Don't repeat Iraq mistake in Syria, Russia warns America

AVERAGE INDIAN

EXORCIST
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
3,326
Likes
5,408
Country flag
MOSCOW: Russia said on Friday that US data on the Syrian regime's alleged use of chemical weapons was "unconvincing", and warned Washington against repeating the mistake it made when invading Iraq after falsely accusing Saddam Hussein of stocking weapons of mass destruction.

The Kremlin's top foreign policy adviser Yury Ushakov also said the US decision to provide military aid to Syrian rebels would damage international efforts to end a conflict that has left tens of thousands dead.

The Syrian war will take centre stage next week in Northern Ireland where global leaders â€" including Russian President Vladimir Putin â€" gather for a G8 summit.

Ushakov said US officials had recently presented Russia with new information about the alleged use of chemical weapons against rebels by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's forces.

"What was presented by the Americans does not look convincing to us," he told reporters.

"I would not want to make any parallels, I would not want to believe that this data can be similar to the situation with the vial that (US) secretary of state Colin Powell brandished at the famous security council meeting."

Ushakov was referring to a UN security council meeting in 2003 at which Powell held up a vial that he said could contain anthrax as he presented evidence of Iraq's alleged arms programmes.

Those weapons, cited by George W Bush's administration as the main motive for launching the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, never surfaced after the fall of the Baghdad regime.

The head of the Russian lower house of parliament's foreign affairs committee went even further than Ushakov, bluntly accusing Washington of making up claims that Assad had used chemical weapons against the rebels.

"Information about Assad's use of chemical weapons has been fabricated in the same place as the lies about (Saddam) Hussein's weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq, Alexei Pushkov said on Twitter.

"Why would Assad use sarin 'in small amounts' against the fighters? What is the sense?! In order to prompt outside intervention? It makes no sense," he wrote.

Ushakov said the chances of holding a Syrian peace conference that Russia and the United States proposed jointly in May would be hurt by Washington's plans to provide military support for the opposition.

"Of course, if the Americans truly decide and in reality provide more large-scale assistance to rebels, assistance to the opposition, it won't make the preparation of the international conference easier," said Ushakov.


Asked if the US decision to start arming the rebels would prompt Russia to proceed with the delivery of S-300 anti-aircraft missiles to the Damascus regime, Ushakov said: "We are not talking about this yet. We are not competing on Syria."

Putin has said that Russia has signed a contract for the S-300s' delivery without making any shipments yet.

Don't repeat Iraq mistake in Syria, Russia warns America - Times Of India
 

dhananjay1

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
3,291
Likes
5,544
Iraq wasn't a mistake, it was a war to install a regime that could be easily bent according to American will to get a greater control of dwindling oil reserve of the world. Thousands of Iraqi and a lot less western lives was a cheap price to pay for it, from an American point of view.
 

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
Iraq wasn't a mistake, it was a war to install a regime that could be easily bent according to American will to get a greater control of dwindling oil reserve of the world. Thousands of Iraqi and a lot less western lives was a cheap price to pay for it, from an American point of view.
You think there are reasons Other than oil and gas in the Syrian or Iranian situation?:cool2:
 

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
Iraq wasn't a mistake, it was a war to install a regime that could be easily bent according to American will to get a greater control of dwindling oil reserve of the world. Thousands of Iraqi and a lot less western lives was a cheap price to pay for it, from an American point of view.
Now the iraqi govt is more of a lackey of iran rather than usa.

In afghanistan also hostile taliban was removed and friendly northern alliance of iran is in govt, id say in long term iran has benefitted even though the yanks got the oil in the short term.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Is anybody in Obama administration even talking about chemical weapons at the moment?
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top