DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

THESIS THORON

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
1,445
Likes
6,668
Country flag
dedicated ew fighter jet is nice, but why dont we make a emp missile for SAM.

imo it will be more effective than anti radiation missile, bec antiradiation missile will need to destroy the radar
but if emp missile will burst near 1km radius it will just fry the electronics

opinions plz :ear::ear:
 

porky_kicker

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2016
Messages
5,624
Likes
40,375
Country flag
Its kind of embarrassing to post ones own tweets :sad:

It looks like the members here are boycotting my tweets :tongue2:

Well dont know what to say other than sharmao mat

Would prefer posting here but thing is life is convoluted and a mess since some time , once its sorted will be here as i was previously
 

Abdus Salem killed

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
2,183
Likes
8,650
Its kind of embarrassing to post ones own tweets

It looks like the members here are boycotting my tweets lol

Well dont know what to say other than sharmao mat

Would prefer posting here but thing is life is convoluted and a mess since some time , once its sorted will be here as i was previously
Fk no buddy I read most of your tweets just never comment on them bcs its just info next time I will like them to show appreciation
 

Vamsi

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
450
Likes
2,205
Country flag
No idea , first to develop a ground based dew

One needs to crawl before one can walk forget running
Correct me if I'm wrong ,but Isn't difficult to achieve soft kill using ground based DEW ,let say a satellite orbiting in a 300KM orbit, then the minimum distance between the satellite and ground based DEW will be 300KM and since it's not a small distance ,the DEW will require a lot of energy. If we use a Satellite based DEW, then our killer sat can go as near as possible and attack the enemy sat. In this method it DEW uses less energy when compared to ground based. This is just a thought, correct me if I'm wrong
 

flanker99

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2019
Messages
394
Likes
1,998
Country flag
Correct me if I'm wrong ,but Isn't difficult to achieve soft kill using ground based DEW ,let say a satellite orbiting in a 300KM orbit, then the minimum distance between the satellite and ground based DEW will be 300KM and since it's not a small distance ,the DEW will require a lot of energy. If we use a Satellite based DEW, then our killer sat can go as near as possible and attack the enemy sat. In this method it DEW uses less energy when compared to ground based. This is just a thought, correct me if I'm wrong
What he means that we are still taking baby on any kind of DeW not just ASAT.
Soft kill can be achieved through other ground based means i am not sure if we have those.
 

porky_kicker

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2016
Messages
5,624
Likes
40,375
Country flag
Correct me if I'm wrong ,but Isn't difficult to achieve soft kill using ground based DEW ,let say a satellite orbiting in a 300KM orbit, then the minimum distance between the satellite and ground based DEW will be 300KM and since it's not a small distance ,the DEW will require a lot of energy. If we use a Satellite based DEW, then our killer sat can go as near as possible and attack the enemy sat. In this method it DEW uses less energy when compared to ground based. This is just a thought, correct me if I'm wrong
Both ground based dew and space based dew both have their own set of problems to cater to

End of the day it depends on the capabilities of the developer , if they can they can develop both or the one which suits them , it will be done

IMO ground based dew will be easier , if we talking of laser or hpm AFAIK there is something called phase locking were multiple sources can be made to phase together for a amplified effect at greater ranges

IMO your observations regarding sat based dew is also feasible as long as the developer is upto the task
 

Vamsi

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
450
Likes
2,205
Country flag
Both ground based dew and space based dew both have their own set of problems to cater to

End of the day it depends on the capabilities of the developer , if they can they can develop both or the one which suits them , it will be done

IMO ground based dew will be easier , if we talking of laser or hpm AFAIK there is something called phase locking were multiple sources can be made to phase together for a amplified effect at greater ranges

IMO your observations regarding sat based dew is also feasible as long as the developer is upto the task
Can a 200Kg class small satellite provide the same 25cm resolution of 1600kg Cartosat-3, If not can it atleast provide 1m resolution?
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top