Can it articulate for rough terrain or steep slope? If so, then that is very useful.
I think it's not even autonomous or even semi autonomousCan it articulate for rough terrain or steep slope? If so, then that is very useful.
If they don't refine it and keep it this shown configuration only, then it's the only thing it can do...Can it articulate for rough terrain or steep slope? If so, then that is very useful.
Right. If (big if) IA’s IBG efforts are implemented properly this won’t be the challenge that the Russians (and Ukrainians) are presenting it as. Combined arms warfare has been around for the best part of a century now but these sides have poorly (if at all) implemented it during this conflict.Loitering munitions are not some brahmastra. If we go down this rabbit hole there would be no need for any kind of large asset if the counter to everything is loitering munitions.
Besides the most effective use of UAVs has been real time fire correction by artillery guns.
Rehne dijiyeRedundancy Continues
After successfully kicking up a storm with the previous Akash-NG vs QRSAM debate...I'm back with another.
What're the things that QRSAM can do but VL-SRSAM can't?
What're are things that VL-SRSAM can do but QRSAM can't?
While going for procurement, the steps to be followed are pretty simple.@Chinmoy Can you explain the complete cycle of procurement in govt context - so that the confusion that pops up repeatedly on defence threads can be culled? I would then request @mods to make that post sticky in this sub forum - so that it can be referred - for any future confusion.
I believe this was explained by the designers some time backMaybe or maybe not that important according to mission, depending on AoA of heli during hover and cruise. What's more curious is that even bade bade aviation like Leonardo is making the same design choice for their new AW 249. Gunner EO is the above one
And if user really want he can insist on a blk2 variant with different placement of EO like these
View attachment 195423
View attachment 195424
Arre aise kaise...I'm eagerly waiting for a genius to convince me that one is launched vertically and other is launched quicklyRehne dijiye
Apne bohot pages bhada liya hai
Kya farak padta hai vl ho ya qr
Jo ana chahe aye
Not being technical but just blabbering
Kyu khoon zaya karte hain sahab, launch hoke to upar ki aour hi jayega na, bhale ab jahan bhi jaye wo bhagwan ki marzi haiArre aise kaise...I'm eagerly waiting for a genius to convince me that one is launched vertically and other is launched quickly
Thanks, so we still require is the CCS approval now. Lets hope we get that before Election.While going for procurement, the steps to be followed are pretty simple.
1st step is to create demand.
EOI, RFI, AON and RFP/RFQ are part of this step.
2nd is to create supply.
DAC, AON and CCS approval are part of this step.
In G to G deal, 1st step not needed?1st step is to create demand.
EOI, RFI, AON and RFP/RFQ are part of this step.
2nd is to create supply.
DAC, AON and CCS approval are part of this step.
There is a catch here. DAC has funding authority in themselves for which CCS approval is not required. But if you have foreign sub-components in the system, it goes for CCS approval.Thanks, so we still require is the CCS approval now. Lets hope we get that before Election.
In G2G, you still require RFI and RFQ.In G to G deal, 1st step not needed?
I guess one difference is that VLSRSAM has TVC while QRSAM doesnt. Range figures are also different.Arre aise kaise...I'm eagerly waiting for a genius to convince me that one is launched vertically and other is launched quickly
1st & 2nd step neee AON ?While going for procurement, the steps to be followed are pretty simple.
1st step is to create demand.
EOI, RFI, AON and RFP/RFQ are part of this step.
2nd is to create supply.
DAC, AON and CCS approval are part of this step.
Which thread should i go to cope about turks who have never made a manned operational jet have managed to roll out a 5th gen airframe before us?