blank_quest
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2012
- Messages
- 2,119
- Likes
- 925
the problem is why 10k pathans fought just 21 sikhs!:taunt1:Pathans won... none of the Sikhs survived and all were martyred. So where is the problem ?
the problem is why 10k pathans fought just 21 sikhs!:taunt1:Pathans won... none of the Sikhs survived and all were martyred. So where is the problem ?
I know about this quite well.It's included in one of the most valiant battles of history.Great fighting attitude.Sikhs are always known to fight against a large army.One of the most famous last stands in history.....
Manvir Singh: The Battle of Saragarhi
Battle of Saragarhi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You should learn to respect bravery of others.Seems like you want another whooping from Sikhs.well Indeed Sikh were once good warrior
but the question can someone digest this?
I mean just 21 against 10k that too pushtoon people
He is a Paki so dont expect him to know much other than brainwashed "Paki the only true super dooper pooper martial race"Have you ever read about Sukerchakiya Misl?? Sikhs were ferocious warrior always.
The problem is the kill ratio and those Pashtun happened to be muslims and he feels humiliated.Pathans won... none of the Sikhs survived and all were martyred. So where is the problem ?
Shit happens....one battle takes nothing away from the pathans who were probably the only ethnicity fighting the british constantly, by and large.The problem is the kill ratio and those Pashtun happened to be muslims and he feels humiliated.
21 killed about 180 to 450 so it's 1: 10 to 1:20.
Thats pinching him.
The problem is in the mindset also!The problem is the kill ratio and those Pashtun happened to be muslims and he feels humiliated.
21 killed about 180 to 450 so it's 1: 10 to 1:20.
Thats pinching him.
Pashtuns were not invincible as some people claim and wants everyone to believe.Shit happens....one battle takes nothing away from the pathans who were probably the only ethnicity opposing the british, by and large.
Never said they were invincible..but for all their faults I respect their sense of freedom. Personal opinion.Pashtuns were not invincible as some people claim and wants everyone to believe.
Read a bout Maharaja Ranjit Singh for details.
while in future when you think why i Am not replying than you should get this that guys like you always lend into my ignore list(i wish there was block so that you could not see my comment as well)The problem is the kill ratio and those Pashtun happened to be muslims and he feels humiliated.
21 killed about 180 to 450 so it's 1: 10 to 1:20.
Thats pinching him.
agree some 200 pushtoons might be killed but 10k number is too highShit happens....one battle takes nothing away from the pathans who were probably the only ethnicity fighting the british constantly, by and large.
Who said 10k pathans were killed...? 10 k pathans were involved in the battle and the highest estimate of their casualty is about 400.agree some 200 pushtoons might be killed but 10k number is too high
or not all of the 10k might be involved in the war
You should learn to respect bravery of others.Seems like you want another whooping from Sikhs.
But your comments are not surprising since a typical Paki would never admit bravery of anyone else... they are specially irritated in case of Sikhs since Sikhs always gave them good beating in wars.
You have any proof or just blowing off hot air ?and i meant the same
read my post again
200 mightbe killed
while i still doubt that 10k might be involved
and i knew it from start that not all so called 10k were killed
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
P | Battle of Saragarhi: facts and fiction | Military History | 0 | |
P | Battle of Saragarhi from Pakistani perspective | Military History | 28 | |
W | BW-20 Battle Rifle For Pakistan Army | Pakistan | 0 | |
W | Pakistan plans to buy 600 battle tanks; eyes Russian T-90 | Pakistan | 14 |