Thanks for this. It is certainly not my fault that I have been brainwashed as one forms one's thoughts on basis of books one reads and since West is so dominating, one would mainly read western books. However, AIT is supported by even non communist and pro Hindu Indian historians. Have they been also brainwashed?
Most of the evidences which are indian based are based in Sanskrit or a local language and to perfectly understand them you need to have proper undetstanding of local culture. This is why the westerners mock us saying we do not have much business than to worship cows but only we know because it gives us milk and which is so important for our well being we worship it
Similarly many of the facts are there in Vedas which were written in around 7000 BC, not like the 1000 1500 Bcs,
And similarly westerners have a point to prove saying J Christ is the best and Chistanity is supreme,so they want to do everything and anything to prove it is like that
Aryan inward migration is one amongst it, the name itself is a vedic name, what more do you want, if aryan had come to india from outside its name itself would have been John or Peter or something
Our civilization was much more advanced than theirs, remember the gamut of all info Vedas was written in 7000 bc and their jesus came after 7000 years
Now go figure
Middle eastern women are obsessed with dying their hair blonde.... The difference between ME people and Indians is that ME tend to be be more arrogant and have a lot of pride. Indians usually lack pride. Arabs are the most arrogant people you will ever meet and tend not to self-depreciate. Indians underestimate themselves and ME overestimate themselves
