Biased Western Media coverage

Vinash

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2021
Messages
2,878
Likes
22,619
Country flag
I am worrying about American sub national diplomacy . I think government should outright bans the NGO and say in clear terms that they won’t go ahead with this subnational .
It'll cause small fissures but it won't be lethal for India.

Also, America can try such funny stuff with India for another 20-30 years max. If India can get to $20 Trillion by 2047-50, their sub national diplomacy will end as any secessionist movement will realise it's better to stick with India than break away.
 

fooLIam

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
366
Likes
1,135
It'll cause small fissures but it won't be lethal for India.

Also, America can try such funny stuff with India for another 20-30 years max. If India can get to $20 Trillion by 2047-50, their sub national diplomacy will end as any secessionist movement will realise it's better to stick with India than break away.
Yeah ,economy is big part and big if. Hopefully it panned out that way. But one thing is clear west cannot be trusted for economy to skyrocket . I think they have learn their lesson from china rise so won’t be helping us .if we will be doing on our own than all NGO and “activist” protest to stop those.
 

Wisemarko

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
1,095
Likes
1,979
Country flag
India don't need single engine fighter and yes F16 is a kick ass fighter , both statement are true.

The problem of India is not about US selling F16 , The problem is pretext which says its been sold to Pakistan to counter terrorism.
We all know what it will used against .
Haven’t Sukhois been sold to China? Did you complain then?
 

AnantS

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
3,243
Likes
6,842
Country flag
Haven’t Sukhois been sold to China? Did you complain then?
Yep, infact we were moving towards American camp slow but steadily under Trump. Heck Russia which avoided Pakistan was seriously repairing its relations. Russia and China were unhappy about India appearing to joining US axis. But glad Democrats and Deep state nixed it forever. Never ever India is going to trust US again for some time. See 'some' deals between India US in defense, but nothing shall be substantial like F16 or f18.

I am also not sure even though F18 is suitable for Vikrant, GOI will go for it. Thanks to current Gov for showing that only consistent policy that US had towards India is: Perfidy
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
16,381
Likes
43,719
Country flag
That’s India right there!
No, India keeps large number mid-heavy and heavy fighters which are superior to F16 by a far margin. It has more than sufficient budget for same.

F16 is for states like Jordan, Pakistan, Syria and Thailand etc.. Not for like China, India, Russia, France, UK or even US. Even USAF is looking replace F-16.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
16,381
Likes
43,719
Country flag
Haven’t Sukhois been sold to China? Did you complain then?
No, Sukhois were produced on license by China and were aimed against west. We bought weapons from Russia and aimed against China and Pakistan.

USA aids and donates weapons to Pak only to contain India.

Beyond all the lip service, antipathy towards India in American deep state is real. Cooperation barely moved anywhere beyond diplomatic speeches. Whatever little we came through was nothing more than give & take trade between US and India. From 1965 intervention to 1971 USS enterprise to sanctions starting for 1970s, afer China, US has been largest problem for Indian security.
 

Wisemarko

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
1,095
Likes
1,979
Country flag
No, India keeps large number mid-heavy and heavy fighters which are superior to F16 by a far margin. It has more than sufficient budget for same.

F16 is for states like Jordan, Pakistan, Syria and Thailand etc.. Not for like China, India, Russia, France, UK or even US. Even USAF is looking replace F-16.
Except for handful of Rafale, no Indian fighter is even close to F-16V. There is no comparison between India and China/France/UK /US. Don’t know why Russia is even mentioned.
 

Wisemarko

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
1,095
Likes
1,979
Country flag
Sukhois were produced on license by China and were aimed against west.
Are you claiming there are no Chinese Su-35 positioned against India? Man, some Indians are Putin fanboys, they can abuse you but you will stick around 😂
 

Wisemarko

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Messages
1,095
Likes
1,979
Country flag
Did china asked sukhoi for counter terrorism?
No, they asked for Su-35 to fck India and your masters (Russians) obliged. Heck, they even threw in some S-400 for kicks. At least US tried for an excuse.
 
Last edited:

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
16,381
Likes
43,719
Country flag
Except for handful of Rafale, no Indian fighter is even close to F-16V.
No, all fighters in IAF above Mirage 2000 including MKI and Fulcrum are of higher category and superior over F-16V. F-16 class planes can't be a frontline fighter for India till heavy planes exist.

India has Mirage 2000 for role of F-16 which will be replaced by Tejas Mk2, better than any F-16 block. So, F-16 won't ever come to India.

Only useful plane US has for India is F-18 super hornet. And its alternatives exist both internationally and being developed locally.
There is no comparison between India and China/France/UK /US.
In types of aircraft they utilise, they are comparable.
In overall strength, US is beyond comparison with any power.
Followed by Russia, China, India and France are second tier level powers.
UK a bit below.
Don’t know why Russia is even mentioned.
Don't think you know anything about global air forces then.
Are you claiming there are no Chinese Su-35 positioned against India? Man, some Indians are Putin fanboys, they can abuse you but you will stick around 😂
No, they asked for Su-35 to fck India and your masters (Russians) obliged. Heck, they even threw in some S-400 for kicks. At least US tried for an excuse.
No, Su-35 was positioned against India way later when Indo-China relations became openly hostile after Bhutan episode. You can't compare the small scale trade over between two cold war era allies Russia and China with USA which provides firepower to a radical Islamic state free of cost strictly to tame India.

USA anyway has been more hostile to India than China since independence if history of sanctions, assistance to Pakistan and policy interventions are seen. Guess most of India's naval power, nuclear weapons, long range missiles and nuclear submarines weren't developed because of Chinese threat but because of US patrolling and hostility to India in IOR in 1970s era.
 

Varoon2

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2021
Messages
487
Likes
1,706
Country flag
Everytime I open the MSN.com home page or international page, ( not the MSN India site) any story regarding India is really brutal, about some savagery( tantric ritual leading to death) acid throwing, ' caste' based violence, rape, horrible accident or natural calamity. Or otherwise something negative. There is never a single positive, uplifting, laudatory, cheerful item about India. Now, there are brutal stories filed from many countries as well, including the US. And no doubt if the compilers of the India news are ever questioned, they will come up with the very clever response that they do the same for other countries. But with those other countries, particularly the Western ones, even China and East Asia, there are also good news, positive, achievement reports as well. What exactly does MSN have against India, and who specifically is responsible for disseminating this type of news?
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top