The Genographic Project Confirms Humans Migrated Out of Africa through arabia
View attachment 66567
The most sophisticated method of study for the purpose of finding out the Out of Africa route was adopted by the Genographic Project which was funded by IBM, the computer giant. The method was so refined that it could map each step of a thousand mile journey. This method was the most accurate also. It produced the following map of the routes of human migration.
Their press release said, “Over the past six years, we’ve had the opportunity to gather and analyze genetic data around the world at a scale and level of detail that has never been done before. When we started, our goal was to bring science expeditions into the modern era to further a deeper understanding of human roots and diversity. With evidence that the genetic diversity in southern India is closer to Africa than that of europe, this suggests that other fields of research such as archaeology and anthropology should look for additional evidence on the migration route of early humans to further explore this theory.”
This good advice was ignored by majority of ait larpers, however.
See -
https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/35877.wss
An article was published on the basis of this study which said in its Abstract, “
We also observe that the patterns of recombinational diversity of these populations correlate with distance out of Africa if that distance is measured along a path crossing South Arabia. No such correlation is found through a Sinai route, suggesting that anatomically modern humans first left Africa through the Bab-el-Mandeb strait rather than through present Egypt.”
See -
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21890475/
The article further noted, in the context of the other method based on SNPs,
“And the two approaches may reflect processes taking place in different time frames with the recombination-based analysis being more sensitive to more recent events.” Thus the migrations taking place during the last 10,000 years, particularly the Indo-european migrations can be best described by the migration routes described by the Genographic Project’s study. Thus it is settled that there was only one route out of Africa and people using the Arabian coast reached India to expand further.
See -https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/29/1/25/1749992
However an obsession to stick to thar untenable position of the Egyptian route to europe, West Asia and Central Asia, kept certain ait cucks like david reich continuously making mistakes after mistakes in analysing the data emerging from all the later studies.
This research paper actually has the following words written :
“The perennial concept of people, language, and agriculture arriving to India together through the northwest corridor does not hold up to close scrutiny. Recent claims for a linkage of haplogroups J2, L, R1a, and R2 with a contemporaneous origin for the majority of the Indian castes’ paternal lineages from outside the subcontinent are rejected, although our findings do support a local origin of haplogroups F* and H.” They also rule out arrivals from Southwest Asia because West Asian haplogroups (like Y-Hg G) are not found in India.
See -
https://www.pnas.org/content/103/4/843.full
Kivisild’s findings too had shown that humans could not have arrived from West Asia into India because of lack of West Asian Y-hgs E, G, I, J* and J2f in India. Kivisild
et al wrote,
“When compared with european and Middle Eastern populations , Indians (i) share with them clades J2 and M173 derived sister groups R1b and R1a, the latter of which is particularly frequent in India; and (ii) lack or show a marginal frequency of clades E, G, I, J*, and J2f.”
Two tribal groups from southern India—the Chenchus and Koyas—were analyzed for variation in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), the Y chromosome, and one autos…
www.sciencedirect.com
At the end it is useful to add that often statements by great authors are best not forgotten. Western Eurasia was formed of populations migrating from Asia and during recent Neolithic times from Africa. Hence if plotted, european genes cannot form any cline towards Asia or Africa, while African and Asian genes will always show clinal pattern of expansion into europe.
The seminal words of Cavalli-Sforza remain valid even today, “…
both Africans and Asians contributed to the settlement of europe, which began about 40,000 years ago. It seems very reasonable to assume that both continents nearest to europe contributed to its settlement, even if perhaps at different times and maybe repeatedly. It is reassuring that the analysis of other markers also consistently gives the same results in this case. Moreover, a specific evolutionary model tested, i.e., that Europe is formed by contributions from Asia and Africa, fits the distance matrix perfectly (6). In this simplified model, the migrations postulated to have populated Europe are estimated to have occurred at an early date (30,000 years ago), but it is impossible to distinguish, on the basis of these data, this model from that of several migrations at different times. The overall contributions from Asia and Africa were estimated to be around two-thirds and one-third, respectively”.
See -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC33682/
View attachment 66567
View attachment 66567