- Joined
- Nov 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,742
- Likes
- 9,893
He said the cutout was there just to see the insides of the main weapons bay and unlike the main weapons bay do u see any side bay doors?Really ?
And what exactly was shown inside the side bays ?
Weapons and nothing else isnt it ?
So the guy who told you it was to show the inside of the wingman ( there is nothing to be seen or shown internally inside the wingman model except for the weapons , since it is the weapons bay ) was bullshitting you.
View attachment 76991
View attachment 76989
View attachment 76990
View attachment 76992
Also why does the model side cutouts have sawtooth edges ?
CATS WARRIOR is a stealth platform right ?
And any stealth platform will incorporate saw tooth edges on the openings and doors of its internal weapons bay to prevent detection by radars during opening and closing of its internal weapons bay doors during launch of its weapons.
Now explain this to your friend .
What's pains me is many here jumped on a wrong inference and did not even think logically for a moment to see the truth .
Sometimes one can make a mistake , but same mistakes by many is not correct . Don't outsource your brain to others amd don't believe everything blindly . All these whatsapp , twitter , facebook is destroying our independent thinking process.
It was a mockup... So ofcourse it was a hollow cavity.He said the cutout was there just to see the insides of the main weapons bay and unlike the main weapons bay do u see any side bay doors?
Now lets look at the position of the main weapons bay and side bays is the ucav even wide enough to have both and if look at the "side bays" close enough the mock up of saaw looks like its actually hanging down i have thought properly about the matter and then posted the info will ask around twitter to confirm or reject the info
So does these things tilt down to fire? How will this handle recoil in mid air, powerful motors and shock absorption systems?
Doubt it... Looks too light.So does these things tilt down to fire? How will they handles recoil in mid air, powerful motors and shock absorption systems?
Just assuming that they might not own a AK, how will they measure the recoil? Most of them just looks like done to get publicity for the startup, I am not saying that's wrong but still... Agree with you launching a grenade would be easier.Doubt it... Looks too light.
I wonder why nooone tried mounting grenade launchers instead. They'll pack more punch & be more managable.
Now that's how you win an argument
I'm probably seeing their Quad tube for the first time
Will be an improvement from the mono tubes howeverI'm probably seeing their Quad tube for the first time
But 97⁰?????
Seems a little low doesn't it
The tonbo one also gives the same specsWill be an improvement from the mono tubes however
If it can provide somewhat of vision to our almost night blind forces I think it will be okay.night vision's in their high no can really make porky army pee in the night because porks are so badly equiped in fighting in night.The tonbo one also gives the same specs
Can't say about the price though
Our game is behind when it comes to EO devices I think
Even GPNVG-18 also has a field of view of 97*.I'm probably seeing their Quad tube for the first time
But 97⁰?????
Seems a little low doesn't it
More than GPNVG-18I'm probably seeing their Quad tube for the first time
But 97⁰?????
Seems a little low doesn't it
Payload weight plays a major role. This is an utility drone rather then attack. So you need to carry out your primary role first.Doubt it... Looks too light.
I wonder why nooone tried mounting grenade launchers instead. They'll pack more punch & be more managable.