The supposed western superiority you talk about is a very recent and a transient phenomenon . For example you can try to compare latin american conquests proably of aztec mayans empires with advanced civilizations of Asia like china and or saraswati - being oldest and grandest .Aztec and Inca empires nobodys ever even heard of neither were the vast to the extent saraswati and or mesopotamoia or chinese are .This is evident infact from the fact that the only period of time where the supposedly superior west even had an edge over proper civilisations of Asia, i.e. during the 18-20th (this is also when they coined migration larp)century is also the time they looted and raided the Asian civilisations to enrich their pathetic decadent societies.This is not anything new to known Human history of 8000 years. Indians and Chinese were
living in large cities in saraswati valley and yangtze river by 3000BCE, whenyour so called superiors were still running half naked in alps even in 7th century. Asia was the centre of arts, culture, science, philosophy, religion for most of Human history.India was the centre of the world for religion, arts, culture, science and philosophy, having also taught the other South East Asian countries like, Japanese and Chinese.
Infact .
There was heavy trade between India & Rome via Red Sea by 1st cent AD, after the fall of Rome, India still continued trading with other countries.
By the time of Augustus up to 120 ships set sail every year from Rome to India.
-G. Dumézil, French Philologist
Do you know why Columbus called America as India? Columbus was sent to the west and Vasco De Gama to the East because a major land trade route was cut off
by Ottoman Empire and the Europeans set out to find a ay through sea to the Indian ports,
Volume 6 of a nine-volume series covering the entire history of the Indian subcontinent from the earliest period up to the date of publication, in the first decade of the 20th century.
www.ibiblio.org
Indian ports were so well established in 2334 BCE that there was major trade between India and Sargon of Akkad
en.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 64664
View attachment 64666
This happened when your west hadn't even started on the way to be civilized. There existed many civilizations before them.This is a reconstruction of a 4000 years old international sea port of India known as Lothal, which was found in 20th century excavations.
It is located somewhat to the South where Indo-europeans hadn't even reached by that time(if we assume that the Larp is true)
"The world's earliest known dockyard. The canal was artificially constructed to handle berth and service ships from Egypt and Mesopotamia.
The dockyard has an area of 37×22 meters. It is the greatest work of maritime architecture before the birth of christ."
But the products of anglican church as I told you believed that yahweh created world in 4004 bce and destroyed the world in
noahs flood in 3000 bce and nothing could have survived the flood event LOL.
That being said , the western spike in living standards during the 18th century was a result of conquest by military and not because of ideas or superiority of culture
What evidence do you got to show that nomadic people from steppe produced rigveda and sustained it for thousand of years .
Danino presents the recent archaeological evidence to show that horses were present in India much before the supposed Aryan invasion. Some
recent studies actually go so far as to claim that horses are actually native to India. See the related news
See
https://hub.jhu.edu/2014/11/20/india-fossils-perissodactyla/
There is no archaeological or textual/inscriptional record of the proto-Indo-European or the Rigvedic language or cultureanywhere outside India: neither in South Russia, nor in Central Asia, nor in any of the areas on the routes leading from South Russia to Central Asia or Central Asia to the SaptaSindhava area. Pie itself is a fraud languages that was never spoken by anybody . They use same sanskrit data words 90 percent of sanskrit and other languages to construct unnatural words.
Incredibly, a mention of horses and chariots in the Rig Veda is equated with graves 4000 km away. This is simply an assumption with zero proof. It is one of the weakest links in the linguists' theories, the proverbial “elephant in the room” that basically weakens the current migration larp .
A complete war chariot from 2000 BCE has been found in Sanauli near Delhi. The world’s earliest painted images of chariots have been found in central Indian cave art dated back to the late microlithic and early Chalcolithic period (2500–1500 BCE). The 1500 BCE Daimabad bronze chariot was found in Maharashtra 2000 km south of the Khyber pass from a time when India was supposed to have no chariots or wheels.
What was the language spoken btw ? You tell . For example yamnaya etc which they keep quoting , just wanted to know thar is no proof of language , no book no text in that area . If thar is no evidence for the same then how do you know that Sanskrit came here with vedas .
proto indo european languge is joke . Its like saying you have a salad out of cucumber tomatoes and carrot and then saying this is original .From this salad we get cucumber tomatoes and carrot . They also use Sanskrit extensively to cook up shit for thar fraud language LOL and then claim pie is mothar is source . This is a circular argument . eurofags were divided into many nations made up of languages as spain spanish , germany german ,france french and so on . They believed one language meant one nation .In fact they knew all these languages were similar untill somebody came India and found Sanskrit . They realized Sanskrit sucha a great langugae spoken by black brown people ?So they started hypothesis that Sanskrit must have come from steppe . Now the problem was for example sundari means beautiful and arya means noble nobility . You do not have a race of aryans . Its adjective . You cannot say from the genes that a person speaks this language because of this gene lmao . Imagine using haplogroups and making them to stand as proxies for languge and culture .