
Again, none of this is true... I personally know people who oversaw the program and know people who work for L&T Defense both at Powai and Hazira... Can you name the exact systems and subsystems they helped with? Any backing claim or link for the same? no you can't because there isnt any.... repeating the same lie a 100 times doesnt make it the truth
L$T integrated nuclear reactor into submarine and work our psus were not able to do
So project delayed for 7-8 years
 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag
Why bullshittery every time? Does ADA has a magic wand solve all the problems? Even post a merger, both will continue operations as it is. Since ADA is a design agency, not a technology company.

Nirbhay needed a lot of stabilisers, actuators and turbofans + avionics no other missile would have, and I don't wish to utter bad words for keyboard warriors going gaga over here for drone crash.
This is not just a out drone crash , they have done pretty hard work , but what they are doing is somewhat underperforming , yet are far ahead of private player but what harm would be giving specific workshare to some private partner , i am not in favour of shutting them rather use ada experience with aircraft designing to remove short comings in that part and better focus on other which they only have experience . Merger don't mean they will be assimilated fully but more interaction among the labs , what harm in it .

We used to criticize each and every drdo labs and then they proved them , but if ade can do it faster , then every possible effort should be made to make the product best suited for forces
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,416
Likes
56,946
Country flag
This is not just a out drone crash , they have done pretty hard work , but what they are doing is somewhat underperforming , yet are far ahead of private player but what harm would be giving specific workshare to some private partner
Harm is that private companies barely know anything on such technology. They are profit makers and not researchers and they will only take technology to produce for you. Government can sustained losses of many billions but a private firm won't survive a loss of even a few millions.

There are very few private companies in country will to take R&D. And till now, they only can make small UAVs. Our ecosystem isn't there yet.

Even at DRDO, things have matured with time and beared results, aircrafts, armaments, seekers, radars etc. all being produced within country. ISRO is dependent upon over 500 private factories, from spares to rocket engines. This is called creation of ecosystem. This takes time for any country who didn't even know how to make fertilizers after independence. Our critcism is of little value to any DRDO lab.

Jisme time lagna hai, lagega.
 

Articles

Top