Lonewarrior
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2019
- Messages
- 3,572
- Likes
- 12,154
It's called preemptive strikeThe specs have not been published by DRDO and you two are losing your shit over it LoL.
It's called preemptive strikeThe specs have not been published by DRDO and you two are losing your shit over it LoL.
Was there ever a tender out or they just bought it off the shelf?That is what I am saying.
Do we ? If you are referring to INSAS, then how can you benchmark a production unit against itself ? You need a third-party source of reference.I mean the reason to buy 40 new rifles...don't we have enough of 5.56x45mm with us?
So these 40 m4s are just for testing ammo?Do we ? If you are referring to INSAS, then how can you benchmark a production unit against itself ? You need a third-party source of reference.
Nowhere in the world actual guns are used for benchmarking of cartridges coz then you would be having way too many factors...short stroke guns will perform differently than delayed blowback one, same AR-15 from two manufacturers will perform differently. So ultimately it becomes more of a gun's benchmark test rather than a cartridge.Do we ? If you are referring to INSAS, then how can you benchmark a production unit against itself ? You need a third-party source of reference.
Good stuff, didn't knew about it !Nowhere in the world actual guns are used for benchmarking of cartridges coz then you would be having way too many factors...short stroke guns will perform differently than delayed blowback one, same AR-15 from two manufacturers will perform differently. So ultimately it becomes more of a gun's benchmark test rather than a cartridge.
So what all ammunition manufacturers and R&D personnel use all over the world is what's know as a "Mann gun or mann set-up". You've four parts, a target for terminal ballistics. A chronograph for velocity. A pressure probe for offcourse pressure. And perhaps the most interesting; an "universal receiver gun"...
View attachment 196794
...a single gun that can fire everything from .17 to 14.5mm.
You either (1) use this method to test ammunition or you (2) fire the ammunition form the gun you produced to check for the gun's benchmarks.
Never do you just wake up one morning and randomly select M16A4s from 50s of available rifles all over the world to use it as benchmark. It seems some local distributor has made a good fool out of them by selling surplus US M16s at 2.1lakh.
Over 2 lakh per M16 better be gold plated
OFB finally doing something for their quality control.
Just imagine the feeling we all here at DFI would have when we find out some dealer convinced them to pay $2.5k for thisOver 2 lakh per M16 better be gold plated
View attachment 196799
90,000-1.2 lakhs max for a decent rifle (with taxes). How did they come up with this pricetag. I doubt they are out buying gucci exotic crap.
Mast ghotala hua haiOver 2 lakh per M16 better be gold plated
View attachment 196799
90,000-1.2 lakhs max for a decent rifle (with taxes). How did they come up with this pricetag. I doubt they are out buying gucci exotic crap.
Does the VSHORADS require sustainer for such a short duration (15-20s)? The booster will take you till the end and you just have to control the direction.- Boost motor is sustainer motor for him
This is why they are using booster + sustainer arrangement in MANPADsDoes the VSHORADS require sustainer for such a short duration (15-20s)? The booster will take you till the end and you just have to control the direction.
Perhaps because of this sustainer type motor the max speed is slowest among all other MANPADsRemember a gentleman laughing at me on how can an ATGM be used as a SAM?
Guess what; our VSHORADs too is an ATGM.
Time and time ATGMs have shown their capability to engage low flying targets, perhaps the most famous being Stugnas downing Alligators in Ukraine. There also have been cases where ATGMs have been modified to act as MANPADs; the most interesting being that of Iranian Qaem-M where they added a proximity fuze to a TOW copy.
But as of now there have been no (obviously there maybe some that I'm unaware of) MANPAD to be developed from an ATGM.
Enters DRDO's VSHORADsView attachment 194875
- rear folding control fin; same as Nag/HELINA/Dhruvastra/SANT
- mid-body sustainer motor with four Venturi type nozzles; same as Nag
- mid-body folding stabilization fins; again same as Nag/HELI...
- warhead is obviously different; most probably a pre-fragmented type
- perhaps the most interesting feature that everyone's noticing is uncooled seeker. But no-one asked why this when every other MANPAD uses cartridge type cooled seeker. The answer is; NAG family also uses the same uncooled IIR seeker.
Can this testbed be used to replicated x round burst mode, auto etc?Nowhere in the world actual guns are used for benchmarking of cartridges coz then you would be having way too many factors...short stroke guns will perform differently than delayed blowback one, same AR-15 from two manufacturers will perform differently. So ultimately it becomes more of a gun's benchmark test rather than a cartridge.
So what all ammunition manufacturers and R&D personnel use all over the world is what's know as a "Mann gun or mann set-up". You've four parts, a target for terminal ballistics. A chronograph for velocity. A pressure probe for offcourse pressure. And perhaps the most interesting; an "universal receiver gun"...
View attachment 196794
...a single gun that can fire everything from .17 to 14.5mm.
You either (1) use this method to test ammunition or you (2) fire the ammunition form the gun you produced to check for the gun's benchmarks.
Never do you just wake up one morning and randomly select M16A4s from 50s of available rifles all over the world to use it as benchmark. It seems some local distributor has made a good fool out of them by selling surplus US M16s at 2.1lakh.
Those are parameters of a gun, not a round.Can this testbed be used to replicated x round burst mode, auto etc?
Agreed, but we do want to know how the performance is with different magazines/feeds with different settings don't we. For that, do we use a different testbed?Those are parameters of a gun, not a round.
You always find out the rate of fire or RPM of a gun not the rate of fire of a cartridge. An assault rifle will have RPM of 700 and for the same round a minigun will have 5000
Agreed; and in that case you need 10s of different types of guns, AR-15 have different feed lug than SCARs, BRENs have different feed lug than Galil. Now coming to magazine you need 10s of different types of STANAG magazines from different manufacturers, then you need wildcard ones like AK, Galil, Bren, G36.Agreed, but we do want to know how the performance is with different magazines/feeds with different settings don't we. For that, do we use a different testbed?
OFB need to redo all the Tooling, Machines, Lathes, Dies from scratch. They are using ages old machines which are no longer producing end product with the original specs due to Wear and Tear.
OFB finally doing something for their quality control.