Smoothbore125mm
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2024
- Messages
- 888
- Likes
- 2,422
but can it launch a bhramos and do wheelis on moon
No screwdrivergiri
but can it launch a bhramos and do wheelis on moon
No screwdrivergiri
Naa they can delay it as much as they like but one of 3 systems will definitely come into servicebut can it launch a bhramos and do wheelis on moon
apart from jokes its really a competitive system and can carry/pull quite a lot of goods i think the pullling capasity was 1.5tons from what ive readNaa they can delay it as much as they like but one of 3 systems will definitely come into service
1.Ecars 4 wheel and 6 wheel ugv both are in user trails
2.Gridbots one Army has liked it especially with ATGM and we have seen them at one show with army already
3.Edgeforce(the one above in the pic) No idea if it has been in user trails thou.
That's hollywood tier nonsense tech. Regardless, such a vulnerability would never be allowed into service. Besides it's their engine, why would they damage it's reputation in the export market ?Just thinking.. is it possible for Uncle Sam to control Tejas engine via its large satellite networks with bugs built-in? The one crashed seems relatively new and sudden loss of thrust is scary for such a reliable engine.
i could argue with you for this but since 2 german sm2 failed to take down a mq9b im a bit skepticalJust thinking.. is it possible for Uncle Sam to control Tejas engine via its large satellite networks with bugs built-in? The one crashed seems relatively new and sudden loss of thrust is scary for such a reliable engine.
Why is it nonsense tech? Decades back US bugged Chinese president's boeing airplane! Now it is 2024. Its true that NSA has the most advanced ELINT sats in tbe world. Generations ahead of others.That's hollywood tier nonsense tech. Regardless, such a vulnerability would never be allowed into service. Besides it's their engine, why would they damage it's reputation in the export market ?
Thats Uncle Sam for you. They even bugged German chancellor's office forget SM-2. But Germany is a close ally of US. loli could argue with you for this but since 2 german sm2 failed to take down a mq9b im a bit skeptical
but the same happening with engines is highly unlikely
That either requires physical access to the thing you are trying to sabotage. Or have airborn assets in range for signals warfare. If a satellite could somehow interfere with engine management on an aircraft, that engine would not be selected for service. Tejas only syncs with Indian satellites to begin with using a secure handshake. To propose that the Indian Air Force accepted a technology that can be potentially remote operated for sabotage, is preposterous. Don't overestimate current battlefield electronic warfare tech, and don't ever think our engineers and planners are dumb idiots.Why is it nonsense tech? Decades back US bugged Chinese president's boeing airplane! Now it is 2024. Its true that NSA has the most advanced ELINT sats in tbe world. Generations ahead of others.
rather than bugging easier job would be to get a sevicing guy loosen up a screw or so easyThat's hollywood tier nonsense tech. Regardless, such a vulnerability would never be allowed into service. Besides it's their engine, why would they damage it's reputation in the export market ?
Edgeforce ? Whoever comes up with names like this for companies ? It's the reason BBC prompts snickering among Gen Z everytime a reporter goes on air to announce - I'm so & so reporting from so & so for BBC.
No screwdrivergiri
hope you havent heard about big bang boom defence companyEdgeforce ? Whoever comes up with names like this for companies ? It's the reason BBC prompts snickers among Gen Z everytime a reporter goes on air to announce - I'm so & so reporting from so & so for BBC.
I rest my case.hope you havent heard about big bang boom defence company
If Tejas can interact with satellites, why F404 can not with much more advanced satellites with larger antenna! You do not have any idea about current battlefield EW and its capabilities. So stop giving statements about something you do not hablve any idea.That either requires physical access to the thing you are trying to sabotage. Or have airborn assets in range for signals warfare. If a satellite could somehow interfere with engine management on an aircraft, that engine would not be selected for service. Tejas only syncs with Indian satellites to begin with using a secure handshake. To propose that the Indian Air Force accepted a technology that can be potentially remote operated for sabotage, is preposterous. Don't overestimate current battlefield electronic warfare tech, and don't ever think our engineers and planners are dumb idiots.
most of them are not but some of them are dumb for sure else why our Adhaar data is open andi chinese hands. why our bases and even conteol rooms have chinese cctv camera.don't ever think our engineers and planners are dumb idiots
So let me get this straight ? you believe the F404 engine inside the Tejas has it's own dedicated antenna/comm link that is capable of discreetly and independently communicating with any satellite and take commands via these satellites ? And this very convenient and not at all suspicious tech was missed by the minute inspection done by Indian specialists or somehow was allowed to stay in ?If Tejas can interact with satellites, why F404 can not with much more advanced satellites with larger antenna! You do not have any idea about current battlefield EW and its capabilities. So stop giving statements about something you do not hablve any idea.
I am always suspecious about any American weapons India is buying as all of them are prone to bugs.So let me get this straight ? you believe the F404 engine inside the Tejas has it's own dedicated antenna/comm link that is capable of discreetly and independently communicating with any satellite and take commands via these satellites ? And this very convenient and not at all suspicious tech was missed by the minute inspection done by Indian specialists or somehow was allowed to stay in ?
I'm going to say this to you politely without getting upset. Stop smoking whatever you are smoking.
Not exactly, common checklists can not be messed with. IAF Ground engineers can notice that. But the FADEC, control softwares and sensors are closed, directly from US and not shared with anyone else.rather than bugging easier job would be to get a sevicing guy loosen up a screw or so easy