- Joined
- Oct 9, 2021
- Messages
- 13,056
- Likes
- 35,001
I guess any user is a real userThere isn't any left except 1 or maybe 2 at max, I think. Most real users left the forum. Now only brochure experts left.
I guess any user is a real userThere isn't any left except 1 or maybe 2 at max, I think. Most real users left the forum. Now only brochure experts left.
Ukraine Russia war thread is the gem of DFI; on one end of the spectrum pro-Ukrainians mock how Russian weapons are outdated and on the other pro-Russians celebrate Ukrainian soldiers getting killed. More or less it's the patten there. Other than that you'd find occasional Ukraine is Nazi too.
And your point being?Don't kid yourself. You contributed to it too.
FYI... I am a real userI guess any user is a real user
The MFSTAR alone is good enough - problem is its power consumption and not enough cooling - we havent operated the MFSTAR at full power yet.Let's make it even more simple; why are we having two radars in the first place!?
US Arleigh Burkes had so many different types of radars ranging from surface search to illuminators, but when the moved to Zumwalt they replaced most of them with just a single AN/SPY-3 system.
Germans had a combination of SMART-L search and APAR targetting radar on their Sachsen class frigates. When the moved to Baden-Württemberg...simple, just a Cassidian TRS-3D system.
Same goes for Israel. Combination of EL/M-2228 and EL/M-2218 on Sa'ar 5. But in Sa'ar 6 it's just a single MF-STAR.
I think Godavari and Brahmaputra both were supposed to get STAR
Can't argue on this, a simple rotating thingy is always going to way easier to cool compared to a surface mounted AESA.The MFSTAR alone is good enough - problem is its power consumption and not enough cooling - we havent operated the MFSTAR at full power yet.
I don't think the redundancy is justified given the huge cost we incur on the second radar.And redundancy is a good thing to have. If the MFSTAR is prosecuting targets, the additional LANZA can be your early warning radar for other threats on the horizon (specifically talking about missile defense)
Agreed about TWS - but theres just not enough cooling right now to reliably allow the MFSTAR to do multiple tasks at the same time.Can't argue on this, a simple rotating thingy is always going to way easier to cool compared to a surface mounted AESA.
I don't think the redundancy is justified given the huge cost we incur on the second radar.
With modern AESA we can easily assign high powered pencil beams to individual targets while simultaneously using low powered sweeps to scan the environment (track while scan).
And just like we lost Denel and Rheinmetall...here goes Rolls Royce too
Say bie bie to amca engine deal from rr igAnd just like we lost Denel and Rheinmetall...here goes Rolls Royce too
It would not be affected.Say bie bie to amca engine deal from rr ig
Technically that's what it should happen, but it doesn't happen all the time. You can't predictIt would not be affected.
CBI has register the case against whom?Technically that's what it should happen, but it doesn't happen all the time. You can't predict
Denel was accused of and later blacklisted for bribery in their anti-material rifle submission, but because of this we lost the opportunity to have an indigenous SPH. Something even better than current K9s.
Similar is the case of Rheinmetall; imagine if we had not blacklisted them then currently we'd be having AHEAD on all our AK630s and BMPs
The second or third such incident with the Indian Apaches but no one commenting like against Dhruv, last month entire US fleet of Apache was grounded due to some issues and no one cared...On the positive side of today's emergency landing of Apache...
View attachment 207871
...even on routine sorties we carry Hellfire and Stingers.
Was it a crash?The second or third such incident with the Indian Apaches but no one commenting like against Dhruv, last month entire US fleet of Apache was grounded due to some issues and no one cared...
Half baked news. Its not just for Brahmos regiment, but involves the whole staff.Interesting, wonder if it is regarding experience sharing or such
Yeah but unlike the Dhruv, every one of the three incidents of the Apache has been precautionary landings. The Apache's self diagnosis suite gives ample warning, and redundant power and second , third, control systems allow for the helo to return and land.The second or third such incident with the Indian Apaches but no one commenting like against Dhruv, last month entire US fleet of Apache was grounded due to some issues and no one cared...
Was it a crash?
Does the Prachand have it?Yeah but unlike the Dhruv, every one of the three incidents of the Apache has been precautionary landings. The Apache's self diagnosis suite gives ample warning, and redundant power and second , third, control systems allow for the helo to return and land.
its part of the battle damage survival built into the Apache.
Unlike the Dhruv. which, fair enough, was never designed or required to have the same