NoobWannaLearn
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2022
- Messages
- 8,978
- Likes
- 29,244
Ok so kaveri is going on tejas or su 30mki? Or both
It was a proposal by the Air cmde
Ok so kaveri is going on tejas or su 30mki? Or both
But from 12 new su 30s 1 is for HAL only right to test stuff so that could be somethingIt was a proposal by the Air cmde
It looks like such a proposal is physically possible ..
Don't get your hopes up.
1 for HAL is probably for super Sukhoi upgrades .But from 12 new su 30s 1 is for HAL only right to test stuff so that could be something
Meant for testing and validation of Super Sukhoi upgrades.But from 12 new su 30s 1 is for HAL only right to test stuff so that could be something
None.
Ok so kaveri is going on tejas or su 30mki? Or both
Payload capacity of LVM3 to GTO is 4000 kg against the 4700 kg of GSAT-N2.And why do they need space x to launc, isro not launching?
Congratulations everyone
Drdo in 2023
Just want to say regarding defence development in India
Drdo in 2023
WOW
Drdo in 2023
If not full size testbed, MIG29 is THE perfect candidate. Anything else is a fool's paradise. Rd93 Engine's weight-dimensions match the Kaveri most .
Ok so kaveri is going on tejas or su 30mki? Or both
The problem is not Kaveri's size but the aircraft.If not full size testbed, MIG29 is THE perfect candidate. Anything else is a fool's paradise. Rd93 Engine's weight-dimensions match the Kaveri most .
Some of you are afraid that if something happens to Kaveri engine in mid flight, should we trust single engine RD93, meanwhile porkies have pretty safely managed to fly single engine Jf17 with same engine.
The proposal is to pod the kaveri and hang it from the wing . For testing purposes this is more ideal than placing the engine in place of the a main one .. taking out the engine and examining it is easier if it's exposed in the open like the underwing proposal.If not full size testbed, MIG29 is THE perfect candidate. Anything else is a fool's paradise. Rd93 Engine's weight-dimensions match the Kaveri most .
Some of you are afraid that if something happens to Kaveri engine in mid flight, should we trust single engine RD93, meanwhile porkies have pretty safely managed to fly single engine Jf17 with same engine.
@karnThe problem is not Kaveri's size but the aircraft.
Su-30s are perfect cause they can house the testing equipments due to their large size.
Air Cmdre idea was to house Kaveri in a pod much like how it's tested in Russia.
The proposal is to pod the kaveri and hang it from the wing . For testing purposes this is more ideal than placing the engine in place of the a main one .. taking out the engine and examining it is easier if it's exposed in the open like the underwing proposal.
Also adding monitoring equipment like @gyann mentioned above .
@Gyyan@karn
I've seen the video, he said Kaveri alone weighs ~1150kg + housing case(like it's fitted in illusin-76) = 1500 kg ,
it's way too much for wing pylon .
And about those testing equipments, why can't we place them In place of spinal tank, there is substantial space and power for everything .