DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Kuldeepm952

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
947
Likes
4,969
Country flag
FkbCWTuacAAlj2i.jpeg


So, the thing happened which I feared.
I think we should just hold a funeral for ATAGS at this point. Probably Bharat-52 can fill that role. But for god's sake why push that extra weight line crap in rfi when IA fully know the weight of ATAGS.
Apparently, a truck tank carrier can pull 50+ton k9 vajra right upto LAC but will fall flat if weight of howitzer gets increased from 15 to 18 tons 🤷‍♂️??
What type of mobility these guys require exactly.

Where are the people from IA who jointly gave specifications for ATAGS to DRDO? Time to axe them.
 

kharabela

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2022
Messages
186
Likes
990
View attachment 186687

So, the thing happened which I feared.
I think we should just hold a funeral for ATAGS at this point. Probably Bharat-52 can fill that role. But for god's sake why push that extra weight line crap in rfi when IA fully know the weight of ATAGS.
Apparently, a truck tank carrier can pull 50+ton k9 vajra right upto LAC but will fall flat if weight of howitzer gets increased from 15 to 18 tons 🤷‍♂️??
What type of mobility these guys require exactly.

Where are the people from IA who jointly gave specifications for ATAGS to DRDO? Time to axe them.
Was there a weight reduction in ATAGS ? Have seen few twitter people claiming its 15/16 tons now . Also its says preferably . Not must be . May be 2 tons for extra 5/7 km range ll be adjusted .
 
Last edited:

Kuldeepm952

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
947
Likes
4,969
Country flag
Was there a weight reduction in ATAGS ? Have seen few twitter people claiming its 15/16 tons now . Also its says preferably . Not must be . May be 2 tons for extra 5/7 km range ll be adjusted .
Nah, that was just a talk in air that by using titanium at various places in ATAGS weight can be reduced but that would drive up the cost.

The funny thing is ATAGS cleared all trials with its original weight with little to no problems including mobility trials and yet IA floats a RFI for artillery gun with less weight for mobility purpose.

IA to logic
1671542859465.png

 

Kuldeepm952

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2019
Messages
947
Likes
4,969
Country flag
To older members as I understand RFI is basically asking for specs of products the companies have following which a RFP is formulated and as I believe requirements of RFP can be different from RFI?? But in this case a probable clause that a less than 15 ton article is preferred?
So any chance for ATAGS or
1671543150914.png
 

Chinmoy

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,930
Likes
23,094
Country flag
View attachment 186687

So, the thing happened which I feared.
I think we should just hold a funeral for ATAGS at this point. Probably Bharat-52 can fill that role. But for god's sake why push that extra weight line crap in rfi when IA fully know the weight of ATAGS.
Apparently, a truck tank carrier can pull 50+ton k9 vajra right upto LAC but will fall flat if weight of howitzer gets increased from 15 to 18 tons 🤷‍♂️??
What type of mobility these guys require exactly.

Where are the people from IA who jointly gave specifications for ATAGS to DRDO? Time to axe them.
And where is our Raj Kapoor "Baba Kalyani" who famously said that they could bring down the weight of ATAGS to 16 ton?

Moreover, its a RFI or IA is just asking for Information on any current system available. Based on its response, RFP would be released in February 2023. So this weight part has been accompanied with 'PREFERABLY'.
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,185

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,185
And where is our Raj Kapoor "Baba Kalyani" who famously said that they could bring down the weight of ATAGS to 16 ton?
I think he implied in an interview to CNBC18 that they need orders to implement any further improvement.
His words more or less "We can further improve the weight by using titanium alloys later"
 

mist_consecutive

Golgappe Expert
New Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
5,163
Likes
42,880
Country flag

Seems like MQ-9 order is finalized, and we apparently negotiated a ToT aswell. 60% order will be locally assembled in India while the rest will be in fly-away condition delivered.
 

kharabela

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2022
Messages
186
Likes
990
I thought that it would be easier to ask someone here than Google. Thank for your reply mate.

Anyways, I've found it
Their 45 caliber had received order of 114 guns 3/4 years back . But faced production quality issue . Delivery has not been completed as far as i know . 52 caliber is newly introduced . And might go through all kinds of testing .
 

another_armchair

New Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
12,096
Likes
54,387
Country flag
Their 45 caliber had received order of 114 guns 3/4 years back . But faced production quality issue . Delivery has not been completed as far as i know . 52 caliber is newly introduced . And might go through all kinds of testing .
Doubt there were quality issues. Covid and lockdowns had wrecked the production cycle(some parts still being imported I guess).



One regiment of the indigenous Dhanush artillery systems, developed based on the Swedish Bofors guns, has been inducted and operationalised in high altitude area along the Northern Borders after extensive validation. By March 2023, the Army should receive 18 guns to form the second Dhanush regiment, the source said.
On the Sharang guns, the up-gunned 130mm artillery guns to 155mm, 45 calibre guns, three regiments have been operationalised so far with the 4th regiment in process. The order for up-gunning 300 guns is being executed by three difference DPSUs carved from the erstwhile Ordnance Factory Board.

“Three Sharang regiments are expected to be delivered per year and 15 artillery regiments are to be equipped with Sharang. So, it should be done in five years,” the source explained. The Army received the first Sharang gun in February 2020 and the entire process of acquiring these guns is expected to be completed in four years of time.
 

kharabela

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2022
Messages
186
Likes
990
Doubt there were quality issues. Covid and lockdowns had wrecked the production cycle(some parts still being imported I guess).


The Ordnance Factory Board received a bulk production clearance from the army and the Defence Ministry for production of 114 Dhanush guns in 2019. However, by June 2021, only 12 of these guns had been delivered to the army, not enough even for the first regiment of 18 guns. In 2017, the Central Bureau of Investigation found that cheap Chinese parts passed off as 'Made in Germany' had been used in the gun.
production quality issue thing is from a print article

The Army had, in 2018, placed an initial order for 114 of the 155mm x 45mm Dhanush, manufactured by the Ordnance Factory Board’s Gun Carriage Factory (GCF) in Madhya Pradesh’s Jabalpur — now known as Advanced Weapons and Equipment India (AWE) Limited. However, the delivery was hit by production quality issues flagged by the force and hence needed fresh firing trials before being deployed fully.
 

Articles

Top