Perhaps since I don't have strong emotions on the topic or even on Churchill I must say that I'm better positioned to discuss objectively this issue.
Well I don't intend to name call. I'm simply pointing out that since you're clearly an Indian nationalists you're emotionally invested to this issue
You're anything but neutral or objective or free from confirmation bias. This is what was the reason of your few of venting posts on last page when you were left with nothing but claims when sources with quotes were presented those seemed reasonable.
You're not supposed to reject this all either as venting from "Indian nationalists". Not only because its ad hominem but you have continuous history of pro American/European stances on most of issues, no matter if you have to be rational or irrational. That way, even Indians would become more eligible to comment on moral sides as they aren't aligned to any of allies or axis powers.
No one is denying that other didn't play a role in famine. Indeed winning WW2 was utmost priority for British empire as well. India just like any other colony was an asset of British empire essentially, been exploited to boost the power of empire which led to India's own economic decline. Being single largest colonized entity, UK's transition to become a benevolent power wouldn't have been possible without it given India even was a self funding machine. Both UK's wargames and Churchil's racism too played a role equal or superior to natural factors that caused famine. As when emergency knocked the door, UK chose to use its asset to neutralise enemies at cost of significant Indian population. Policies and PoVs have been elaborated throughout thread multiple times. If empire wasn't there, famine wouldn't have either. Not being an asset was the reason why Republic of India did not face a major famine. Any attempt to refute it is clear a whitewash.
It's a collection of different factors, both environmental and human (negligence, greed, war) that has come together to create this catastrophy.
Churchill being the poster boy of British colonialism in India is an easy target for blame on bad things that happened during the colonial period.