Aryan Invasion Hypothesis

[Vamsi]

 

[Vamsi]

@asaffronladoftherisingsun @SavageKing456

 

[Vamsi]

@asaffronladoftherisingsun @SavageKing456 @Suryavanshi
It looks like Ramayana & Dasarajna yuddha of Mahabharata are contemporary....Ramayana happened first & then Dasarajna

 

[SavageKing456]

@asaffronladoftherisingsun @SavageKing456 @Suryavanshi
It looks like Ramayana & Dasarajna yuddha of Mahabharata are contemporary....Ramayana happened first & then Dasarajna

It was effectively vishwamitra/kaushik vs risi vasistha
Indra helped vasistha in that battle afaik

 

[Vamsi]

It was effectively vishwamitra/kaushik vs risi vasistha
Indra helped vasistha in that battle afaik

vishwamitra never took part in Dasarajna yuddha, no where it was mentioned that. Goras assumed vishwamitra took part in war because of their rivalry from puranas and from the fact that vishwamitra was the first priest of Sudas before vashishtha.Also why would Vishwamitra maharsi would fight on behalf of Dasyus...

 

[Vamsi]

It was effectively vishwamitra/kaushik vs risi vasistha
Indra helped vasistha in that battle afaik

 

[SavageKing456]

vishwamitra never took part in Dasarajna yuddha, no where it was mentioned that. Goras assumed vishwamitra took part in war because of their rivalry from puranas and from the fact that vishwamitra was the first priest of Sudas before vashishtha.Also why would Vishwamitra maharsi would fight on behalf of Dasyus...

Dasyus were aryas as well
They were kicked out of india after the war and became mlecchas because of their karma
Vishwamitra and vasistha rivalry was due to kamdhenu

 

[Vamsi]

Dasyus were aryas as well
They were kicked out of india after the war and became mlecchas because of their karma
Vishwamitra and vasistha rivalry was due to kamdhenu

But, no where Rigveda mentions that Vishwamitra took the side of Dasyus

 

[Vamsi]

these steppe simps

 

[WarmongerLSK]

 

[Autofive]

“One does not ask, ‘Where is the Indo-European homeland?’ but rather ‘where they put it now?’”

- JP Mallory, one of the leading scholars of Indo-European languages studies.

While for us, the homeland was always India!

 

[Autofive]

 

[Freakk]

Th

 

[asaffronladoftherisingsun]

I also forgot to add that Jews have chg/iranN ancestry too at 50-60%.


Lol,just fucking lol,so much for "white aryan racial purity"

Met a retard irishfag. Claimed we wuz and shiet. That noob does not even know. Even by etymology grounds. Word AARYA has nothing to do with ireland. Simply because the "eire" comes from *peyH- meaning milk,fat.

 

[Freakk]

Met a retard irishfag. Claimed we wuz and shiet. That noob does not even know. Even by etymology grounds. Word AARYA has nothing to do with ireland. Simply because the "eire" comes from *peyH- meaning milk,fat.

Yes,i have heard wewuzzers Claiming irish goddes Eire means Aryan.

So,now by this logic ,is the metal iron-Aryan too?

Lol, wewuzzers with their churka ancestry don't fail to surprise me

 

[asaffronladoftherisingsun]

This fair vs dark outlook seems to be a western and/or Abrahamic obsession unknowingly imbibed by Indians. Indians are so genetically diverse, it makes no sense in our context. This is a country where children born within the same family can look like they are from different continents. To me, anyone who's in good health with pleasing features looks goods, regardless of skin colour.

The fact is whites have no claim on the word "aryan" and aryan is exclusively attested to Vedics and avestans. SindhuSarasvati, sumerians egyptians,akkadians were not any blondes.

 

[Suryavanshi]

Japanese and turkey progressed without getting colonised.

They are just trying to justify it,no, people would have preferred living backwardsly than their resources getting stolen by euros for their countries.

Why did they do so many genocides and things like apartheid if they were trying to help backwards peoeple?

And places like India and china weren't backward,they were just a bit behind by euros,this dosent make them backwards.
The only backward peoeple were sub -saharan Africans(because saharan desert was responsible for thier isolation from the rest of world and shitty climate prevented much progress).

Europeans weren't civilized either,they had recently done the inquisition to weed out heretics and what about the witch hunts and witch burning?
It was worse than sati in europe .

Maybe if non-europeans were powerful with ample resources,they should have liberated Britain and Europe from the Christian hierarchy and authoritarianism and from oppressive policies of papal patriarchy like witch hunts.

Europeans civilizing non Europeans is like the pot calling kettle black.

Besides,any good technology could have been got by non Europeans by trade and purchase.
They didn't need to colonise it ,if they were so concerned with welfare only.


This is a myth invented by white nationalists to whitewash their crimes

Europe went ahead of the world when they mastered Coal, Iron and DivideRule realpolitic.
Invention of guns changed everything in their favour.
Iron and steel is their real hero.

 

[Vamsi]

Europe went ahead of the world when they mastered Coal, Iron and DivideRule realpolitic.
Invention of guns changed everything in their favour.
Iron and steel is their real hero.

Iron, steel , steam engine....

 

[Suryavanshi]

Yeah,someone i know is his mother looks like a kurdish-iranian woman,while one of her real brother looks like a Tamil man while her other brother looks like a tajik.

Seems like Brits got confused by this and started the Aryan bullshit.

The real answer is Indians are a mix of iranN and aasi.
IranN peaks in North Indians and balochis while AASI peaks in south Indians.
The phenotype variation can be summarised in this .
That's why many north Indians look like tajiks and Iranians.
Nothing do with Europeans Aryans,but it's just iranN ancestry.
And seems like iranN ancestry is also responsible for the lighter skin ,this has nothing to do with steppe.

Punjabi actor paras Chabbra is a good example of one of the many varities of iranN phenotype while South Indians reflect aasi phenotypes.

South Indians have 40-60% iranN ancestry too but seems like AASI shows up stronger in phenotype so they turn up looking like a mix-more towards the aasi side.
And north indian shave 10-20% AASI ancestry too
So all Indians have same components but in different proportions.

Did IVC skeleton have Iran Ancestry?

 

[Freakk]

Europe went ahead of the world when they mastered Coal, Iron and DivideRule realpolitic.
Invention of guns changed everything in their favour.
Iron and steel is their real hero.

Guns gave them a huge advantage over spear-throwing tribal people in Africa, Australia
in North America, diseases eliminated the amerindians and amerindians, although more advanced than Africans didn't have the advantage of guns to fight Europeans,so guns gave them an upper hand there too.
But it's not like Europeans were unique in having guns,guns actually spread from china and then from mongol empire to europe.
Guns were also present for Mughals,Ottomans,safavids,north africans but these people already had enough wealth so they didn't really feel the need to scavenge Africa and America's.

Even though anglos had more experience,tech and knowledge,they still lost to Marathas many time, especially in the first Anglo-maratha war,and only won in the last due to mass defection of many generals from the maratha side.

Also,a less widely known fact is that they funded the industrialization(the major reason for euro advancement) from American gold and silver reserves and later from Africa.

The funniest thing here is Spain,even though Spain got so rich from american conquest in 1500,in 1580 they became bankrupt due to their wars in Europe and with the Ottomans.
They had to sell many of their kingdom property and had to lease south American gold/silver reserves to Britain, this is where the rise of Britian happened and they capatilized on this opportunity.

Even though Spain was rich and excelled in navak warfare,they still managed to lose 4 times from the ottomans(Spain only won in lepanto because the ottoman admiral was a junior officer and Spain had combined with Venice to Get much more ships than the Ottomans had).

Depsite,the Spanish naval experience,they still managed to lose the next battle where ottoman navy decimated them,so much for Spanish military superiority as claimed by their Nationalists

As for Portugal,they could just conquer spear throwing tribes in Africa,america and philipines.
They attacked morocco in hopes of conquering it but actually lost their kingdom for 100 years because their King died in battle along with the rest of the nobles in war with morocco.

They were then defeated in India by Shah Jahan,and later by the marathas in the maratha-porteguese war ,where Portugal lost all of its Indian estates and was utterly rekt.
These people are only powerful with their guns in front of isolated tribes of Africa,Americas,philipines who used bow and arrow.
Today without the absence of any colonial resources,Portugal is basically a second-third would country, depsite having the advantage of small population and adequate resources in their country and the support of EU wealth and help.

Their wealth is built on a house of cards and when u take it away,they return to their true entropical position.
Nowdays, porteguese nationalists remain depressed because of the loss of their Colonial empire where they used slavery and exploitation to get rich and wealthy temporarily.