- Joined
- Aug 23, 2017
- Messages
- 5,706
- Likes
- 21,817
Tapas will be ready for user trial on September (earlier report)
Any news on that
Is our satlink ready
@NeXoft007
@porky_kicker
Any news on that
Is our satlink ready
@NeXoft007
@porky_kicker
Should u really put CAD models of weapons on online forums , looks like these are official CAD models
What about dare hbj pod for su30MKI to replace sap 518 pod from Russia.View attachment 37733
As far as I can tell it looks to be a new project , atleast to me.
Let's see...
Well KELTEC is now BATL and they do manufacture parts for BRAHMOS as well as other missiles too including ISRO launch vehicles.I believe the reasons will be clear once ( or if ) we get to see K4
Keltec specialises in naval applications don't they ? So it has to be either K15 or K4 . I think we can rule out K15, so that leaves K4.
And i don't think that is an inconvenient position for retro rockets.
You are being mislead by what I would call as ' geometrical optical illusion '
View attachment 37717
Sorry for the sloppy drawing but the general idea should be clear enough now regarding your questions wrt the position of the thrusters.
If i was working in drdo I would not be here passing my time posting here.Should u really put CAD models of weapons on online forums , looks like these are official CAD models
Do u work in DRDO ?cz when i was in HEMRL for BE project , we weren't allowed to disclose any CAD models
Possible.............................Well KELTEC is now BATL and they do manufacture parts for BRAHMOS as well as other missiles too including ISRO launch vehicles.
With the schematics you have provided, it looks fine for the output, but then again look at the inner side of the casing.
I would give you one more idea. Connect a couple of (4) butterfly valve on those inner placeholders which in turn would be connected to a closed chamber. Now you would get a system which would essentially control the flow of fuel or air in the chamber.
What's that for?
Electronic support measure ESM, part of electronic warfare.What's that for?
Sent from my Redmi 4 using Tapatalk
Incase anybody did not realise OBC= onboard computer. It is rated to survive extreme hypersonic conditions
UAV Satcom ?Tapas will be ready for user trial on September (earlier report)
Any news on that
Is our satlink ready
@NeXoft007
@porky_kicker
Got it ,naval buk variant "shtil", shivalik won't have barak 8 atleast for sometimeGuys needs some id on the missileView attachment 37752 on shivalik class
Just curious: How does FOG differ for 'under water applications' from say rocket/missile applications?
MLU at the very latest. Shtil, despite its flaws is good enough for the time being.Got it ,naval buk variant "shtil", shivalik won't have barak 8 atleast for sometime
No idea ,Just curious: How does FOG differ for 'under water applications' from say rocket/missile applications?
I once read there was talks going on to install the VLS version of shtil during MLUs.MLU at the very latest. Shtil, despite its flaws is good enough for the time being.
Plus, the P17s have a 32 cell Barak1 PDMS installed. So - chalega.
FOG is better then RLG in case of anti acceleration. So a torpedo equipped with FOG would be much more accurate along with being cheap in operation.Just curious: How does FOG differ for 'under water applications' from say rocket/missile applications?
I think it's the HBJ (high band jammer) by NAL. But the one in your pics has some sort of fins.