Demystification of the Islamic Rule in India

Status
Not open for further replies.

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
A lot has been said about the peace and prosperity that was abound in India during the Islamic Rule. Even British historians in their zeal to win over Muslims as their allies distorted the true history of the Indian subcontinent under Muslim rule. Apparently most Islamic nations including the breakaway nations of Pakistan and Bangladesh report a distorted version of Indian history under the Muslim rule. In this fabricated version of Islamic History India every attempt has been made by Muslim to portray Muslim rulers as great Secularist, which is an oxymoron in itself, compared to the native Indian kings who are portrayed as Cowards and incestuous rulers.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wole Soyinka, African Nobel Laureate, while delivering the 20th Nehru Memorial Lecture on November 13, 1988, made an important, though by no means a new, observation that the colonial histories have been written from the European viewpoint. Speaking about Indian histories, he said that there is a big question mark on everything that the British historians have written. He added that serious efforts are being made by historians back home to rewrite African history. Perhaps the time has come to rewrite the true Indian history but by historians of the subcontinent. Thanks to the attitude of Indian politicians and leftist historians, who dominate the scene, no effort has been made to unearth the true history is Islamic rule. Even the mere mention of the excess committed by Muslims on the natives is considered as non-Kosher. However thanks to Internet Forums such as FFI and Islam-Watch, the truth can finally be told and it is the truth that will eventually set us free. The barbarities of Muslim rulers cover no bounds. The Islamic rule in India covers large number of topics and a span of almost 700 years. It is not possible to cover all of these in one article. I will, therefore, break up my presentation into a series of articles which will cover various topics.

It is common knowledge that, if you want to break a people, all you have to do is to attack their belief system. This was precisely the objective of Muslim rulers who came to India. The best way to undermine the Hindus and Buddhists in their own country was to destroy their Temples and Viharas and this is exactly what the Muslim rulers did.

There are several books in which the Muslim scholars of yore have recorded the barbarism of the Muslim rulers; they devoted scrolls of paper to prove the destruction of the native Indian psyche. Of course, the Muslim theologians of today don't put these treatises on display for they might just demolish the beautiful picture of Islam they paint in front of the world. So I will not give any arguments of my own, rather I will let the history written by the Muslim scholars themselves do the talking.

The literary evidence stated below is in chronological order with reference to the time at which a particular work was written. Below I have listed the sources of my information, the authors of the treatises and the exact quotes from their books.
___________________________________________________________________________

Name Of The Book: Hindustan Islami Ahad mein (India under Islamic Rule)

Name Of The Historian: Maulana Abdul Hai.

About The Author: He is a highly respected scholar and taken as an authority on Islamic history. Because ofhis scholarship and his services to Islam, Maulana Abdul Hai was appointed as the Rector of the DarulNadwa Ullum Nadwatal-Ulama. He continued in that post till his death in February 1923.

The following section is taken from the chapter Hindustan ki Masjidein (The mosques of India) of the above-mentioned book. Here we can see a brief description of a few important mosques in India and how each one of them was built upon plundered Hindu temples.

1. Qawwat al-Islam Mosque at Delhi:

""According to my findings the first mosque of Delhi is Qubbat al-Islam or Quwwat al_Islam which, Qutubud-Din Aibak constructed in H. 587 after demolishing the hindu temple built by Prithvi Raj and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper; and when he returned from Ghazni in H. 592 he started building, under orders from Shihabud -Din Ghori, a huge mosque of inimitable red stones, and certain parts of the temple were included in the mosque..."
"2. The Mosque at Jaunpur:

""This was built by Sultan Ibrahim Sharqi with chiseled stones. Originally it was a Hindu temple after demolishing which he constructed the mosque. It is known as the Atala Masjid.."
"3. The Mosque at Qanauj:

""It is well known that this mosque was built on the foundations of some Hindu temple that stood here. The mosque was built by Ibrahim Sharqi in H. 809 as is recorded in Gharbat Nigar"
"4. Jami Masjid at Etwah:

""This mosque stands on the bank of the Jamuna at Etawah. There was a Hindu temple at this place, on the site of which this mosque was constructed.."
"5. Babri Masjid at Ayodhya:

""This mosque was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which Hindus call the birth place of Ramchandraji...Sita had a temple here in which she lived and cooked for her husband. On that very site Babar constructed this mosque in H. 963 "
"6. Mosque at Benaras:

""Mosque of Benares was built by Alamgir Aurangzeb on the site of Bisheshwar Temple. That temple was very tall and held as holy among Hindus. On this very site and with those very stones he constructed a lofty mosque, and its ancient stones were rearranged after being embedded in the walls of the mosque. It is one of the renowned mosques of Hindustan."
"7. Mosque at Mathura:

""Alamgir Aurangzeb built a mosque at Mathura. This mosque was built on site of the Govind Dev Temple which was very strong and beautiful as well as exquisite.."

--------------------------------------------------
Name Of The Book: Futuhu'l-Buldan

Name Of The Historian: Ahmed bin Yahya bin Jabir

About The Author: This author is also known as al- Biladhuri. He lived at the court of Khalifa Al- Mutawakkal (AD 847-861) and died in AD 893. His history is one of the major Arab chronicles.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

1. Ibn Samurah (AD 653) Siestan (Iran)

""On reaching Dawar, he surrounded the enemy in the mountain of Zur, where there was a famous Hindu temple. ...Their idol of Zur was of gold, and its eyes were two rubies. The zealous Musalmans cut off its hands and plucked out its eyes, and then remarked to the Marzaban how powerless was his idol..."
"2. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (r. 705-715) Samarkand (Farghana)

""Other authorities say that Kutaibah granted peace for 700,000 dirhams and entertainment for the Moslems for three days. The terms of surrender included also the houses of the idols and the fire temples. The idols were thrown out, plundered of their ornaments and burned..."
"3. Mohammed bin Qasim (r. 712-715) Debal (Sindh)

"...The town was thus taken by assault, and the carnage endured for three days. The governor of the town, appointed by Dahir, fled and the priests of the temple were massacred. Muhammad marked a place for the Musalmans to dwell in, built a mosque, and left 4,000 Musalmans to garrison the place..."

"...'Ambissa son of Ishak Az Zabbi, the governor of Sindh, in the Khilafat of Mu'tasim billah knocked down the upper part of the minaret of the temple and converted it into a prison..."
Multan (Punjab)

"...He then crossed the Biyas, and went towards Multan...Muhammad destroyed the water-course; upon which the inhabitants, oppressed with thirst, surrendered at discretion. He massacred the men capable of bearing arms, but the children were taken captive, as well as ministers of the temple, to the number of 6,000. The Musalmans found there much gold in a chamber ten cubits long by eight broad..."

4. Hasham bin 'Amru al-Taghlab Khandahar (Maharashtra)

""He then went to Khandahar in boats and conquered it. He destroyed the Budd (idol) there, and built in its place a mosque."

"--------------
Name Of The Book: Tarikh-i-Tabari

Name Of The Historian: Abu Ja'far Muhammad bin Jarir at-Tabari

About The Author: This author is considered to be the foremost historian of Islam. The above mentioned book written by him is regarded as the mother of histories.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

1. Qutaibah bin Muslim al-Bahili (AD 705-715) Beykund (Khurasan)

"The ultimate capture of Beykund (in AD 706) rewarded him with an incalculable booty; even more than had hitherto fallen into the hands of the Mohammedans by the conquest of the entire province of Khorassaun; and the unfortunate merchants of the town, having been absent on a trading excursion while their countrywas assailed by the enemy, and finding their habitations desolate on their return contributed further to enrich the invaders, by the ransom which they paid for the recovery of their wives and children. The ornaments alone, of which these women had been plundered, being melted down, produce, in gold, 150,000 meskals; of a dram and a half each. Among the articles of the booty, is also described an image of gold, of 50,000 meskals, of which the eyes were two pearls, the exquisite beauty and magnitude of which excited the surprise and admiration of Kateibah. They were transmitted by him, with a fifth of the spoil to Hejauje, together with a request that he might be permitted to distribute, to the troops, the arms which had been found in the palace in great profusion."

Samarkand (Farghan "A breach was, however, at last effected in the walls of the city in AD 712 by the warlike machines ofKateibah; and some of the most daring of its defenders having fallen by the skill of his archers, the besieged demanded a cessation of arms to the following day, when they promised to capitulate. The request was acceded to the Kateibah; and a treaty was the next day accordingly concluded between him and the prince of Samarkand, by which the latter engaged for the annual payment of ten million of dhirems, and a supply of three thousand slaves; of whom it was particularly stipulated, that none should either be in a state of infancy, or ineffective from old age and debility. He further contracted that the ministers of his religion should be expelled from their temples and their idols destroyed and burnt; that Kateibah should be allowed to establish a mosque in the place of the principal temple...."

"...Kateibah accordingly set set fire to the whole collection with his own hands; it was soon consumed to ashes, and 50,000 meskals of gold and silver, collected from the nails which had been used in the workmanship of the images."

2. Yaqub bin Laith (r. 870-871 Balkh and Kabul (Afghanistan)

""He took Bamian, which he probably reached by way of Herat, and then marched on Balkh where he ruined (the temple) Naushad. On his way back from Balkh he attacked Kabul..."

"Starting from Panjhir, the place he is known to have visited, he must have passed through the capital city of the Hindu Sahis to rob the sacred temple -- the reputed place of coronation of the Sahi rulers -- of its sculptural wealth..."

"The exact details of the spoil collected from Kabul valley are lacking. The Tarikh [-i-Sistan] records 50 idols of gold and silver and Mas'udi mentions elephants. The wonder excited in Baghdad by Baghdad by elephants and pagan idols forwarded to the Caliph by Ya'qub also speaks for their high value."
"---------------
Name Of The Book: Tarikhu'l-Hind

Name Of The Historian: Abu Rihan Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Biruni al-Khwarizmi.

About The Author: This author spent 40 years in India during the reign of Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (r. 997-1030). His history treats of the literature and learning of the Hindus at the commencement of the 11th century.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

1. Jalam ibn Shaiban (9th century) Multan (Punjab)

"A famous idol of theirs was that of Multan, dedicated to the sun, and therefore called Aditya. It was of wood and covered with red Cordovan leather; in its two eyes were two red rubies. It is said to have been made in the last Kritayuga .....When Muhammad Ibn Alkasim Ibn Almunaibh conquered Multan, he inquired how the town had become so very flourishing and so many treasures had there been accumulated, and then he found out that this idol was the cause, for there came pilgrims from all sides to visit it. Therefore he thought it best to have the idol where it was, but he hung a piece of cow's flesh on its neck by way of mockery. On the same place a mosque was built. When the Karmatians occupied Multan, Jalam Ibn Shaiban, the usurper, broke the idol into pieces and killed its priests..."

2. Sultan Mahmud of Gazni (AD 997-103 Thanesar (Haryana)

""The city of Taneshar is highly venerated by Hindus. The idol of that place is called Cakrasvamin, i.e. the owner of the cakra, a weapon which we have already described. It is of bronze, and is nearly the size of a man. It is now lying in the hippodrome in Ghazna, together with the Lord of Somnath, which is a representation of the penis of the Mahadeva, called Linga."
"3. Somnath (Gujrat)

""The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natan means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon. The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! --AH 416. He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroidered garments. Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with Cakrasvamin , an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar. Another part of the idol from Somnath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet."
"---------------
Name Of The Book: Kitabu'l-Yamini

Name Of The Historian: Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn Muhammad al Jabbaru'l-Utbi.

About The Author: This author's work comprises the whole of the reign of Subuktigin and that of Sultan Mahmud down to the year AD 1020.

The Muslim Rulers He Wrote About:

1. Amir Sbuktigin of Ghazni Lamghan (Afghanistan)

""The Amir marched out towards Lamghan, which is a city celebrated for its great strength and abounding wealth. He conquered it and set fire to the places in its vicinity which were inhabited by infidels, and demolishing idol temples, he established Islam in them. He marched and captured other cities and killed the polluted wretches, destroying the idolaters and gratifying the Musulmans."
"2. Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (AD 997-1030) Narain (Rajasthan)

""The Sultan again resolved on an expedition to Hind, and marched towards Narain, urging his horses and moving over ground, hard and soft, until he came to the middle of Hind, where he reduced chiefs, who, up to that time obeyed no master, overturned their idols, put to the sword the vagabonds of that country, and with delay and circumspection proceeded to accomplish his design..."
"3. Nardin (Punjab)

"After the Sultan had purified Hind from idolatry, and raised mosques therein, he determined to invade the capital of Hind to punish those who kept idols and would not acknowledge the unity of God...He marched with a large army in the year AH 404 (AD 1013) during a dark night..."

"A stone was found there in the temple of the great Budda on which an inscription was written purporting that the temple had been founded 50,000 years ago. The Sultan was surprised at the ignorance of these people, because those who believe in the true faith represent that only seven hundred years have elapsed since the creation of the world, and the signs of resurrection are even now approaching .The Sultan asked his wise men the meaning of this inscription and they all concurred in saying that it was false, and no faith was to be put in the evidence of a stone."

4. Thanesar (Haryana)

""The chief of Tanesar was...obstinate in his infidelity and denial of God. So the Sultan marched against him with his valiant warriors, for the purpose of planting the standards of Islam and extirpating idolatry.."

"The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discolored, not withstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it...The victory gained by God's grace, who has established Islam for ever as the best religions, notwithstanding that idolaters revolt against it...Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honor he bestows upon Islam and Musulmans."
"5. Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)

"The Sultan then departed from the environs of the city, in which was a temple of the Hindus. The name of this place was Mahartul Hind... On both sides of the city there were a thousand houses, to which idol temples were attached, all strengthened from top to bottom by rivets of iron, and all made of masonry work..."

"In the middle of the city there was a temple larger and firmer than the rest, which can neither be described nor painted. The Sultan thus wrote respecting it: --'If any should wish to construct a building equal to this, he would not be able to do it without expending an 100,000,000 red dinars, and it would occupy 200 years even though the most experience and able workmen were employed'... The Sultan gave orders that all temples should be burnt with naptha and fire, and leveled with the ground."

6. Kanauj (Uttar Pradesh)

""In Kanauj there were nearly 10,000 temples, which the idolaters falsely and absurdly represented to have been founded by their ancestors two or three hundred thousand years ago...Many of the inhabitants of the place fled and were scattered abroad like so many wretched widows and orphans, from the fear which oppressed them, in consequence of witnessing the fate of their deaf and dumb idols. Many of them thus affected their escape, and those who did not fly were put to death."
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
Name of the Book: Diwan-i-Salman

Name of the Historian: Khawajah Masud bin Sa'd bin Salman

About the Author: Khawajah Masud bin Sa'd bin Salman was a poet. He wrote poems in praise of the Ghaznavid Sultans- Masu'd, Ibrahim and Bahram Shah. He died sometime between AD 1126 and 1131. The Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Sultan Abu'l Muzaffar Ibrahim (AD 1059-1099)

"As power and the strength of a lion was bestowed upon Ibrahim by the Almighty, he made over to him the well-populated country of Hindustan and gave him 40,000 valiant horsemen to take the country, in which there were more than 1000 rais.The army of the king destroyed at one time a thousand temples of idols, which had each been built for more than a thousand years. How can I describe the victories of the King..."

Jalandhar (Punjab)

"The narrative of any battles eclipses the stories of Rustam and Isfandiyar. By morning meal, not one soldier, not one Brahmin remained unslaughtered or uncaptured. Their heads were leveled with the ground with flaming fire. Thou have secured the victory to the country and to religion, for amongst the Hindus this achievement will be remembered till the day of resurrection."

Malwa (Madhya Pradesh)

"...On this journey, the army detsroyed a thousand idol-temples and thy elephants trampled over more than a hundred strongholds. Thou didst march thy army to Ujjan; the lip of infidelity became dry through fear of thee, the eye of plural-worship became blind..."

____________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Book: Chach-Namah

Name of the Historian: Mohammed Al bin Hamid bin Abu Bakr Kufi

About the Author: The Persian history was translated from Arabic by the above mentioned author in the time of Nasiruddin Qabacha, a slave of Mohammed Ghori.

The Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Mohammed bin Qasim (AD 712-715)

Siwistan and Sisam (Sindh) Mohammed bin Qasem wrote to al-Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq:

"The forts of Siwistan and Sism have been already taken. The nephew of Dahir, his warriors and principal officers have been dispatched, and infidels converted to Islam or destroyed. Instead of idol temples, mosques and other places of worship have been built, pulpits have been erected, the Khutba is read, and the call to prayers is raised so that devotions are performed at sacred hours."

Multan (Punjab)

..."Mohammed Qasem arose and with his counsellors, guards and attendants went to the temple. He saw there an idol made of gold. And its two eyes were bright red rubies. "..Muhammed Qasem ordered the idol to be taken up. Two hundred and thirty "mans" of gold were brought to the treasury together with the gems and pearls and treasures which were obtained from the plunder of Multan. "

____________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Book: Jamiu'l-Hikayat

Name of the Historian: Maulana Nuruddin Muhammed `Ufi

About the Author: The author was born in or near the city of Bukhara in Transoxiana. He came to India and lived in Delhi for some time in the reign of Shamsu'd-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236).

The Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Amru bin Laith (AD 879-900)

Sakawand (Afghanistan)

"It is related that Amru Lais conferred the governorship of Zabulistan on Fardaghan and sent him there at the head of four thousand horses. There was a large Hindu place of worship in that country, which was called Sakawand and people, used to come on pilgrimage from the most remote parts of Hindustan to the idols of that place. When Fardaghan arrived in Zabulistan he led his army against it, took the temple, broke the idols in pieces and overthrew the idolaters..."

_____________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Book: Taju'l-Ma'sir

Name of the Historian: Sadru'd-Din Muhammed Hasan Nizamii

About the author: The author was born at Nishapur in Khurasan. He had to leave his ancestral place because of the Mongol invasion. He came to India and started writing his history in AD 1205.

The Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Sultan Muhammed Ghuri (AD 1175-1206)

Ajmer (Rajasthan)

"He destroyed the pillars and foundations of the idol temples and built in their stead mosques and colleges, and the precepts of Islam, and the customs of the law were divulged and established..."

Kuhram and Samana (Punjab)

"The Government of the fort of Kohram and Samana were made over by the Sultan to Kutuu-din.He purged by his sword the land of Hind from the filth of infidelity and vice, and freed it from the thorn of God-plurality, and the impurity of idol-worship and by his royal vigour and intrepidity, left not one temple standing..."

Meerut (Uttar Pradesh)

"Kutub-d din marched from Kohran and when he arrived at Meerut which is one of the celebrated forts of the country of Hind, for the strength of its foundations and superstructure, and its ditch, which was as broad as the ocean and fathomless- an army joined him, sent by the dependent chiefs of the country. The fort was captured, and a Kotwal was appointed to take up his station in the fort, and all the idol temples were converted into mosques."

Delhi

"He then marched and encamped under the fort of Delhi...The city and its vicinity was freed from idols and idol-worships, and in the sanctuaries of the images of the Gods, mosques were raised by the worshippers of one God. Kutub-d din built the Jami Masjid at Delhi and adorned it with stones and gold obtained from the temples which had been demolished by the elephants, and covered it with inscriptions in Toghra, containing the divine commands."

Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)

"From that place (Asni) the royal army proceeded towards Benares which is the center of the country of Hind and here they destroyed nearly 1000 temples, and raised mosques on their foundations and the knowledge of the law became promulgated, and the foundations of religion were established.."

Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh)

"There was a certain tribe in the neighbourhood of Kol which had occasioned much trouble. Three bastions were raised as high as heaven with their heads, and their carcasses became the food of beasts of prey. That tract was freed from idols and idol-worship and the foundation of infidelity were destroyed".

Bayana (Rajasthan)

"When Kutub-d din heard of Sultan's march from Ghazna, he was much rejoiced and advanced as far as Hansi (a place in Rajasthan) to meet him. In the year AH 592 (AD 1196), they marched towards Thangar, and the center of idolatry and perdition became the abode of glory and splendour..."

Kalinjar (Uttar Pradesh)

"In the year AH 599 (Ad 1202), Kutub-d din proceeded to the investment Kalinjar, on which expedition he was accompanied by the Sahib-Kiran, Shamsu-d din Altmash... The temples were converted into mosques and abodes of goodness, and the ejaculations of bead counters and voices of summoners to prayer ascended to high heaven, and the very name of idolatry was annihilated."

2. Sultan Shamsu'd-Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236)

Delhi

"The Sultan then returned from Jalor to Delhi. And after his arrival 'not a vestige or name remained of idol temples which had raised their heads on high; and the light of faith shone out from the darkness of infidelity. And the moon of religion and the state became resplendent from the heaven of prosperity and glory."

_____________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Book: Kamilu't-Tawarikh

Name of the Historian: Ibn Asir

About the author: The author was born in AD 1160 in the Jazirat ibn Umar, an island on the Tigris above Mosul.

The Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Khalifa Al-Mahdi (AD 775-785)

Barada (Gujrat)

"In the year 159 (AD 776) Al Mahdi sent an army by sea under Abdul Malik bin Shahabu'l Musamma'i to India. They proceeded on their way and at length disembarked at Barada (Baroda/Vadodra). When they reached the place they laid siege on it. The town was reduced to extremities and God prevailed over it in the same year. The people were forbidden to worship the Budd (idol), which the Muhammadans burned."

____________________________________________________________________

Name of the Book: Tarikh-i-Jahan-Kusha

Name Of The Historian: Alaud-Din Malik ibn Bahaud-Din Muhammed Juwaini

About the author: The author was born a native of Juwain in Khurasan near Nishapur. He was the Halaku during the Mongol campaign against the Ismai'lians and was later appointed the governor of Baghdad. He fell from grace and was imprisoned at Hamadan.

The Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Sultan Jalalud-Din Mankbarni (AD 1222-1231)

Debal (Sindh)

"The Sultan then went towards Dewal and darbela and Jaisi. The Sultan raised Masjid at Dewal, on the spot where an idol temple stood."

____________________________________________________________________________

Name of the Book: Mifathu'l-Futuh

Name of the Historian: Amir Khusru

About the author: The author, Amir Khusru, was born in Delhi in 1253. His father occupied high positions in the reigns of Sultan Shamsu'd Din Iltutmish (AD 1210-1236) and his successors. Reputed to be the dearest disciple of Sheikh Nizamuddin Auliya, he became the lick-spittle of whoever came out victorious in the contest for the throne at Delhi. He became the court poet of Balban's successor, Sultan Kaiqbad. He is regarded as a secular Sufi Saint by the general population in India. The curriculum history books in India describe him as a man of love and peace.

Muslim rulers he wrote about:

1. Sultan Jajalu'd-Din Khalji (AD 1290-1296)

Jhain (Rajasthan)

"The Sultan reached Jhain in the afternoon of the third day and stayed in the palace of the Raya he greatly enjoyed his stay for some time. Coming out, ho took a round of gardens and temples. The idols he saw amazed him... Next day he got those idols of gold smashed with stones. The pillars of wood were burnt down by his order... A cry rose from the temples as if a second Mahmud has taken birth. Two idols were made of brass, one of which weighed nearly thousand "mans" (a measure of weight).He got both of them broken, and the pieces were distributed among his people so that they may throw them at the door of Masjid on their return to Delhi."

1. Sultan Alaud-Din Khilji (AD 1296-1316)

Vidisha (Madhya Pradesh)

"When he advanced from the capital of Karra, the Hindus, in alarm, descended into the earth like ants. He departed towards the garden of Behar to dye that soil with blood as red as tulip. He cleared the road to Ujjain of vile wretches, and created consternation in Bhilsan. When he affected his conquests in that country, hew drew out of the river the idols which had been concealed in it.

Devagiri (Maharshtra)

"But see the mercy with which he regarded the broken-hearted, for, after seizing the rai (kingdom), he set him free again. He destroyed the temples of the idolaters, and erected pulpits and arches for mosques. "





What you have read above are not merely quotations from books written by people in the distant past. They are in fact real life events which must have devastated millions of native Indians. That was the time when Muslims were a powerful force, so in their arrogance they left their misdeeds recorded by their own writers. However we must not forget that life comes around full circle. With Islam spreading its tentacles around the world, who knows history might just be repeated on a much larger scale. Who knows, just maybe!
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
now my attempt is not to create discord between two communities but my intention here is to let people know the other side of islamic rule in India
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
mind providing links?????? or is it just ur write up?
 

Rebelkid

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
453
Likes
24
now my attempt is not to create discord between two communities but my intention here is to let people know the other side of islamic rule in India
EDIT: 1000nds of people read the forums...please refrain from posting such threads which can cause hatred against a certain riligion..

MOds..close this thread
 
Last edited:

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
now my attempt is not to create discord between two communities but my intention here is to let people know the other side of islamic rule in India
So What is the real issue???if you want to look into history as an academician then why limit yourself only to the muslim rule.why not go deep into history lets say Mauryans even huns guptas Asoka's devastations of kalinga or go more back to alexande's devastation of gandhra(present day afghanistan and NWFP)....how about british genocide and for that matter Portuguese genocide in goa.If you are limiting yourself only to muslim rulers then you gonna do great injustice to real history behind the veil of which you 've started this thread.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
If you want to look into the destruction of hindu temples by muslim armies then why not also look into the issues of hindu kings destroyin and stealing statues from other conquered hindu kingdom...Do you wish to dwell in past or move away from it learning something good of it.....
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
Super Mod
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,772
Thread closed pending further decision on whether to let this thread continue or not.
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
if members what i will make this thread approved only thread means ..every post will be pending when approved by the mods then appear if its fine then let it continue if not then .... thread remains closed as forum policies does not direct us to have debates on ethnic/religious lines ...........
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
So What is the real issue???if you want to look into history as an academician then why limit yourself only to the muslim rule.why not go deep into history lets say Mauryans even huns guptas Asoka's devastations of kalinga or go more back to alexande's devastation of gandhra(present day afghanistan and NWFP)....how about british genocide and for that matter Portuguese genocide in goa.If you are limiting yourself only to muslim rulers then you gonna do great injustice to real history behind the veil of which you 've started this thread.
like i said ,only to let people know the other side of islamic rule in india , if islamic rulers have brought destruction and so why are we afraid to talk about it , it is like saying that hanging a certain muslim terrorist will bring about law and order situation ( as you can see what is happeneing in delhi )
and if anyone wants to post about what Hindu kings did ,then very well i have no objection
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
If you want to look into the destruction of hindu temples by muslim armies then why not also look into the issues of hindu kings destroyin and stealing statues from other conquered hindu kingdom...Do you wish to dwell in past or move away from it learning something good of it.....
well all people know that muslim rulers were all good in india , what is wrong with knowing the truth , and if hindu kings have done the same thing ,then that should also come to light
i do not get ,is there is something not good about muslim rule in medival india , why are afraid to tall about it , it not like i am making all this up
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
to generalize the doings of certain kings/rulers as a whole on the community of a particular religion is not correct .... if you want to discuss let there be not discretion based on religion leave out religion discuss the historical significance ..............
 

truthfull

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
96
Likes
7
those who want this thread to be cloed are in category of pseudo secularists ,they dont see any fault in musil fundamerntalism, i will put them in category of phobiatic like shila dixit if afzal is hanged then law and order problem in delhi. thread shoukld continue ,baseless suggestion are coming form members as they are LSO SENIOR MEMBERS.
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
to generalize the doings of certain kings/rulers as a whole on the community of a particular religion is not correct .... if you want to discuss let there be not discretion based on religion leave out religion discuss the historical significance ..............
with all due respect MR A.V , if you read the article , 90% of the atrocities were done by bigoted muslim rulers ( and i am not implying that todays Indian muslims are bigoted too) .and the bad part of it is that the histroy ( sadly written by seudo secularist ) have said nothing about muslim rulers atrocities . So this is my humble attempt to let people know the other side of muslim rule in india
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
those who want this thread to be cloed are in category of pseudo secularists ,they dont see any fault in musil fundamerntalism, i will put them in category of phobiatic like shila dixit if afzal is hanged then law and order problem in delhi. thread shoukld continue ,baseless suggestion are coming form members as they are LSO SENIOR MEMBERS.
thank you so much , finally some support
 

AkhandBharat

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
542
Likes
79
I second the notion that the atrocities committed by Muslim invaders and their dynasty should be openly discussed in public. When the british occupation can be discussed openly, why can't the subjugation and inhumane atrocities committed by muslim rulers be discussed? I would love to discuss how the mughals brought about the downfall of India by subjugation and how it affected the morale of the people all over India, and when the british arrived, the Indian junta had already lost its patriotism because of subjugation and humiliation. Heck the Indian army fought valiantly under British rule, because it was much better than the mughal occupation of India.
 

AJSINGH

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
1,237
Likes
77
I second the notion that the atrocities committed by Muslim invaders and their dynasty should be openly discussed in public. When the british occupation can be discussed openly, why can't the subjugation and inhumane atrocities committed by muslim rulers be discussed? I would love to discuss how the mughals brought about the downfall of India by subjugation and how it affected the morale of the people all over India, and when the british arrived, the Indian junta had already lost its patriotism because of subjugation and humiliation. Heck the Indian army fought valiantly under British rule, because it was much better than the mughal occupation of India.
thank you, i see i am gathering support here ,otherwise , seudo secularist on DFI were deciding to close it down ( it is not targeted towards Mr A.V)
 

Phenom

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
878
Likes
406
What else do you guys want to discuss about?
How about Mauryan raids into Kalinga that is said to have been pretty brutal as well
How about Maratha raids into Rajastan, that wasn't pretty either
How about Pindari raids from Maratha lands into Southern India
How about a thousand other cases were One Indian empire has commited atrocities against another.

The fact is we don't read about any of this in our history books as well. And the reason is simple, this would just cause animosity between people today. India faces enough problems as it is, the last thing we need is to start reliving battles that are hundreds of years old.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top