AnantS
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2013
- Messages
- 5,890
- Likes
- 15,774
exactly I am not sure whats the need. Is this missile more compact compared to Prahar/Pranash?Kya iska matlab ab Prahaar aur Pralay ka LORA lagne waala hai?
exactly I am not sure whats the need. Is this missile more compact compared to Prahar/Pranash?Kya iska matlab ab Prahaar aur Pralay ka LORA lagne waala hai?
Nah, there's a valid concern when you know how IA operates, in 2023 and mass of your infantry guy looks like in the pic, that's a whole another level of utter shame.C'mon... this mentality that every other advanced work should not even start before everyone is at same level is BS thought process.
No one is spending all the money on this unproven stuff...
I think it stems from fear of failure that the guys trying these advanced stuff will cause some sort of cringe embarrassment to the others who are still manning the non upgraded units.
It's pretty much better in everythingexactly I am not sure whats the need. Is this missile more compact compared to Prahar/Pranash?
Pralay has marvIt's pretty much better in everything
View attachment 193551
Until and unless LORA is costlier than these two, it makes no sense in using those.
LORA is also quasi-ballisticPralay has marv
When was it purchased?The speciality of LORA missile is that it can be fired from a shipping container hence it is being purchased
Kuch nhi hoga LORA ka, jab order hi nhi milenge toh kahe ka LORA?Kya iska matlab ab Prahaar aur Pralay ka LORA lagne waala hai?
Surely, things might not be as clear to see from these specs, you can't be saying that LORA is superior to Iskander missile which is also 5 tons class. Ruskies are not that bad in missile tech.It's pretty much better in everything
View attachment 193551
Until and unless LORA is costlier than these two, it makes no sense in using those.
Why shouldn't weMore like jaguar replacement as hal marut was strike aircraft
Lca mk1 is mig 21 replacement
It solely depends on what is "superior" for you.Surely, things might not be as clear to see from these specs, you can't be saying that LORA is superior to Iskander missile which is also 5 tons class. Ruskies are not that bad in missile tech.
Because now the fetish have shifted to having a single platform that can do everything.Why shouldn't we
View attachment 193552
Why shouldn't we have a modern Jaguar-Frogfoot thingy that carries a fuckoff massive payload
View attachment 193554
View attachment 193553
Cheap, simple but elegant solution to bomb your opponent to ashes and then bomb the ashes again with current gen tech in radar and ordnance.
I would like to point out that there is no way the missile can reach 400Kms with a 550 kg warhead while having a total weight of 1.6 tons .. There is no propellant in existance that is that energetic. We are falling for the marketing of show the max range with the max payload.It's pretty much better in everything
View attachment 193551
Until and unless LORA is costlier than these two, it makes no sense in using those.
Because now the fetish have shifted to having a single platform that can do everything.
Why shouldn't we
View attachment 193552
Why shouldn't we have a modern Jaguar-Frogfoot thingy that carries a fuckoff massive payload
View attachment 193554
View attachment 193553
Cheap, simple but elegant solution to bomb your opponent to ashes and then bomb the ashes again with current gen tech in radar and ordnance.
I see that you have decided to come out as a "reformer".