You have no idea what you want to say
1. Democratic and free market nations are ALWAYS wealthier than communist ones when human and natural resources are equivalent,
I think as usual you talk thru your hat . The nations of Nepal & its "neighbours" have been democratic less than 100 yrs. Compare that to the US which has been democratic since its foundation 250 years ago or the UK which traces its path to democracy since the Magna Carta nearly 900 years ago .
That's how they're wealthy since they equalised everybody GRADUALLY & SIMULTANEOUSLY focused on bettering the lives of their people thru universal education , trade & adult franchise.
2. If a democratic country is poorer than a communist-run nation one then there are other factors including ethnicity and culture that limit the advantages it has over the communist one.
Other factors including ethnicity & culture , I think, best explain why some nations readily accept the slavery imposed on them by their masters like for instance in the Arab nations & of course in countries like China where the CCP rules supreme or even Russia under centuries of autocratic rule.
3. A country of say 1.4B people with a free and democratic system should be MUCH WEALTHIER than a communist country of 1.4B. If it is poorer then the issues are with other factors such as culture and ethnicity outside of governance since free democracies are invariably much wealthier.
A country with 1.4 billion people with a democratic system less than 100 years old WILL BE MUCH WEALTHIER than any country with a similar population & authoritarian rule for that country with a democratic system didn't see millions of lives lost due to a civil war & purges post the civil war , didn't see millions of lives lost to stupid decision making which led to the great leap forward & the 5 pests campaign & didn't see any massive upheaval of society thanks to events like the cultural revolution.
In other words , it saw a much more stable system than a similar sized nation which was enslaved by their own & which was subject to the whims of its masters.
If in spite of such a history the slaves of the CCP actually trust the CCP to take it forward thanks only to the economic prosperity those slaves have seen in the last 40 years thinking this is going to last them for a few centuries then the recent downturn of the economy & various other such alarming economic & other developments should wake them up.
If those slaves still don't wake up choosing to believe that those 40 years of economic prosperity will last them forever in spite of the history of the their masters - the CCP then perhaps it's got to do with other factors apart from their own ethnicity & culture.
I have no claims for the CCP other than that it is has a track record of change.
I actually read a report not so long ago where the Japanese saw curious parallels in present day CCP China to pre WW-2 Japan which grew increasingly confident & consequently belligerent thanks to the prosperity it enjoyed in the 70-80 odd years after the Meiji Restoration & the opening up to the outside world where they thought they could create an Empire & take on the west thinking that the west to whom they owed their modernisation & economic prosperity in large measure , was decadent . We know how that one ended .
However the CCP mustn't let itself be guided by what happened to newly industrialised & modernised nations like Japan & Germany in the first half of the 20th century. It must proceed on the course it has charted for itself which also includes the re taking of Taiwan.
China cannot grow an economy that's bigger than the US and the EU without the ability to change its communist ways:
View attachment 234896
A leopard can camouflage itself but it can't change its spots. The CCP can adopt Western capitalism to improve its economic conditions without changing its political systems or way of thinking but to replace the west it has to become either completely like the west which you won't
or come up with a viable alternative to their world vision which you can't coz it's beyond the CCP's capacities.
