DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Lonewarrior

New Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2019
Messages
3,572
Likes
12,154
Country flag
It's pronounced enough to get hit there
Yup, the gap between the turret and hull seems bigger than even some World War era tanks
Ah right .. turret ring is exposed .. But that would have to be a pretty lucky shot.
If the gap would have been lesser then it'd have to be a lucky shot...in this case it just need to be well aimed one
Isn't it the case that shot trap is only a problem with APHE rounds sabot rounds don't really bounce about like that.
We'll the actual problem with shot trap is not "shot trap" or turret ring but the thickness of hull's roof armour that's protecting the driver. Here's the armour layout of a T-72
Screenshot_2023-06-16-08-45-05-88_6bcd734b3b4b52977458a65c801426b0.jpg

The hull floor and roof armour are the thinnest at just 20mm, but the turret comes down in a flange to protect the front portion as much as possible.

So ultimately it won't matter what type of shell you're firing, that 20mm armour is vulnerable enough to be damaged by almost anything.
You fire a APFSDS, a single 30mm long sheared section of it would penetrate the hull like a hot knife in butter.
HE rounds would cause so much overpressure that the roof would crack.
Or as @SwordOfDarkness mentioned, even RPG would mess that thing up.
 

SwordOfDarkness

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
2,776
Likes
11,803
Country flag
So that thing is basically useless in a war maybe they will do something about it it's just a prototype right
2 issues I see

Their main prototype is 105 mm one, which cant handle MBTs
Turret design needs to be redone to be effective

The biggest thing is, neither will happen. Turkey isnt known for producing things that perform well in war; They are known for producing cool looking things with impressive spec sheets that will promote foreign sales. Tacticool>>>Practicool
 

NoobWannaLearn

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
8,978
Likes
29,244
Country flag
2 issues I see

Their main prototype is 105 mm one, which cant handle MBTs
Turret design needs to be redone to be effective

The biggest thing is, neither will happen. Turkey isnt known for producing things that perform well in war; They are known for producing cool looking things with impressive spec sheets that will promote foreign sales. Tacticool>>>Practicool
That's true seeing all there drones getting shot down in Ukraine is proof of that witch active air defence we have seen them go silent on drones front but atleast they are trying here we have no will to innovate
 

binayak95

New Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
2,526
Likes
8,790
Country flag
Arre ChaCha... 🤦‍♂️

Samyukta and Himshakti can't fly...now don't say you'll put one in C-130J and fly that

SAP-14/518 both are "jamming pod" instead of proper EW warfare platform like EA-18 or EC-130H. Jamming pods are good at protecting an attack package from enemy SAM and AAM by generating false targets...but that's all, it can't do anything other than that. Proper EW platforms can jam communications, radars, record radar positions on maps, even guide ARMs to them. And on top of everything, we don't have adequate number of even those jamming pods, only a handful.
The IAF has one squadron of dedicated SIGINT and ELINT aircraft, you know exactly which squadron I am talking about - and aside from that the best EW platform we have is the P8I - tells you all you need to know about the IAF's topsy turvy procurement.
 

binayak95

New Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
2,526
Likes
8,790
Country flag
15 for the Navy is overkill. Do they want to be omnipotent in every inch of the ocean around India or what?

IAF & IA seems to be getting a limited order only and will have to rely on indigenous options to fulfill larger requirement.
That is precisely why IN is buying 15. complete and total dominance of the information space in the IOR.

And to reduce the burden on the P8Is
 

binayak95

New Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
2,526
Likes
8,790
Country flag
2 issues I see

Their main prototype is 105 mm one, which cant handle MBTs
Turret design needs to be redone to be effective

The biggest thing is, neither will happen. Turkey isnt known for producing things that perform well in war; They are known for producing cool looking things with impressive spec sheets that will promote foreign sales. Tacticool>>>Practicool
the 105mm is not good enough for MBTs is a myth of epic proportions.

You show me one MBT that remains mission capable after taking a platoon of 4 105mm guns head on.

Mission kill doesnt mean K-kill.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
Posts related to predator acquisition moved, continue here.

 

johnj

New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
1,776
Likes
2,673
Is there is threads for EW, C4I2, ISTAR
1686921438905.png

Elbit Systems is unveiling the Nano SPEAR at The Paris Airshow, an advanced, digital and miniature system designed as a countermeasure against radar-guided air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles that threaten aircrews and their platforms. The Nano SPEAR is part of the Self Protection Electronic Attack and Reconnaissance (SPEAR) product family, which includes the Micro SPEAR for very small installations; Light SPEAR for installation on medium-large sized helicopters and UAVs; and the Advanced SPEAR ECM Pod currently on contract for providing active self-protection for the C-390 transport aircraft. The SPEAR product family is based on advanced hardware, including Digital Receiver Exciters, that are modular and provide ease of scalability.
The Nano SPEAR is an advanced, expendable RF decoy that uses the aircraft’s existing dispensing system, and once launched, acts independently to lure away hostile radar-guided missiles. Complementary to the aircraft’s existing EW System and operating in coordination with it, or standalone in the absence of an EW System, this ultra-smart RF decoy, weighing less than 800 grams, enhances the platform’s self-defenses and aircrew survivability, to achieve mission success. The Nano SPEAR features an advanced digital receiver, DRFM, and a sophisticated EW technique generator. This cutting-edge technology allows it to handle the most advanced radar threats. The Nano SPEAR is launched via a standard Counter Measure Dispenser System (CMDS) and provides effective RF protection to legacy and new platforms.
 

johnj

New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2021
Messages
1,776
Likes
2,673
Does anybody knows the kind of trajectory for prahar missile? It's based on AAD so any guess.

Afaik shourya follows a rather straight flight profile View attachment 210675

And if Pralay range is made out to be some 500km. Doesn't that mean in a purely ballistic profile, the range will be manyfolds??
Ballistic missile travel in ballistic trajectory. Shourya is not a true ballistic missile, its starts like ballistic missile, then fly like cruise missile and in thermal stage again ballistic.
prahar, pralay etc are TBM, ballistic missiles, follows ballistic trajectory
 

Articles

Top