IndianHawk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 9,058
- Likes
- 37,672
We don't need to talk about anything other than lca.The J-15 like all Flankers can carry 12 tons. The LCA can carry 4 tons (according to Indians but who knows?) That is the law of aviation based on engine and configuration. A single engine light fighter cannot carry more yhan a twin engine heavy fighter. Unless you are a liar or just extremely clueless about aviation, you would know this.
The article is talking about the load when launching off a ski-jump. The LCA will carry much less than the J-15 when flying off the same ski-jump. That is the law of physics.
Off a CATOBAR carrier, the J-15 will carry the full 12 ton load. The same with LCA if there is ever a CATOBAR version.
And why are you using the LCA again when comparing to carrier craft? Indians have nothing else to talk about?
Ever heard quality over quantity??.
You can field all the junk series because Chinese know that they can't met LCA.
LCA with advanced composite materials and low rcs will not even be visible to chinese 3rd grade radars.
But on LCAs radar display heavy outdated metal box fighters will clearly look like the big mess of junk that they actually are.
Then the great engineers of china put overpowered Russian engines which will emit enormous heat signatures.
It will be duck hunting session for LCA .
Now let's talk Carrier. First build a CATOBAR than talk about it. It's a whole different ball game.
NLCA already flying in SBTF Ins Hansa.
Just Google oh wait.... you cant:biggrin2:
We already have two carriers on the sea we are not desperate to show off half baked junk jumping around.:bounce:
Accept that you need so many junk series because none of them actually is effective.
Go back to drawing board .