Re: Japan ups ante on Diaoyu islands
nope, its too small, no food, no fresh water, just bunch rock.Were the islands ever inhabited?
nope, its too small, no food, no fresh water, just bunch rock.Were the islands ever inhabited?
YesWere the islands ever inhabited?
Photos on this link:1909: Japanese population of the islands became 248."[65][48]
History under Japanese and US control
Japanese workers at a bonito fisheries processing plant on Uotsurishima sometime around 1910[15]The Japanese central government formally annexed the islands on January 14, 1895. Around 1900, Japanese entrepreneur Koga TatsushirÅ (å¤è³€ 辰四郎?) constructed a bonito processing plant on the islands with 200 workers. The business failed in 1940 and the islands have remained deserted ever since.[15]
In the 1970s, Koga TatsushirÅ's descendents Zenji and Hanako TatsushirÅ sold the islands to the Kurihara family of Saitama Prefecture. Hiroyuki Kurihara owns Uotsuri, Kita Kojima, and Minami Kojima. Hiroyuki's sister owns Kuba.[16]
The islands were under US government occupation authority from 1945 until 1972.[15] Since the islands reverted to Japanese government control in 1972, the mayor of Ishigaki has been given civic authority over the territory. The Japanese central government, however, has prohibited Ishigaki from surveying or developing the islands.[15][17]
In 1971, the Taiwanese and Chinese governments officially began to declare ownership of the islands after the U.N. issued a report about possible gas and oil reserves in the Senkaku area
You should'nt believe all crap from this guynope, its too small, no food, no fresh water, just bunch rock.
What "control"?? did they inhabited those islands?? no! did they use it for anything?? no! Okinawa, as we know it today, was the so called Ryukyu kingdomoh plz. everyone else recognize the control of those island before 1st sino-japan war was china qing dynasty, most government official of ryuku kingdom were chinese, guess who are the descendants of so call ryuku kingdom, taiwaness !!!
The islands were part of ryukyu which an independent kingdom.. not part of china!!the ISLAND never been inhabit by anyone even till now, and it was under qing empire control before 1st sino-japan war. you are the only person still saying its part of japan. heck ill bet you think the terroritory dispute between s.korea-japan are also belong to japan.
please stop misleading everybody.. stop reinventing history!!!you have nothing other than japanese propaganda, and distorted history. if japan don't even admit the atrocities done during WWII, how can anyone belief your version of history
if your logic is really logicall can your logic also be applied to indian fishermen to pakistan and SL???what was IN doing back then???^^ Next time PLA should grow some balls and stop forcing poor fishermen to do this dirty job.
indian fisherman don't go and raise flag on paki or SL terrirtory.These are insignificant small terrorist nations which india can wipe out easily.They are mostly captured when they cross indian sea territory and enter paki sea territory.if your logic is really logicall can your logic also be applied to indian fishermen to pakistan and SL???what was IN doing back then???
the record is in chinese history. but is india/china dispute also has record that date back 500 years, indicate its part of india? unlike. its not like there is UN or international court recognize each countries area back few hundred years ago.China owned these islands?
Was it written in the fables of the Grand Historian of China that is passed off as history.?
sometime i feel Chinese fisherman are paramilitary and not civilians, when ever we see the escalation of dispute, they sail their boats to the disputed area. or Chinese navy is operating fishing industry in china?BEIJING — Around 1,000 Chinese fishing boats are expected to arrive in waters near the Senkaku Islands claimed by China later Monday, the state-run China National Radio reported, in what may be Beijing's additional countermeasures over Japan's nationalization of the islets.
If a large number of Chinese vessels intrude into Japanese territorial waters around the Japanese-controlled islands in the East China Sea, it could trigger unexpected incidents such as clashes with Japan Coast Guard patrol ships, further escalating tensions between the two countries.
The radio station said in an online edition that Chinese fisheries authorities will monitor the fishing boats' activities near the uninhabited islets, which Beijing calls Diaoyu, via a marine observation satellite.
The 1,000 boats from coastal provinces such as Zhejiang and Fujian may be joined by six Chinese surveillance ships that have been staying in nearby waters since intruding into Japanese territorial waters near the islands Friday.
Meanwhile, anti-Japan protests continued in Beijing for the seventh straight day on Monday, but were much smaller than the mass demonstrations — some violent — that took place across China over the weekend.
As police tightened security around the Japanese Embassy, about 200 people on Monday marched on a street in front of the embassy, protesting the Japanese government's announcement on Tuesday last week that it put the islands under state control by signing a purchase contract with the owner of three of the islands, a Japanese individual.
Some of the protests on Saturday and Sunday involved vandalism, looting and arson targeting Japanese factories, stores and restaurants operating in the country.
Anti-Japan protests are likely to continue up to the 81st anniversary on Tuesday of the start of the 1931 Mukden Incident, also known as the Manchurian Incident, in which the Imperial Japanese Army blew up a Japanese railway in southern Manchuria to serve as a pretext for invading northeastern China.
Japan maintains the Senkaku Islands are an integral part of Japanese territory and that there are no territorial disputes between the two countries. Taiwan also claims sovereignty over the islands, which are known as Tiaoyutai to the Taiwanese.
1,000 Chinese boats headed for Senkakus: report | The Japan Times Online
In addition to it SL has support from central over tamil fishermenif your logic is really logicall can your logic also be applied to indian fishermen to pakistan and SL???what was IN doing back then???