- Joined
- Oct 9, 2021
- Messages
- 13,056
- Likes
- 35,001
Kransopol is licensed produced ?
Why buy Excalibur then
Kransopol is licensed produced ?
It's just as u said for Carl Gustav, however I had a pic where it shows the cardboard a bit, lost it since I changed phone very recently ( from keypad to touch). But 100% that we have been using kranspol m2You sure about Krasnopol???
Carl Gustav ammunition HEAT 551, HEDP (seen in field with IA) although not mentioned in their online catalogue, we have seen thier pics made by ofb in several expo, same for cargo ammunition for artillery (If you search ofb Twitter pics of last 3 months, you'll see a pic in which there is mention of these munitions) but never seen with IA, no photo evidence. Now IA order these ammunitions or not, atleast there is no evidence either pictorial or verbal (from someone who has seen or used themselves).
Coming to KRASNOPOL, atleast no pictoral or official verbal mention that ofb manufacture these. Also never seen a KRASNOPOL in service with IA.
Bhai by licencing, I believe only warhead section. Ruskies wouldn't have given TOT for sensorsKransopol is licensed produced ?
Why buy Excalibur then
Atleast we can make these now .Bhai by licencing, I believe only warhead section. Ruskies wouldn't have given TOT for sensors
1. Excalibur is is GPS and INS guided, whereas Kranspol is laser guided. It isn't compatible with fh 77 i.e, Bofors
A single Excalibur shell seems to cost >$100k and Kranspol around $35k. Me believe both are screwing us
2. From my assessment, we still haven't had a breakthrough in sensor-fused weapons (PGMs).
It's after these many years we r testing precision guided ammunition and will take a year or so for operationalising it
View attachment 115895
DRDO has initiated work on add on guidance kits for regular shells, which are cheap
So logically, the next step should be complete system like Excalibur
Is this guiDedBhai by licencing, I believe only warhead section. Ruskies wouldn't have given TOT for sensors
1. Excalibur is is GPS and INS guided, whereas Kranspol is laser guided. It isn't compatible with fh 77 i.e, Bofors
A single Excalibur shell seems to cost >$100k and Kranspol around $35k. Me believe both are screwing us
2. From my assessment, we still haven't had a breakthrough in sensor-fused weapons (PGMs).
It's after these many years we r testing precision guided ammunition and will take a year or so for operationalising it
View attachment 115895
DRDO has initiated work on add on guidance kits for regular shells, which are cheap
So logically, the next step should be complete system like Excalibur
No it is not , it is not a HPM systemIndian DRDO experimental HPM ( high power microwave ) systems,it can generate 500 MW of RF power in S-band.
View attachment 115875
Then what is it Bhai???No it is not , it is not a HPM system
if there is any spinoff of kalil, you will never knowThen what is it Bhai???
Are there any spin-off from KALI project???
Sedif there is any spinoff of kalil, you will never know
Yup, on page of ATAGS, drdo site, there's a mention of a long range guided munition, though currently in development or not is a question.Bhai by licencing, I believe only warhead section. Ruskies wouldn't have given TOT for sensors
1. Excalibur is is GPS and INS guided, whereas Kranspol is laser guided. It isn't compatible with fh 77 i.e, Bofors
A single Excalibur shell seems to cost >$100k and Kranspol around $35k. Me believe both are screwing us
2. From my assessment, we still haven't had a breakthrough in sensor-fused weapons (PGMs).
It's after these many years we r testing precision guided ammunition and will take a year or so for operationalising it
View attachment 115895
DRDO has initiated work on add on guidance kits for regular shells, which are cheap
So logically, the next step should be complete system like Excalibur
I already mentioned it previouslyThen what is it Bhai???
Are there any spin-off from KALI project???
It can mimic rcs of number of jets, so use ur imagination.It it possible to make this target drone a loitering munition? It will be a nice toy to destroy the S400 batteries in Tibet if that happens, we have Israeli Harpy and Sky striker already, having an indigenous option nice way to grow the arsenal as we need more munitions like this.
Will need significant redesign to include front head sensor(TV/IIR), space for warhead, change of aerostructure for canister launch capability, addition of dedicated small booster for ground launch, further aerodynamic enhancements for loitering optimization, a robust datalink and a higher thrust engine due to changes all above as it's original weight in current config is just 70kg.It it possible to make this target drone a loitering munition? It will be a nice toy to destroy the S400 batteries in Tibet if that happens, we have Israeli Harpy and Sky striker already, having an indigenous option nice way to grow the arsenal as we need more munitions like this.
"Indian Woodpecker"
so rustom 1's official name is archer
So archer is basically WSI version of Rustom 1 with i guess some other improvements probably INS navigation etc. ?
Dat hindi though , wow
So which mizzile it will carry ?? Helina ?? Druvastra ??