China military doctrine

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Article is 2 years old.

Analysis of Chinese Military Doctrine Indicates China Could Pose Serious Challenge to U.S. and Allied Air Forces


An exhaustive study of Chinese military sources reveals that a future Chinese air force campaign would, under most likely scenarios, seriously test the United States and its allies in a conflict, according to a new RAND Corporation study.

The study, "Shaking the Heavens and Splitting the Earth: Chinese Air Force Employment Concepts in the 21st Century," finds that China poses a serious threat if it implements the concepts described in its military publications in combination with the new capabilities it is acquiring — such as its recently unveiled stealth fighter.

The study by RAND, a non-profit research organization, provides detailed analysis of how the Chinese military would employ its air forces in a future conflict, particularly in a conflict over Taiwan and a potential clash with U.S. and allied forces. It also describes what actions the United States can take in response to Beijing's military thinking.

"Just 10 years ago China's air force was an antiquated service equipped almost exclusively with weapons based on 1950s-era Soviet designs and operated by personnel with questionable training," said Roger Cliff, the study's lead author and a China specialist at RAND. "Today, it appears to be on its way to becoming a modern, highly capable air force for decades to come."

Citing research gleaned from Chinese military sources, the authors find that Chinese military analysts are focusing on developing specific, practical concepts for its air forces. For example, recognizing the superiority of potential adversaries, such as the United States, in air-to-air combat, Chinese military publications emphasize attacking an enemy air force on the ground before it can take off.

The authors say China will also aim to achieve air superiority by destroying or suppressing enemy ground-based air defense systems and air defense command systems. While China recognizes it is unlikely to gain complete air superiority against the United States, researchers say the People's Liberation Army Air Force simply aims to achieve its campaign or tactical objectives.

"If these doctrinal principles are reflected in actual training and, in the event of a conflict, in campaign and mission planning, the United States could find itself engaged with adversary air forces both qualitatively and quantitatively superior to any it has fought since the end of the Cold War," Cliff said. "Indeed, the United States has not fought a conflict against an adversary capable of challenging its supremacy in the air since at least the Korean War."

RAND researchers note that although China's air forces have traditionally emphasized defensive operations, that is no longer the case, and will pose an aggressive opponent in the event of a conflict. These attacks, moreover, will be carried out not by China's air force operating in isolation but in coordination with conventional ballistic and cruise missiles.

As a result, for the first time since the end of the Cold War, U.S. air forces would not be able to regard their western Pacific bases as sanctuaries safe from enemy attack in a conflict.
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Cited in above report.

Shaking the Heavens and Splitting the Earth: Chinese Air Force Employment Concepts in the 21st Century | RAND

Less than a decade ago, China's air force was an antiquated service equipped almost exclusively with weapons based on 1950s-era Soviet designs and operated by personnel with questionable training according to outdated employment concepts. Today, the People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) appears to be on its way to becoming a modern, highly capable air force for the 21st century. This monograph analyzes publications of the Chinese military, previously published Western analyses of China's air force, and information available in published sources about current and future capabilities of the PLAAF. It describes the concepts for employing forces that the PLAAF is likely to implement in the future, analyzes how those concepts might be realized in a conflict over Taiwan, assesses the implications of China implementing these concepts, and provides recommendations about actions that should be taken in response.
(Page says you can download PDF version, but you can't. You have to buy paper copy.)
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
The Evolution of Chinese Military Doctrine | Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses
This paper discusses the factors responsible for the evolution of the Chinese military doctrine and attempts to chalk out its nuances. Its core premise is that a military doctrine is a component of a nation's grand strategy for security and, at times, it may not be stating actual military conditions but is simply a declaration of its strategic intent. The paper finds that Chinese have learned from their and others' experience. China's threat perception and relations with the nations of the world has changed with time influencing their military doctrine.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Addresses China's strategic intent.

Implications of recent incidents for China's claims and strategic intent in the South China Sea (part 2) | The Strategist
When discussing China's South China Sea (SCS) strategy, it's necessary to begin by asserting that there is in fact a strategy that's readily discernible from public documents and pronouncements. Though there's been some disagreement over the degree of coordination between operational units and the central government, with some analysts even questioning if Beijing actually has a discernible strategy in these areas, others have contended that China does in fact have a plan—one that it regards as increasingly successful in achieving its desired objectives. According to Peter Dutton (PDF), the Director of the Chinese Maritime Studies Institute (CMSI) at the US Naval War College, this strategy is centred on the use of 'non-militarized coercion' that has provided a means for controlled escalation.
 

JBH22

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,496
Likes
17,873
PLAAF still lags behind USAAF or even RAF for that matter.

Would be great if we have a thread on Indian Military Doctrine though :)
 

Decklander

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
2,654
Likes
4,111
China has not faced a war for over four decades and even when they did face one, they lost very badly. 1962 is an abration as IA was ill equipped to fight in those icy heights. PLAAF has never been used in an actual war and PLAN has yet to be baptised as a fighting force.
Experience is the cheapest thing to buy in the world provided you get it second hand. Without experience, a fighting force irrespective of its weapons is a force of novice soldiers. The real strength comes out when you face bullets flying all around you and the air is full of burnt cordite.
 

hbogyt

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
231
Likes
11
China has not faced a war for over four decades and even when they did face one, they lost very badly. 1962 is an abration as IA was ill equipped to fight in those icy heights. PLAAF has never been used in an actual war and PLAN has yet to be baptised as a fighting force.
Experience is the cheapest thing to buy in the world provided you get it second hand. Without experience, a fighting force irrespective of its weapons is a force of novice soldiers. The real strength comes out when you face bullets flying all around you and the air is full of burnt cordite.
A certain Canadian military professional would disagree with you.
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
China has not faced a war for over four decades and even when they did face one, they lost very badly. 1962 is an abration as IA was ill equipped to fight in those icy heights. PLAAF has never been used in an actual war and PLAN has yet to be baptised as a fighting force.
Experience is the cheapest thing to buy in the world provided you get it second hand. Without experience, a fighting force irrespective of its weapons is a force of novice soldiers. The real strength comes out when you face bullets flying all around you and the air is full of burnt cordite.
The sino-vietnam war ended in 1989. That is 24 years.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top