DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag

You can see the operator station to the left, a guy is controlling the RCWS from there
is there any RCWS domestic or foreign, where mounted weapon moves independent of optical sensors?
 

Okabe Rintarou

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
2,338
Likes
11,996
Country flag
is there any RCWS domestic or foreign, where mounted weapon moves independent of optical sensors?
What purpose would that even serve? Optics are used to target, gun is used to fire. They need to be pointing in same direction. If its only for observation purposes, no problem. The gun can swivel along with the optics. Its not like we are firing the thing. I don't see a reason to unnecessarily complicate RCWS design by incorporating two separate rotating joints. Then you will also get the additional problem of calibration.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
What purpose would that even serve? Optics are used to target, gun is used to fire. They need to be pointing in same direction. If its only for observation purposes, no problem. The gun can swivel along with the optics. Its not like we are firing the thing. I don't see a reason to unnecessarily complicate RCWS design by incorporating two separate rotating joints. Then you will also get the additional problem of calibration.
Hunter Killer in a anti-personnel role.
optical sensor continues to keep an eye on everything, mounted gun moves pointing towards the target identified.
 

Okabe Rintarou

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
2,338
Likes
11,996
Country flag
Hunter Killer in a anti-personnel role.
optical sensor continues to keep an eye on everything, mounted gun moves pointing towards the target identified.
Better to use a spray of bullets on clumps of personnel targets rather than apply hunter-killer concept of tanks. Otherwise you would need two sets of sensors. But its not a bad idea if the platform has enough power and space for two sets of sensors. It would increase field of view.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
Better to use a spray of bullets on clumps of personnel targets rather than apply hunter-killer concept of tanks. Otherwise you would need two sets of sensors. But its not a bad idea if the platform has enough power and space for two sets of sensors. It would increase field of view.
Thanks!!! I was worried if you would approve my idea or not. ;)
 

Emperor Kalki

New Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2019
Messages
290
Likes
697
Country flag
Hunter Killer in a anti-personnel role.
optical sensor continues to keep an eye on everything, mounted gun moves pointing towards the target identified.
That would work only for static targets....if the sensors pick a target, feed to the gun and look away to identify new targets, then what is giving feedback to the gun movement......it just keeps on firing in the same direction......so what if the target moves......isn't that logically correct 🤔
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
That would work only for static targets....if the sensors pick a target, feed to the gun and look away to identify new targets, then what is giving feedback to the gun movement......it just keeps on firing in the same direction......so what if the target moves......isn't that logically correct 🤔
optical sensors will be fixed, with a wide of range of view. mounted weapon can move independent of optical sensor. system need not be autonomous, target identification can be AI based ,target selection & FCS can be manned.

Operator's situational awareness need not restricted to the direction in which optical sensors are pointed towards.
 

srutayus

New Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
22
Likes
113
Country flag

OFB leaches have surfaced to abuse the army and dislike this interview by Maj. Gaurav Arya (Retd.) regarding the corporatization of OFB.

Looking at their attitude (read the comments) one wonders why this organization should be allowed to continue sucking money from Indian taxpayers, and make products that often kill our own soldiers.
 

no smoking

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,057
Likes
2,353
Country flag
There is no mention of it using a scramjet engine.
Its a waverider ie it rides on the hypersonic shocks created so its not a free falling glider. So 400 secs is hardly surprising. The record for scramjet is held by US at 200 secs.
Indeed, 400 secs for a scramjet engine aircraft was remarkable but not surprise. But if it is a glider as you suggest, with <15 Mach (more like <10 Mach) of initial speed, it is impossible.

Quote
"In the latest tests, the aircraft was able to maintain speeds greater than five-and-a-half times the speed of sound for 400 seconds at an altitude of 30km (19 miles). "

A glider without engine to support a 400 seconds flight with a sustained speed >5.5 mach at 30km altitude? This kind of glider technology doesn't exist on this planet.
 

Articles

Top