DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

[NoobWannaLearn]

Looks like no other country wants amca to succeed

 

[DumbPilot]

Looks like no other country wants amca to succeed

We must be on the right track, then

 

[Abdus Salem killed]

Looks like no other country wants amca to succeed

Ask the Russians to give complete joint ownership of IP of radar radome
Most importantly engine
Then india can join let's see if these guys compromise

 

[Anandhu Krishna]

UN Generals can't buy imported mall due to to Pandemic and Ukraine -Russia war.!!!

In short, UN Generals can't even beg door to door for our own security during emergency. Imagine how dependent we have become?

Still UN Generals cry for shiny toys day in and day out like cry baby.

Sometimes, I even wonder whether our UN Generals possess pair of eyes or not?. Forget about being visionary, strategic thinker, military planner these qualities are simply impossible for them.

I think blindness is prime requirement to be a UN General.

QRSAM completed all Trials, Order soon: BEL CMD – Indian Defence Research Wing

idrw.org

Let's be honest. If a war breaks out we will still be using human wave tactics. Was the same in Kargil.

 

[Kuldeepm952]

Let's be honest. If a war breaks out we will still be using human wave tactics. Was the same in Kargil.

Gotta question where you are probably wrong on this?
But was it really human waves though, artillery was used aptly, even IAF did with what it has at time, basic infantry tactics of fire and maneuver were used.

So you gotta clear yourself bro what could have been done differently given that none army other than USA had high tech sh*t like predator drones and desert load of LGBs, not even China or Russia.

I doubt anything much could have been done there but now time is different and much can be done today, so is todays IA capable of using that advantage is the real question?

 

[Anandhu Krishna]

Gotta question where you are probably wrong on this?
But was it really human waves though, artillery was used aptly, even IAF did with what it has at time, basic infantry tactics of fire and maneuver were used.

So you gotta clear yourself bro what could have been done differently given that none army other than USA had high tech sh*t like predator drones and desert load of LGBs, not even China or Russia.

I doubt anything much could have been done there but now time is different and much can be done today, so is todays IA capable of using that advantage is the real question?

IAF didn't even know there were incursions at the beginning. even after understanding the situation army was hesitant to use airpower that much.

I doubt anything much could have been done there

Much could have been done like letting the AF take the lead once they realized the situation.

is todays IA capable of using that advantage is the real question?

Definitely the real question. Don't even have good expeditionary capability or well established offensive capability even after 75yrs of independence. IA logistics is incapable of supporting its combat arms after a short distance from the border.

 

[jai jaganath]

Gotta question where you are probably wrong on this?
But was it really human waves though, artillery was used aptly, even IAF did with what it has at time, basic infantry tactics of fire and maneuver were used.

So you gotta clear yourself bro what could have been done differently given that none army other than USA had high tech sh*t like predator drones and desert load of LGBs, not even China or Russia.

I doubt anything much could have been done there but now time is different and much can be done today, so is todays IA capable of using that advantage is the real question?

I have question if such situation occurs today then what will be our reaction type
I believe it won't be much different from what we did in 1999

 

[Lonewarrior]

I have question if such situation occurs today then what will be our reaction type
I believe it won't be much different from what we did in 1999

1. Deny 2. Procrastinate 3. Deny 4. Blame opposition/LW/US
5. Reconnaissance
6. Precision bombing
7. SF operations

 

[DumbPilot]

1. Deny 2. Procrastinate 3. Deny 4. Blame opposition/LW/US
5. Reconnaissance
6. Precision bombing
7. SF operations

Why aren't we moving direct to stage 5?

 

[Lonewarrior]

Why aren't we moving direct to stage 5?

Because in India we have more [first half of your own name] than [second half of your own name]

 

[NoobWannaLearn]

We must be on the right track, then

Yes waiting for updates from aero India and really want to know what's with tedbf getting updated to 5th gen is roumor or what

 

[Gyyan]

Yes waiting for updates from aero India and really want to know what's with tedbf getting updated to 5th gen is roumor or what

Also the copium that mk2 may roll out at the end of 23.

 

[samsaptaka]

STOP DHOTI SHIVERING!!!

What's with the anti hindu phrase ? Pls use pyjama shivering and don't insult our national dress bro

 

[Kuldeepm952]

IAF didn't even know there were incursions at the beginning. even after understanding the situation army was hesitant to use airpower that much.



Much could have been done like letting the AF take the lead once they realized the situation.



Definitely the real question. Don't even have good expeditionary capability or well established offensive capability even after 75yrs of independence. IA logistics is incapable of supporting its combat arms after a short distance from the border.

Lol, even the current IAF is not aptly prepared for ground support just like the current RuAF. We have very little amount of standoff weapons for ground support, in our case just the few LGBs imported ones.

Even if you see the nomenclature and case use of new standoff weapons being developed such as rudram, LRGB, and saaw. All are for use against airfield targets and radars.

IAF is still in its mindset of its role as just to protect skies and well nothing of a thought is given to expand its role as ground support enhancement force. This is one place where we could have tried to copy from West.
Anyway do we even have JTACS integrated within our army on a uniform basis like USA, obviously not talking about Garuda and few Paras trained in it.

 

[ezsasa]

Lol, even the current IAF is not aptly prepared for ground support just like the current RuAF. We have very little amount of standoff weapons for ground support, in our case just the few LGBs imported ones.

Even if you see the nomenclature and case use of new standoff weapons being developed such as rudram, LRGB, and saaw. All are for use against airfield targets and radars.

IAF is still in its mindset of its role as just to protect skies and well nothing of a thought is given to expand its role as ground support enhancement force. This is one place where we could have tried to copy from West.
Anyway do we even have JTACS integrated within our army on a uniform basis like USA, obviously not talking about Garuda and few Paras trained in it.

for IAF to adopt U.S like CAS doctrine, India will need it's own engine and aircraft. in U,S doctrine of CAS, limited number of birds stay up in the air at any point during the day and night irrespective of whether there is mission planned or not, at the time of take off. if and when ground support is needed, they get mission co-ordinates and objectives while in air. this is why during afghan war, ground troops could call up CAS to take out even a diskha in minutes sometimes, but not all CAS requests are approved all the time by mission command.

a version of JTACS is available with IAF in 1971 war itself, IAF officers were on ground in dacca co-ordinating strikes in the last days of fall of dhaka. just a wireless set, not much. donno if it was a relay or direct comm. with mig-21s. remember seeing it in one of those 1971 documentaries.

 

[binayak95]

for IAF to adopt U.S like CAS doctrine, India will need it's own engine and aircraft. in U,S doctrine of CAS, limited number of birds stay up in the air at any point during the day and night irrespective of whether there is mission planned or not, at the time of take off. if and when ground support is needed, they get mission co-ordinates and objectives while in air. this is why during afghan war, ground troops could call up CAS to take out even a diskha in minutes sometimes, but not all CAS requests are approved all the time by mission command.

a version of JTACS is available with IAF in 1971 war itself, IAF officers were on ground in dacca co-ordinating strikes in the last days of fall of dhaka. just a wireless set, not much. donno if it was a relay or direct comm. with mig-21s. remember seeing it in one of those 1971 documentaries.

Relay. Even today (thanks to the IA's apathetic Signals equipment) IAF and IA do not talk to each other. While IN and IAF can.

Some mechanized divisions however have adopted SDRs and can talk directly to Apaches, Rudras and LCH that are in the area.

We do not have the will (or the brains in case of the IA) to pull off true jointness.

 

[WarmongerLSK]

Spoiler: backup

 

[SavageKing456]

 

[Lonewolf]

View attachment 192855

What we are looking at

 

[NotASussyBoi]

Spoiler: backup

View attachment 192839

Any advantages for a tailess aircraft aside from stealth?