BBC is, to put it mildly, a fairy tale website, something in the lines of J. K. Rowling.
BBC, internationally recognised news organ. RT, state propaganda reported to Ofcom. Says it all really.
You've read it? Good. So, you got your answer to your question about "source." That chapter is closed then.
Really? You believe all blogs? I'll post the blogs about RT cock ups if you like?
I believe in anything that doesn't come out of BBC and NYT.
The Guardian? Sky News? Or is it just all western media?
I have Googled Sukhoi-25's stuff. Thanks. Now, you Google the difference between Service Ceiling and Max Operating Altitude.
Service ceiling and max operating altitude. Difference is one where it is designed to work and the other, where it could possibly get to with a prevailing wind, a lot of luck, good conditions etc.
The SU25 according to the designer can't get to 10.5km, let alone intercept (it's slower, so can't chase) a 777 and somehow engage an airliner with a heat seeking missile that doesn't have forward lock on ability and somehow not hit one engine but hit the crew compartment and then the 'mud mover' somehow gets near to the 777 and rakes it with cannon fire. Of all the conspiracy theories, it really is a poor one.
I want the truth. Whether it's Ukrainians', Separatists, Russians or flying saucers. That way 298 innocent lives can be accounted for. Sadly, I believe the Buk crew is now dead and we'll never get the truth because Russia will not cooperate.
Don't use "undoubtedly" when doubts exist. It's like saying "go jump into the pool to dry up."
I have no doubts, based on the evidence I have seen and read, that the Separatist crew under the direction of Russian trainers fired the Buk at what they thought was a Ukrainian transport, reported it, saw what was falling from the skies, packed the Buk up on the transporter which was returned to Russia and are now dead.
If you support the resolution to find out the truth, then you should also support making public of the black box contents and the BBC interview of locals just after the crash which was censored by the "freedom of speech" loving British Brainwashing Corporation.
Why don't you want a proper investigation? Just so Russia can prepare more lies and disinformation?
Yes, checked it between my ears. It's much larger but only those who have one at least as large as mine can appreciate it.
Keep believing your own propaganda. Most people can see the truth.
What politics? Oh dear, you have a lot of catching up to do. DFI is a wealth of information. Spend some time reading.
DFI is the same, Britain bad, Russia good, India awesome, Pakistan rubbish
Correction. There was an investigation. There is nothing going on now. It is stalled.
It's not, the report will be published once they've completed it. Very clever actually to get Russia to veto the tribunal. Watch this space for the entire Russian propaganda machine to start up with lies, spinning, disinformation
You should understand that I am a science graduate, and I have been "indoctrinated" to ask questions and not take things
prima facie. You don't speak
ex cathedra either, do you? I can say that,
undoubtedly.
Authority of what? That I'm an 'anonymous' user of a bulletin board and have Brit Mil experience? A damn sight more experience than you in life and as you're a 'Putin fan boy' ie not prepared to hear or see anything against him or Russia, able to see more than one side of an argument.
Also, unlike you, I admit if I'm wrong
Not a Nazi, but a supporter of anything that might help me in my cause against my enemies.
You admitted previously to being a Nazi.
Yes, it is a blog. More importantly, it is not BBC and NYT. That is reliable enough for me.
I'll dig up the Blog on RT Bloopers then if that's your evidence threshold.
Regarding your whateverometer, indeed, because it shows RT as more reliable than whatever you give a whatever for. :blah:
Yeah, RT a propaganda machine reported to Ofcom. Much as I dislike the liberal BBC far more respected internationally than RT.
Edit: I just had to edit my post because someone doesn't know how to quote.
Not me, you block quoted, so FAIL (again)