TBH, I still don't find the logic behind the so called differences.Qrsam burns it's motor till end game , it's radar and command control is optimised to have higher sskp than range and operating quickly while on the move. Vlsrsam is being designed for vertical launch operation for large area defence ,plus range of vlsrsam is more than qrsam even though it's lighter owing to the fact that it don't have to be extremely maneuverable for the role of general purpose ad missile
Apko har case me problem haiEarlier I used to think that Akash-NG and QRSAM are redundant. But as some members pointed out about its range, QRSAM and VLSRSAM became redundant. And now after this 80km range of Akash-NG, the MRSAMs became redundant.
Typical Indian Fufa JeeApko har case me problem hai
Qrsam is launched at angle for faster response, i don't have details on vlsrsam radar ,then I can comment properly but both have definitely some differenceTBH, I still don't find the logic behind the so called differences.
QRSAM has a bigger warhead so it must be more lethal than VL-SRSAM but VL-SRSAM has a directional warhead so ultimately the end resuls become same.
And how're you going to optimize radar when two missiles have the exact same radar!? Yup, QRSAM uses the same 178mm Ku-band radar of Astra and VL-SRSAM. This is the sole reason why they had to taper down QRSAM's 225mm diameter body to fit that 178mm seeker.
View attachment 199811
Isn't the vlsrsam for the navy and qrsam for the army ? And vlsrsam has tvc vanes and the sr Sam does not ?Qrsam is launched at angle for faster response, i don't have details on vlsrsam radar ,then I can comment properly but both have definitely some difference
Vlsrsam for Air force is also being developedIsn't the vlsrsam for the navy and qrsam for the army ?
Actually the range of the missile is a lieLet me jump in
1. Akash with 25-30 km range ,is for airforce bases , other statistical important places , mostly in stationary condition, means missile will be placed there like pechora ....
2.aakash prime or akash s with 3okm+ range rumour, will have better capability due to an aesa seeker , but role remain s same , also there was news that akash prime will be good in mountainous region. Also 360 protection
3.qrsam is for army , basically to protect the moving infantry or armour s , range almost same as akash but akash is a heavy missile ,can cover higher altitude,but qrsam can fire in move .
4. Vlsrsam ,it's for navy , it's a vertical lunched missile , it will replace Barak 1 .range 15 km
5. Mrsam / lrsam ....mrsam called in iaf and ia as they will get higher range missile s , iaf already got s400
Lrsam called in navy ...
6.mpdms - it is for man portable operation , also vehicle mounted ones .range 6 km
So all missile s are different , they have different characteristics , different roles
Why mostly production partner understate the range ??
No ideaWhy mostly production partner understate the range ??
Yes, especially true incase of AAMsActually the range of the missile is a lie
No one tell you the actual Range it's +_ x% of the range that we get in brochures
1. Akash is for both IA & IAF, IN QRSAM project failed.Let me jump in
1. Akash with 25-30 km range ,is for airforce bases , other statistical important places , mostly in stationary condition, means missile will be placed there like pechora ....
2.aakash prime or akash s with 3okm+ range rumour, will have better capability due to an aesa seeker , but role remain s same , also there was news that akash prime will be good in mountainous region. Also 360 protection
3.qrsam is for army , basically to protect the moving infantry or armour s , range almost same as akash but akash is a heavy missile ,can cover higher altitude,but qrsam can fire in move .
4. Vlsrsam ,it's for navy , it's a vertical lunched missile , it will replace Barak 1 .range 15 km
5. Mrsam / lrsam ....mrsam called in iaf and ia as they will get higher range missile s , iaf already got s400
Lrsam called in navy ...
6.mpdms - it is for man portable operation , also vehicle mounted ones .range 6 km
So all missile s are different , they have different characteristics , different roles
FCR range always greater than max missile range.Muse on this if you want, FCR range almost 3 time the missile range given by bel poster lol
Surveillance radar range is generally 3 times or so missile range, maybe moreFCR range always greater than max missile range.
2m2 is only good for targeting fighter jets. helios.
FYI- akash max range 30km, its fcr range greater than 60km
Maybe BEL confused with akash s with ng or a new version with rocket motor.
May be new FCR comes with 150km range for 1m2[not sure]
Rf seeker1. Akash is for both IA & IAF, IN QRSAM project failed.
2. Akash prime or akash s is further improvement of Akash maily with seeker & improved electronics & c&c.
Who told you akash having aesa seeker ?
3. QRSAM for army, becz akash don't meet 3sec reaction time req.
4. VLSAM range greater than 20km, maybe upto 40km, it is similar to essm with lesser range.
5. Barak 8 with different names, range 70km. speed mach2.
QWho told you akash having aesa seeker ?
what is PSD??Yup, it was always bound to be a dual pulse motor. This is the only reason they ditched ramjet in this variant.
I just used "etc" in place of Akash-NG
We have mastered this dual pulse motor technology, it'll keep sowing in more and more designs
Pulse Separation Device.what is PSD??