Documenting failures of westernization

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
I, wanted to start this thread & didn't use multiculturalism or multiracialism as we have that.

Here's one example:

('Multicultural') children are underperforming, as seen by their dropout rates in 2005: 15.4% in primary school (vs. 0.4% of all South Korean children); 39.7% in middle school (vs. 4.0%); and 69.6% in high school (vs. 8.7%)

http://www.unz.com/pfrost/the-changing-face-of-gangnam/

Here is another one:

http://www.unz.com/pfrost/they-really-did-start-it/

Partition due to demographics, yet many 'progressive' imbeciles
think they can achieve their utopia in face of external aggression.

Blood of North = Communist Utopia south

Atleast they're only 10%..
 
Last edited:

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
Last edited:

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
You see why 'caste' system so important?

It represents check against foreign expansion, as it represents something no foreigner can be NO matter what!

Otherwise, some nigerian will say 'I wanna become a Hindu' you have this unified Hindu identity all caste mixed Punjab to ahoms to tamils.

Then what? Will your future generation, live with 'legacy of caste'? Or regard it as, as outdated as nationalism.

Same India v Pak thing will play out where India tries to act ultra liberal to contrast Pak.
--
Many of you guys are kids, unknowing traitors.

This is why I give you last chance, it's only chance we have.. Not even mine to give but akaal purakh's I'm just following his dharam best I can in context I see.

W.e else is fate,

Radical Pluralism is suicide.
 

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
Conservatives, particularly in the Roman Catholic Church, were pointing out that liberalism would eventually destroy all traditional identities—the family, gender, kinship, ethnicity. Since these identities are nonconsensual, they violate liberal principles of personal freedom and individual choice. People do not get to choose their family, gender, kinfolk, or ethnic background. Thus, sooner or later, liberalism would cause these identities to dissolve away, under the influence of universal education, the increased mobility of people, and the ability of the market economy to offer more lucrative ways of organizing one’s life. Communists were seen as people who wanted to
accelerate the process, by using the brute power of the State. This was “liberalism in a hurry”—the path initially taken by the Soviet Union, one of the new states to emerge after WWI.

-
@Bangalorean @Mad Indian
@Dovah
http://www.unz.com/pfrost/the-last-push-back-against-liberalism/
 

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
Nationalism

Today, the word “nationalist” is applied to parties like the Front National in France or the PVV in the Netherlands that are more properly called anti-globalist or perhaps anti-replacement, since their main goal is to halt the demographic replacement of native Europeans.

This was not the meaning of “nationalist” in the early 20th century and even less so in the 19th. Back then, nationalists had initially allied themselves with liberals in a common project to emancipate the individual from parochialism—emotional attachment to little regions that often had their own dialects, customs, and sense of belonging. The individual would henceforth identify with a much larger nation-state and be able to circulate over a much larger territory thanks to a common citizenship, a common language, and a common identity. Nationalism was thus the first step in a process that would lead to today’s globalism

This logic was carried over into the fascist movements of the early 20th century. The desire to create larger, more uniform nation-states led to repression of national minorities and moves to seize territory from other countries. By abolishing local and regional cultures, and by creating an ersatz national culture in their place, these movements helped to pave the way for the deracinated individualism that is now the norm in most Western societies.
--
Hmm, but Sardaar Ji must be wrong we must eliminate casteism & have 'equality'.

ONLY THEN CAN WE COMMIT MASS SUICIDE LIKE GORAS, BHAJI!

@Blackwater @FRYCRY what u think, especially frycry aaptard.
 

J.A.

Militants
Regular Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Messages
274
Likes
29
Nobody in Western world are communist only nigers of Cuba are maybe true but they are kind of UK A island group so United States can not attacking Cuba in military.

Have I right about Cuba ?? Communist nigers of island's.
 

J.A.

Militants
Regular Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Messages
274
Likes
29
Nationalism

Today, the word “nationalist” is applied to parties like the Front National in France or the PVV in the Netherlands that are more properly called anti-globalist or perhaps anti-replacement, since their main goal is to halt the demographic replacement of native Europeans.

This was not the meaning of “nationalist” in the early 20th century and even less so in the 19th. Back then, nationalists had initially allied themselves with liberals in a common project to emancipate the individual from parochialism—emotional attachment to little regions that often had their own dialects, customs, and sense of belonging. The individual would henceforth identify with a much larger nation-state and be able to circulate over a much larger territory thanks to a common citizenship, a common language, and a common identity. Nationalism was thus the first step in a process that would lead to today’s globalism

This logic was carried over into the fascist movements of the early 20th century. The desire to create larger, more uniform nation-states led to repression of national minorities and moves to seize territory from other countries. By abolishing local and regional cultures, and by creating an ersatz national culture in their place, these movements helped to pave the way for the deracinated individualism that is now the norm in most Western societies.
--
Hmm, but Sardaar Ji must be wrong we must eliminate casteism & have 'equality'.

ONLY THEN CAN WE COMMIT MASS SUICIDE LIKE GORAS, BHAJI!

@Blackwater @FRYCRY what u think, especially frycry aaptard.
Swedish Democrats are racism and fascist portion in Sweden + the largest portion of raise in Sweden. SD have mandat in EU parlament and in Sweden they is 3rd biggest portion of last year poll in Sweden.

SD is nationalism like Front National in France it is fact in Wikipedia. Christ of rights one of many names on SD in nationalism but they are really racism and fascist portion many call them in Sweden.

They never call them for nazi portion because they maybe have problem anti Nazi's.
 

J.A.

Militants
Regular Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Messages
274
Likes
29
Radical Pluralism is suicide.
I call pluralism for Etnopluralism. Every Finns, Swede, Danish, Indian etc have right to voite on one Etnopluralism portion at home if they exist's there one or more.
 

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
Nobody can understand you @J.A.

--
Basically why did Europe develop?

Is it wrong to analyze the model & copy it no?

Why is Europe dying?
Is it wrong to not follow them into suicide? Yes. If you listen to progressives

--
Europe had strong states in e europe which kept out foreigners plus, variety of tribes, identities, nations which competed leading to development.
--
We can recreate that with classical 'strong but limited Chanakyan' state with local autonomy.

Added advantage is, due to plenty of external enemies unlikely to have our version world war 1 and 2.

Especially as the South faces naval threats from Saudi + Usa

North against China + Pak w.e
--
Give states more autonomy, and take away this 'democracy' nonsense.

Ruler should listen to people, not 'obey' them.

What about people who say what if ruler corrupt?

You rebel, because if your democracy corrupt = oligarchic ruler you rebel by nessecity anyway.

Your special gora saab devta Plato or aristotle also said philosopher king is best.

What to do in mean time to 'reform' democracy? Not my problem, not my job..

Here's some '****** music' for you to enjoy as the worst something is the better it is.

Better to be like Mao, shoot the traitors naive & intentional & move on.

Yes the anti-abrahamic 'casteist have co-opted' Mao now?!
 

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
'A community of strangers, is no community at all'

That's why nationalism & globalism will fail.

They are meant to fail though,

As they must for the nation between two rivers (Nile & Euphrates) to exist.

I'm not into this, so I have will to fight.

Do u?

 
Last edited:

Screambowl

Ghanta Senior Member?
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,950
Likes
7,908
Country flag
west is just bunch of over working people in their fields. Well , they have forgotton that world does exist around their sphere.
The system does not let you think anything apart from work.

But the best minds in the world who have lived normally, and worked for their own development are brainwashed by them and called to work for west. specially US.

In europe, people care less about indivisual earning but, more about state sponsored facility. In US it is the opposite. Europe is still highly socialist, exlcuding England.

In west Liberty, etc does not get implimented by the governments who support it. It is only for their greater agenda and to demonstrate rest of the world that they have such a free system and others should also adopt this. Which is a lie.
 
Last edited:

punjab47

महाबलामहावीर्यामहासत्यपराक्रमासर्वाग्रेक्षत्रियाजट
Banned
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
1,059
Likes
598
three main population groups in Iraq are Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs and Kurds. The US war in Iraq was waged specifically against Sunni Arabs (Saddam’s people). They constitute around 15% of the total. The population of the entire country was 28.4 million in 2005. There would have been between 4 and 4.5 million Sunni Arabs in Iraq at the war’s height. They are the ones who bore most of the losses.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top