Aryan Invasion Hypothesis

viklewapatel

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Messages
159
Likes
76
Country flag

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,458
Country flag

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,171

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,458
Country flag
But how would It help decimate AIT?
because Sarasvati dried up by 1900BCE & before 1900BCE, it was Sindhu-Saraswati civilization which was flourishing, & people of SSVC have AASI ancestry not steppe, So AIT is literally dead
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,171
because Sarasvati dried up by 1900BCE & before 1900BCE, it was Sindhu-Saraswati civilization which was flourishing, & people of SSVC have AASI ancestry not steppe, So AIT is literally dead
This claim will not be acceptable unless evidence of Settlement near Saraswati is proved.
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,171
The Crux or the argument is Modern day Dravidian = IVC people which moved down south and North Indian = Aryans who moved in after destruction of IVC between 1800 to 1500.
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,171
But all South Indians also carry ANI from about 30 to 40% comparer to 50 to 60% in North Indians.
 

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,458
Country flag
The Crux or the argument is Modern day Dravidian = IVC people which moved down south and North Indian = Aryans who moved in after destruction of IVC between 1800 to 1500.
Modern day Dravidians especially Tamilians are not IVC descendants, because IVC have IranN ancestry too,but IranN is very low in frequency in Dravidians, while Andhra Brahmins have high IranN, so the hypothesis that IVC is Dravidian can be easily thrown into dustbin
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,171
Kalibangan is literally near the confluence of Saraswati & Drishadvati

A Shiva linga, fire altars are discovered at this site ..

Then we have sites like Rakhigarhi and Bhirrana ,the oldest site
Hmm yes this changes much. Chances are IVC and Saraswati civilization were the same.
Modern day Dravidians especially Tamilians are not IVC descendants, because IVC have IranN ancestry too,but IranN is very low in frequency in Dravidians, while Andhra Brahmins have high IranN, so the hypothesis that IVC is Dravidian can be easily thrown into dustbin
So no ancestral South Indian in IVC? That would throw the Dravid larp in the dustbin.
 

Tactical Doge

𝕱𝖔𝖔𝖑𝖘 𝖗𝖚𝖘𝖍 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑𝖘 𝖋𝖊𝖆𝖗
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
9,919
Likes
60,299
Country flag
Hmm yes this changes much. Chances are IVC and Saraswati civilization were the same.

So no ancestral South Indian in IVC? That would throw the Dravid larp in the dustbin.
Not AASI
IVC has both ASI and Iranian Farmer
Tamils have large AASI and relatively low IranN ancestory
Even Mallu UCs have higher Iran and even small amounts of Steppe ancestory, lot of groups in South who can claim IVC using that logic, you don't see them claiming to be inheritors of IVC
This claim is rooted in Ebhil Aryan logic
 

Suryavanshi

Cheeni KLPDhokebaaz
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Messages
16,330
Likes
70,171
Not AASI
IVC has both ASI and Iranian Farmer
Tamils have large AASI and relatively low IranN ancestory
Even Mallu UCs have higher Iran and even small amounts of Steppe ancestory, lot of groups in South who can claim IVC using that logic, you don't see them claiming to be inheritors of IVC
This claim is rooted in Ebhil Aryan logic
Question is who are the AASI than. At first it was believed that AASI were the IVC which moved down.
Tamil Tribals have the lowest AANI could it be that they are the root of AASI.
 

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,458
Country flag
Hmm yes this changes much. Chances are IVC and Saraswati civilization were the same.
majority of the IVC sites are on the banks of Sarasvati river(now called Ghagghar-Hakra), hence IVC is also called Sindhu-Sarasvati civilization (SSC), since we have proven that the Ghaggar-Hakra river is indeed Sarasvati river, that makes Sindhu-Sarasvati Civilization, a Vedic Civilization, most probably it is Post-Vedic Civilization.
 

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,458
Country flag
Question is who are the AASI than. At first it was believed that AASI were the IVC which moved down.
Tamil Tribals have the lowest AANI could it be that they are the root of AASI.
AASI are aboriginal Indians, later some of them Migrated to Sindhu river valley, mixed with IranN and formed IVC

IVC = AASI + IranN

Even for IVC people,the frequency of AASI is high, atleast it is 60% I think, correct me if I'm wrong.

As far a AANI is concerned, I think it is hypothetical, there is no actual aDNA sample of AANI
 

Tactical Doge

𝕱𝖔𝖔𝖑𝖘 𝖗𝖚𝖘𝖍 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑𝖘 𝖋𝖊𝖆𝖗
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
9,919
Likes
60,299
Country flag
Question is who are the AASI than. At first it was believed that AASI were the IVC which moved down.
Tamil Tribals have the lowest AANI could it be that they are the root of AASI.
Noob question from my side but
Have we done any genetic study of Tribes of Andaman?
They might represent untouched AASI ancestory imho!
 

Tactical Doge

𝕱𝖔𝖔𝖑𝖘 𝖗𝖚𝖘𝖍 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖆𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑𝖘 𝖋𝖊𝖆𝖗
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2019
Messages
9,919
Likes
60,299
Country flag
Noob question from my side but
Have we done any genetic study of Tribes of Andaman?
They might represent untouched AASI ancestory imho!
1670387313395.png




Unrelated, @Vamsi when we say Jambudweepa does it encompass Andaman
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top