Chinese Troops Intrude into Indian Territory in Ladakh!!!

what options India have if china doesn't pull back from ladakh?


  • Total voters
    131
Status
Not open for further replies.

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,270
Likes
19,493
Ok... So, Demchok village is under Indian control... the area to the east of demchok village is under chinese control as per this thread

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/china/36247-demchok-t-point-indian-army-pla-meet-face-face.html
Exactly, that is what I was saying. The PLA buggers have become too audacious, thanks to our soft peddling of this issue. Sometimes, I feel like India should open up an artillery barrage and destroy that blue roofed building. Problem is, if it escalates, India might get to lose.

That is why we need to really strengthen our military.

I am more inclined to believe that the PLA needs to be pushed out of East Turkestan and Tibet, if there is any scope for peace.
 

ladder

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2013
Messages
5,564
Likes
4,946
Country flag
Ok... So, Demchok village is under Indian control... the area to the east of demchok village is under chinese control as per this thread

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/china/36247-demchok-t-point-indian-army-pla-meet-face-face.html
The Demchok village on map must be New Demchok village.

Demchok - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Demchok - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Across the wadi, less than a kilometer away, is a Chinese-administered village, called Dêmqog, which was once part of Demchok.
 
Last edited:

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
706
I am more inclined to believe that the PLA needs to be pushed out of East Turkestan and Tibet, if there is any scope for peace.
If that is what you feel is necessary for peace, then there will never be peace between China and India. China would never accept the loss of those territories, unless foreign troops were dictating terms in Tiananmen Square - and China would never accept that unless Tiananmen Square were radioactive.

Learning to live with the current boundaries is the best hope for peace.
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,270
Likes
19,493
If that is what you feel is necessary for peace, then there will never be peace between China and India. China would never accept the loss of those territories, unless foreign troops were dictating terms in Tiananmen Square - and China would never accept that unless Tiananmen Square were radioactive.

Learning to live with the current boundaries is the best hope for peace.
Those territories never belonged to China. China ends where Tibet begins. China is less than half of the total size of PRC.
 

AVERAGE INDIAN

EXORCIST
Senior Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
3,062
Likes
3,446
Country flag
New China incursion targets Indian Army, stops jawans from entering LAC in Finger-VIII

Indian Army was "handling" the situation arising out of the latest incursion in Ladakh, Defence Minister A K Antony said today after yet another China incursion led PLA troops to prevent jawans from patrolling up to LAC in Finger-VIII area where they have built a road inside Indian territory.

"Army is updated about latest position there. Whenever these kind of incidents happen in the local areas, they are handling it," he told reporters here and asserted that India can protect its national interests.

The Defence Minister was asked about the recent Chinese incursion in Ladakh where its troops have built a road five kms inside the Indian territory.

"Indian can protect its national interests. India is not the India of the past," the Minister said.

A recent incident has come to light in Ladakh where Chinese troops prevented their Indian counterparts from patrolling up to the Line of Actual Control.

The alleged incident took place near Finger-VIII area, also known as Siri Jap, on May 17, two days before Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang arrived in New Delhi after it was announced that the stand-off resulting from a 19-kilometre deep Chinese intrusion had ended.

Asked about the readiness of armed forces, the Minister said, "We are fully prepared. The nation can be fully assured that our armed forces are fully prepared."

He said countries are "showing keen interest in strengthening defence relationship with us. Every body wants more cooperation of our defence forces, that shows gradual enhancement in our capabilities."

The Minister said he would be visiting China soon as was decided during the visit of the then Chinese Defence Minister Gen Liang Guanglie in September last year.

The Minister said that he would visit Australia, Singapore and Thailand in the first week of June.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/n...wans-from-entering-lac-in-fingerviii/1121278/
 

sesha_maruthi27

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
3,961
Likes
1,793
Country flag
China will regret its occupation of Tibet in the near future.........

They are doing the same atrocities done by the japanese on the Chinese, so the chinese will face the same fate like the japanese...........
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
706
China will regret its occupation of Tibet in the near future.........

They are doing the same atrocities done by the japanese on the Chinese, so the chinese will face the same fate like the japanese...........
Please point out the part where Tibetan civilians are dying by the millions via intentional famines, biological warfare, and firebombing.
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
706
Those territories never belonged to China. China ends where Tibet begins. China is less than half of the total size of PRC.
You might believe that, but 1.3 billion Chinese don't. That's a lot of people armed with a lot of increasingly high-tech weapons that you will have to either kill or persuade via armed force.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
9,513
Likes
14,258
Country flag
You might believe that, but 1.3 billion Chinese don't. That's a lot of people armed with a lot of increasingly high-tech weapons that you will have to either kill or persuade via armed force.
So your claim to Tibet is those "weapons" you have.

This proves that you got no original historic claim to Tibet(and South China and many other illegal occupied territories) and just land by force theory.
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
706
So your claim to Tibet is those "weapons" you have.

This proves that you got no original historic claim to Tibet(and South China and many other illegal occupied territories) and just land by force theory.
Nope. We believe we have a historic claim to those areas you cited. You believe we don't. How do you reconcile these two points of view? You can't, unless you bring a gun.

To borrow a phrase from the mafia, on questions of turf - you either come heavy, or not at all.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
9,513
Likes
14,258
Country flag
Nope. We believe we have a historic claim to those areas you cited. You believe we don't. How do you reconcile these two points of view? You can't, unless you bring a gun.
You have included the GUNS... we didn't go inside 20 kms of LAC and made tents only to pack bags and return like losers. :lol:
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
706
You have included the GUNS... we didn't go inside 20 kms of LAC and made tents only to pack bags and return like losers. :lol:
Who still holds sway over all of Tibet? Answer: not India.
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
706
Question : Who attacked and occupied a FREE Country like Tibet which has no army of his own.

Answer : Not India.
Question: Who reoccupied a backwards theocracy that illegally seceded from China in order to continue treating its people as serfs under a feudalistic caste system?

Answer: Not India.

See how these questions can never be answered in a universal and objective manner? When they can't, the only answer that suffices is the bullet or the yuan, not the spoken word; plata e plomo, no verdad.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
9,513
Likes
14,258
Country flag
Question: Who reoccupied a backwards theocracy that illegally seceded from China in order to continue treating its people as serfs under a feudalistic caste system?

Answer: Not India.

See how these questions can never be answered in a universal and objective manner? When they can't, the only answer that suffices is the bullet or the yuan, not the spoken word; plata e plomo, no verdad.
Question : Which people issue threats to all of it's neighbors on daily basis and claim "peaceful rise".Recent example was provoking a large neighbor by setting tents but later packed it's bags leaving everyone laughing.

Answer : Not India.

Tibet was NEVER yours.You can sit on it as long as you can threaten them with guns. Same goes to the other territories which you claim is yours.We know which caste system is used in your country.

btw bringing "caste system" just PROVED you are a TROLL who is looking to derail thread when cant answer a straight question.

So you see the questions keeps coming if the ORIGINAL question is not answered and instead trolling starts.You got no historic claims and you just wanna use GUNS to solve all issues.
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,270
Likes
19,493
Question : Who attacked and occupied a FREE Country like Tibet which has no army of his own.

Answer : Not India.
Tibet had its own army, and fought the initial PLA invasion, but was defeated.

Question: Who reoccupied a backwards theocracy that illegally seceded from China in order to continue treating its people as serfs under a feudalistic caste system?

Answer: Not India.

See how these questions can never be answered in a universal and objective manner? When they can't, the only answer that suffices is the bullet or the yuan, not the spoken word; plata e plomo, no verdad.
Don't you think you should know a bit more about Tibet, that you claim to be your own?
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,133
Likes
23,720
Question: Who reoccupied a backwards theocracy that illegally seceded from China in order to continue treating its people as serfs under a feudalistic caste system?

Answer: Not India.

See how these questions can never be answered in a universal and objective manner? When they can't, the only answer that suffices is the bullet or the yuan, not the spoken word; plata e plomo, no verdad.
This has been answered many a time on this forum.

You seem to have done selective reading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top