DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Aditya Ballal

New Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2020
Messages
3,616
Likes
22,281
Country flag
Sarkaari vs private. Our PSU's really suck at marketing.
Almost none of our Private firms have a great website, most have mediocre one’s, awfully bad one’s with absolutely no relevant information regarding their products and most times absolutely nothing. There are very few who have a decent and functioning website.
A good number of them don’t even have decent SM pages at all. They only wake up during expos and festivals.
 

ShukantC

New Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Messages
117
Likes
755
Country flag
So according to Alpha Defense the new DRDO MALE/HALE UAV are actually license produce IAI Eitan, Can anybody confirm???

Honestly I don't think its the worst option, if they take the airframe of the Eitan and include all the sensors developed for the Rustom UAV. That way both the systems will have commonality and thereby easier logistics.
This way our immediate requirement for a MALE/HALE UAV with an armed version can be met at a much faster pace. While at the same time ADE and DRDO work on a HALE turbofan powered UAV on the lines of the General Atomics Avenger.


162bb18e30925fcfaef3319e153d9cfe.jpg
 

NoobWannaLearn

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
8,978
Likes
29,244
Country flag
So according to Alpha Defense the new DRDO MALE/HALE UAV are actually license produce IAI Eitan, Can anybody confirm???

Honestly I don't think its the worst option, if they take the airframe of the Eitan and include all the sensors developed for the Rustom UAV. That way both the systems will have commonality and thereby easier logistics.
This way our immediate requirement for a MALE/HALE UAV with an armed version can be met at a much faster pace. While at the same time ADE and DRDO work on a HALE turbofan powered UAV on the lines of the General Atomics Avenger.


View attachment 178477
Ok that uav looks sexy af
 

omaebakabaka

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
4,945
Likes
13,835
Almost none of our Private firms have a great website, most have mediocre one’s, awfully bad one’s with absolutely no relevant information regarding their products and most times absolutely nothing. There are very few who have a decent and functioning website.
A good number of them don’t even have decent SM pages at all. They only wake up during expos and festivals.
These sort of companies do not do business via websites and generally do not make it a point to maintian them. Look at Japanese companies, same way....barely usable. I actually like it that way sometimes, b2c is not the priority. No one buys high ticket items via shopping cart or even distribute info through websites. Its old school with brokers and so on which we know already.
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,245
Likes
7,531
Country flag
CIWS type systems are too bulky and sends massive amount of ammo to hit one target, and then there is line of sight restriction in a gun(even radar RF travels in a straight line) and the parabolic curve of the ammo round.

View attachment 175279

missiles on the other hand, can operate beyond line of sight. if we add loitering munitions to the mix, even more flexibility in the hands of the CO.
Gun C-RAM are the only viable defence against Paki Rangers indiscriminately targeting Indian border villages.





 

omaebakabaka

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
4,945
Likes
13,835
Wouldn't L&T sudarshan with programmable ammo be good provided that targeting radar is able to provide fire control against CRAM threats.
Defensive strategy is for losers, AD at any level should be to protect assets that are required to fight war or protect a vital installation like dams, critical bridges and other nodes. Protecting villages and people should not be priority and frankly if they indiscriminately target a village on our side especially kashmir then we should target 4 on their side. This is the only deterrent that may work to some degree....
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,245
Likes
7,531
Country flag
Wouldn't L&T sudarshan with programmable ammo be good provided that targeting radar is able to provide fire control against CRAM threats.
If it can, that's awesome. It needs to demonstrate its C-RAM capability. So far it has only demonstrated AD role AFAIK.
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,245
Likes
7,531
Country flag
HAIN?

Any ammunition above 40mm needs to take into account your ready load. You cannot carry more than a few score ammo AT best - and given how every turret is not unmanned, best of luck keeping your gun ready for use.

And just chuck Russia out the window - junk fantasy dreams built by idiots high on vodka.
The CV90 series of ICVs have many options, ranging from 20mm to 105mm light tank, but the most prevalent is 35mm - which is chain fed by a linkless system (dual feed), has smart fusing and APDS available and is quite decent.

All 40mm guns are still hand fed in stripper clips of 5 rounds (or is it 4) - but given just how fast you can load stripper clips, its not too big a hassle.

Anything above 40mm and you have problems with feeding the gun (and RELOADING the entire belt feed once youre done - not easy at all)

The Stryker Dragoon is 30mm, so is the Boxer. Which ICV has 50mm ?
Bradley Replacement uses 50mm

T-15 Armata heavy IFV will now use 57mm Au-220m Kinzhal turret.
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
New Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,245
Likes
7,531
Country flag
Nothing new. Proximity Fuzing 40mm Bofors have been a thing since WWII (really) and you are right about a single barrel not being enough. In a saturation attack that barrel will overheat and melt.

View attachment 175366

This is from WWII. Bofors L60 USN mount.
View attachment 175368

and this is the British QF 2 pounder 40mm in an EIGHT gun mount.

Remember even these were not enough. USN cruisers and destroyers would have many quad and double 40mm mounts, all around the ship, supported by Oerlikon 20mm guns in similar numbers. EVEN then kamakaze attacks got through and knocked out capital ships. CAPITAL ships, defended by many other ships, and long range DP 5inch guns.


So, yeah - one measly 40mm gun aided by modern FCR aint gonna cut it.

I dont know why know one has brough back these behemoths - with modern electronics they will be terror on the battlefield.
Remembered this old photo

FB_IMG_1666633440205.jpg
 

The Shrike

New Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2021
Messages
2,437
Likes
9,383
Country flag
So according to Alpha Defense the new DRDO MALE/HALE UAV are actually license produce IAI Eitan, Can anybody confirm???

Honestly I don't think its the worst option, if they take the airframe of the Eitan and include all the sensors developed for the Rustom UAV. That way both the systems will have commonality and thereby easier logistics.
This way our immediate requirement for a MALE/HALE UAV with an armed version can be met at a much faster pace. While at the same time ADE and DRDO work on a HALE turbofan powered UAV on the lines of the General Atomics Avenger.


View attachment 178477
That model was displayed in the HAL section, and not DRDO correct? They had signed a deal with IAI to push screwdrivergiri of drones in India. IMO the DRDO is probably on its own track.
 

NoobWannaLearn

New Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2022
Messages
8,978
Likes
29,244
Country flag
That model was displayed in the HAL section, and not DRDO correct? They had signed a deal with IAI to push screwdrivergiri of drones in India. IMO the DRDO is probably on its own track.
Yes on hal section with no info drdo is just doing its own thing I guess
 

SwordOfDarkness

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
2,776
Likes
11,803
Country flag
Wouldn't L&T sudarshan with programmable ammo be good provided that targeting radar is able to provide fire control against CRAM threats.
Not sure if firing speed is fast enough for things like mortars, or cost effective enough. Mortars are cheap af, IDK what the cost ratio between 8 programmable rounds to one mortar is (assuming 2 bursts to shoot it down) but I think it wont be in our favour. CRAM seems better.
 

SwordOfDarkness

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
2,776
Likes
11,803
Country flag
So according to Alpha Defense the new DRDO MALE/HALE UAV are actually license produce IAI Eitan, Can anybody confirm???

Honestly I don't think its the worst option, if they take the airframe of the Eitan and include all the sensors developed for the Rustom UAV. That way both the systems will have commonality and thereby easier logistics.
This way our immediate requirement for a MALE/HALE UAV with an armed version can be met at a much faster pace. While at the same time ADE and DRDO work on a HALE turbofan powered UAV on the lines of the General Atomics Avenger.


View attachment 178477
Uhhh... Thats not eitan :/

This is eitan, better known as Heron TP

1666639940697.png
 

Articles

Top