- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
- Messages
- 5,163
- Likes
- 42,880
145 LCH serial production to start soon
But where is Helina ?
I think the Navy gets priority because of inter-operability with P8I & MH-60s. The Navy initially planned for 22 MQ-9s but settled for 15.Army and Air Force are getting 16 UAVs for a hostile land border of approximately 8,000km (Pakistan, Afghanistan, China, Nepal, Bhutan)
Navy is getting 15 UAVs for a maritime border of almost 7,500km
Well technically it's the Navy that need it the most. Mount a good SAR and you already have a very capable EO suit and start hunting for periscopes and pirates without any fear of SAM or AAMs. If they decide to add sonobuoys then we can put out P-8I fleet completely on standby, as Predator-B won't have issues like human fatigue or refueling.I think the Navy gets priority because of inter-operability with P8I & MH-60s. The Navy initially planned for 22 MQ-9s but settled for 15.
It's all superstition...we have a very professional military, we don't believe in myths like these.logistics nightmare
Again it's a self-protection jammer...not a dedicated EW attack platform. Moreover we still far far away from fleet integration of these
What kind of Rahul Gandhi logic is this? Navy needs to get it's eyes and ears till as far as the western indian ocean and south china sea. Army and IAF already has many Drones for border surveillance. This km comparison of your post make no sense. How much is the Indian ocean in sq.km?Army and Air Force are getting 16 UAVs for a hostile land border of approximately 8,000km (Pakistan, Afghanistan, China, Nepal, Bhutan)
Navy is getting 15 UAVs for a maritime border of almost 7,500km
Sometimes simpler parameters make more sense, trust me, it's coming from a guy who writes essays describing how things work.What kind of Rahul Gandhi logic is this? Navy needs to get it's eyes and ears till as far as the western indian ocean and south china sea. Army and IAF already has many Drones for border surveillance. This km comparison of your post make no sense. How much is the Indian ocean in sq.km?
So it's better you atleast read everything. No need to counter me by reiterating exactly what I've already saidWell technically it's the Navy that need it the most. Mount a good SAR and you already have a very capable EO suit and start hunting for periscopes and pirates without any fear of SAM or AAMs. If they decide to add sonobuoys then we can put out P-8I fleet completely on standby, as Predator-B won't have issues like human fatigue or refueling.
But in case of both Army and Air Force their needs can be fulfilled by smaller number of drones. Also they would be flying way closer to contested airspace.
Airforce? They were also the one who rejected Namca navy was keen on working on itThen by that logic shouldn't Army Aviation Corps have all the Apaches? They're one who would be calling for close air support, or will be doing combined arms warfare. Why lengthen the chain of command by including air force in it?
See, the problem here is we still don't have sensible commands in tri-services who think like a team. What we have are three young siblings who keep fighting for the treats their parents give. "If he's getting that, then I also need it".
Or even worse, sabotaging others procurement process. For example, Indian Navy has always wanted to maintain an aircraft carrier force of at least three, do you who has objected to this idea the most?
what is that, like seriously what is thatThese ice-cream seller are making me simp for a effing 60s Patton tank...and we still have not even though of substantially upgrading our T-72/90 fleet.
View attachment 210460
Granted it'll be very capital intensive, would require years...but atleast show some will, vision. Atleast announce a Make-II project for it
Roketsan's turret solution for M60 and T-72 too with new gun, better FCS, electromechanical drive, blowout panels, bustle autoloader...and every thing in a lighter package than original.what is that, like seriously what is that
That's a sexy turretThese ice-cream seller are making me simp for a effing 60s Patton tank...and we still have not even though of substantially upgrading our T-72/90 fleet.
View attachment 210460
Granted it'll be very capital intensive, would require years...but atleast show some will, vision. Atleast announce a Make-II project for it
Roketsan's turret solution for M60 and T-72 too with new gun, better FCS, electromechanical drive, blowout panels, bustle autoloader...and every thing in a lighter package than original.
That's a sexy turret
Ahem...ahem...5 tonnes lighter actuallyAlrighty Turkey your tank has a turret ring, we get it.
Looks heavy too.
Ahem...ahem...5 tonnes lighter actually
View attachment 210468
The only flaw I find in this system is that very graceful turret shot trap...otherwise the system looks perfect to upgrade old T-72s
I meant the M60's suspension was working hard.Ahem...ahem...5 tonnes lighter actually
View attachment 210468
The only flaw I find in this system is that very graceful turret shot trap...otherwise the system looks perfect to upgrade old T-72s
It's pronounced enough to get hit there.Isn't it the case that shot trap is only a problem with APHE rounds sabot rounds don't really bounce about like that.
Ah right .. turret ring is exposed .. But that would have to be a pretty lucky shot.It's pronounced enough to get hit there.
Not just sabo, RPGs etc would also get deflected toward the turret ring.Ah right .. turret ring is exposed .. But that would have to be a pretty lucky shot.
Badi badi baatien Vada Paav Khaate...145 lch for both army and iaf