Ashdoc's movie review---The Tashkent files

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag


In 1965 , after the successful Indian resistance to Pakistani aggression a conference was organised in Tashkent in the erstwhile Soviet Union to broker peace between the two rivals . After the conference Indian prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri suddenly died and the reason officially given was heart attack as he had already suffered twice due to it . But his sudden death in midst of peace conference in a foreign country after war has led to conspiracy theories that his death was not natural .

Cut to the present day . Shweta Basu Prasad plays Raagini Phule , a young attractive female journalist . One day she receives a phone call and some documents asking her to re investigate the death of Shastri . She gets approval of her boss and her story about Shastri's death being suspicious gets headlined in the newspaper she works for . Due to the resultant publicity , a committee is formed to reexamine the facts behind Shastri's death . It is headed by Tripathi , a politician played by Mithun Chakraborty .

Raagini presents some facts saying that the death of Shastri was not natural , and arguments and fights soon break out between members of the committee . Some members are adamant that nothing unnatural happened with Shastri while others are sure that there was some foul play . Raagini goes to Tashkent where she meets a former spy who gives her some facts raising suspicions about the death .

Back home Raagini is stalked and threatened by people not wanting her to discuss more about the death . This makes her even more determined to unmask the truth about the death . She makes presentations in which former journalists of that era and Shastri's son Anil say that they are suspicious about the death . Raagini quotes former KGB spies who say India was awash with KGB spies after Shastri's death , and that both CIA and KGB tried to buy politicians during the post Shastri era . She says that the one person who could have stopped this total buyout of the country's political system due to his utter integrity was Shastri . Here was a politician who had changed his surname because he did not believe in the caste system and because that surname told his caste . He had driven around in a car taken on government loan because he was utterly non corrupt therefore could not afford his own car .

Raagini says that after Shastri's demise India came into the Soviet orbit and the word socialist was added to it's constitution when all opposition leaders were in jail . The death of Shastri also benefited the Nehru Gandhi family and Shastri could have stopped all this . Hence he was put out of the way by those who benefited by his death---both the foreign power and Indian politicians . As she goes on proving this , her tone grows more emotional and she seems to be losing control maybe because of the tremendous pressure and stress she is under after her face is blackened by a mob .

At the end of the movie she realises who had sent her the documents and made the phone call to her to raise the issue of Shastri's suspicious death . The person tells her that he did it to get political advantage over his rivals , and that such things have to be done to gain power for without power in hand nothing can be done for people's benefit . So it is obvious from the people targeted by the movie ( the opposition who else ) that the movie has been made with the ruling party's blessing in such a way that will benefit the ruling party . At least one has to give full marks to the director for being unabashed about his intentions at a time when the country is in national election mode .

Acting , background music and songs , photography and colours are all okay . The ruling party's fans will cheer the movie while the opposition supporters will fume , what else....

Verdict---Okay .

Two and a half stars out of five .
 
Last edited:

Sikhbrah

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
1,153
Likes
8,417
Country flag
Will you be watching Kalank?

The movie by all chances will show an unrealistic portrayal of Hindu-Muslim friendship during partition era and Muslims as romantic potential boyfriends/love jihadis.

But I have a fascination with Lahore and Partition stories due to my family background.. might catch it only for that reason.
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
Will you be watching Kalank?

The movie by all chances will show an unrealistic portrayal of Hindu-Muslim friendship during partition era and Muslims as romantic potential boyfriends/love jihadis.

But I have a fascination with Lahore and Partition stories due to my family background.. might catch it only for that reason.
I haven't read much about the movie and it was not on my radar . But if it is about partition and pre partition Lahore it might be my type of movie .
 

Srinivas_K

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
7,420
Likes
12,945
Country flag
Will you be watching Kalank?

The movie by all chances will show an unrealistic portrayal of Hindu-Muslim friendship during partition era and Muslims as romantic potential boyfriends/love jihadis.

But I have a fascination with Lahore and Partition stories due to my family background.. might catch it only for that reason.

I will not watch it, for me it looks like a parady movie. Typical Bollywood love story set in the pre partition era.

Lahore has changed a lot, I do not know why Bollywood always showcase the pain of Punjab partition , when Sindis, Bengalis, sikhs and Baloch all felt the similar pain.

Which also raises the question why Punjab is that important for Bollywood?
Must be D company and hawala money.
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,682
Country flag
I will not watch it, for me it looks like a parady movie. Typical Bollywood love story set in the pre partition era.

Lahore has changed a lot, I do not know why Bollywood always showcase the pain of Punjab partition , when Sindis, Bengalis, sikhs and Baloch all felt the similar pain.

Which also raises the question why Punjab is that important for Bollywood?
Must be D company and hawala money.
Simple . Bollywood is partly Punjabi dominated . Though with the Khans now pathans are powerful too .
 

Srinivas_K

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
7,420
Likes
12,945
Country flag
Simple . Bollywood is partly Punjabi dominated . Though with the Khans now pathans are powerful too .
It is all about psyops on Indians showing how partition is a horrible thing and some minority glorification at the same time degrading the majority.

One of the main reason south movies are doing good in the north. Because south movies are technologically superior, script wise better and acting skills are good.

In the last 15 years, Hollywood remakes made good money compared to cheap Bollywood scripts.

Bollywood do not make any sense to Indians at all and lives in a parallel universe.
 

Sikhbrah

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
1,153
Likes
8,417
Country flag
I will not watch it, for me it looks like a parady movie. Typical Bollywood love story set in the pre partition era.

Lahore has changed a lot, I do not know why Bollywood always showcase the pain of Punjab partition , when Sindis, Bengalis, sikhs and Baloch all felt the similar pain.

Which also raises the question why Punjab is that important for Bollywood?
Must be D company and hawala money.
Bollywood is Punjabi dominated - hence the fascination with Punjab.

D company and Hawala money will promote Muslim culture as beautiful and dreamy.. which they are doing.

Ask any pre-partition survivor of Lahore. By every account, Lahore was a very very special place in pre-partition era - among the best cities in India. Capital of Punjab, cosmopolitan city - a higher class version of Delhi back then. Also remember that Lahore city proper had a Hindu/Sikh majority. It’s the villages that surround it that titled the demographics to Muslims.

Thereby comes the famous saying.. “If you haven’t seen Lahore, you haven’t been born.”

I think it’s a Muslim shithole now though.
 

Sikhbrah

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
1,153
Likes
8,417
Country flag
Lahore has changed a lot, I do not know why Bollywood always showcase the pain of Punjab partition , when Sindis, Bengalis, sikhs and Baloch all felt the similar pain.
Punjab bore the biggest brunt of the partition violence. It was up for anyone’s taking. Muslims started slashing Hindu/Sikhs to ensure the demographic falls on their part, and they wanted the whole Punjab.

Wherever Sikhs matched them in population, we routed the Muslims out (Amritsar onwards)

Sindhis - migration was mostly peaceful till Muhajirs started flooding in with hate stories about Hindus.

Bengalis - faced direct action day, but Gandhi played a part in quelling violence down, no major scale violence after that.

Baluch - mostly left the minority population unharmed.
 

neeraj_

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
118
Likes
199
Punjab bore the biggest brunt of the partition violence. It was up for anyone’s taking. Muslims started slashing Hindu/Sikhs to ensure the demographic falls on their part, and they wanted the whole Punjab.

Wherever Sikhs matched them in population, we routed the Muslims out (Amritsar onwards)

Sindhis - migration was mostly peaceful till Muhajirs started flooding in with hate stories about Hindus.

Bengalis - faced direct action day, but Gandhi played a part in quelling violence down, no major scale violence after that.

Baluch - mostly left the minority population unharmed.
On the contrary it was bengal which saw the most violence . It was due to these bengali muslim that partition became inevitable with even hindu politicians seeing it as the only way to get rid of the scoundrels..

Gandhi was a failure why he did was stopped hindus from replying back when they get the edge while muslims continued killing.

It took people like shri Gopal das ji to silent the muzzles.
He should have been hailed and given respect for his valor due to which we were able to retain a major portion of bengal.
 

Aaj ka hero

Has left
Banned
Joined
Oct 8, 2018
Messages
1,872
Likes
4,532
Country flag
Punjab bore the biggest brunt of the partition violence. It was up for anyone’s taking. Muslims started slashing Hindu/Sikhs to ensure the demographic falls on their part, and they wanted the whole Punjab.

Wherever Sikhs matched them in population, we routed the Muslims out (Amritsar onwards)

Sindhis - migration was mostly peaceful till Muhajirs started flooding in with hate stories about Hindus.

Bengalis - faced direct action day, but Gandhi played a part in quelling violence down, no major scale violence after that.

Baluch - mostly left the minority population unharmed.
I truly side with you sir.
That's very true.
 

A chauhan

"अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l"
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
9,513
Likes
22,526
Country flag


In 1965 , after the successful Indian resistance to Pakistani aggression a conference was organised in Tashkent in the erstwhile Soviet Union to broker peace between the two rivals . After the conference Indian prime minister Lal Bahadur Shastri suddenly died and the reason officially given was heart attack as he had already suffered twice due to it . But his sudden death in midst of peace conference in a foreign country after war has led to conspiracy theories that his death was not natural .

Cut to the present day . Shweta Basu Prasad plays Raagini Phule , a young attractive female journalist . One day she receives a phone call and some documents asking her to re investigate the death of Shastri . She gets approval of her boss and her story about Shastri's death being suspicious gets headlined in the newspaper she works for . Due to the resultant publicity , a committee is formed to reexamine the facts behind Shastri's death . It is headed by Tripathi , a politician played by Mithun Chakraborty .

Raagini presents some facts saying that the death of Shastri was not natural , and arguments and fights soon break out between members of the committee . Some members are adamant that nothing unnatural happened with Shastri while others are sure that there was some foul play . Raagini goes to Tashkent where she meets a former spy who gives her some facts raising suspicions about the death .

Back home Raagini is stalked and threatened by people not wanting her to discuss more about the death . This makes her even more determined to unmask the truth about the death . She makes presentations in which former journalists of that era and Shastri's son Anil say that they are suspicious about the death . Raagini quotes former KGB spies who say India was awash with KGB spies after Shastri's death , and that both CIA and KGB tried to buy politicians during the post Shastri era . She says that the one person who could have stopped this total buyout of the country's political system due to his utter integrity was Shastri . Here was a politician who had changed his surname because he did not believe in the caste system and because that surname told his caste . He had driven around in a car taken on government loan because he was utterly non corrupt therefore could not afford his own car .

Raagini says that after Shastri's demise India came into the Soviet orbit and the word socialist was added to it's constitution when all opposition leaders were in jail . The death of Shastri also benefited the Nehru Gandhi family and Shastri could have stopped all this . Hence he was put out of the way by those who benefited by his death---both the foreign power and Indian politicians . As she goes on proving this , her tone grows more emotional and she seems to be losing control maybe because of the tremendous pressure and stress she is under after her face is blackened by a mob .

At the end of the movie she realises who had sent her the documents and made the phone call to her to raise the issue of Shastri's suspicious death . The person tells her that he did it to get political advantage over his rivals , and that such things have to be done to gain power for without power in hand nothing can be done for people's benefit . So it is obvious from the people targeted by the movie ( the opposition who else ) that the movie has been made with the ruling party's blessing in such a way that will benefit the ruling party . At least one has to give full marks to the director for being unabashed about his intentions at a time when the country is in national election mode .

Acting , background music and songs , photography and colours are all okay . The ruling party's fans will cheer the movie while the opposition supporters will fume , what else....

Verdict---Okay .

Two and a half stars out of five .
So the movie has some bitter truths/uncomfortable ideas for the opposition.
 

tsunami

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
3,296
Likes
15,479
Country flag
..........So who killed Shastri???
As per movie he was killed by KGB because he was not in favor of socialism in India.

Also after 65 victory he would have been invincible in the country so KGB killed him and helped IG to become PM, who later added Socialism in Constitution during emergency. She was bribed heavily by KGB many times in millions of $.

Movie also highlighted the fact that after so many doubts no postmortem was done, so someone at the time in system was fully working under KGBs control.

Movie also talked about CIA killing BHABHA. Bose being in Russia etc.
 

captscooby81

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2016
Messages
7,102
Likes
27,057
Country flag
Even after so many hurdles of getting only less screens the movie has done decent collection . Hope the distributors achieves break even so that more such movies are been made in future and spread

TKFiles.jpg
 

tsunami

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
3,296
Likes
15,479
Country flag
Don't forget Secular Jaan mohammad cooked for that day only.

As i always insists India/The world has two enemies one Supremacist race-White and other Supremacist Ideology- Islam. Nehru/Khangress opted Russia (to counter US/for support/xyz reasons) and Russians-KGB interfered in our internal matters and just used India as a tissue paper. :doh:
Movie in itself covered so many points which can be discussed.

Jaan Mohammad
KGB
IG

BTW I seriously hated the part in movie where they shown this angle of stupid secularism only to Insult people who think from this angle too.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top